Roy Moore Was Banned From A Mall In The 80's For Repeatedly Harassing Teenage Girls

[Mr MojoRisin]

Originally Posted by WTF

That can not happen but what also can not happen is to say what can and can not be in the news.

The Guy is running for a seat in the Senate. Of course this charge can play out in the court of public opinion.

If Alabama elects him then the Senate will have to deal with the Court of Public Opinion.

That is the Court that matters to Politicians.

So this really isn't about a criminal act, but rather smearing a politicians reputation. That I don't support.

Jim

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

So this really isn't about a criminal act, but rather smearing a politicians reputation. That I don't support.Jim

That's WTF ... "smearing"! He doesn't know what a "criminal act" is, and neither does his sidekick Speedo ... who believes as long as the cops don't catch him it's not a crime!

And they pretend not to be Liberals! What frauds!

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

So this really isn't about a criminal act, but rather smearing a politicians reputation. That I don't support.

Jim

It can be both....he could have actually done what all 5 of these women allege Two are criminal but beyond the Statue of Limits.

And in his case it is not smearing his reputation but enhancing it. It seems he was known for favoring teenagers while in his thirties.

I'm not for spreading a lie. And I think after all these years it would be bullshit for a criminal investigation but ole Roy has not put up much of a Defense.....and as a politician , that is wtf he is supposed to be able to do. Make a case for his constitutes.

So far the best case he has made is for fucking teenagers and hiding behind the 10 Commandments!

[I B Hankering]

Three of the women -- above Alabama's age of consent -- said they went on a date with an older man. Those three shouldn't even be an issue. After all what was the age spread between Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator and Lewinsky? It seems one of those three claims she was served alcohol at a restaurant, but that wouldn't have been possible in a dry county.

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Well, unretouched CNN photo DEFINITELY shows that "Moore D.A. 12-22-77 Olde Hickory House" was written in different-colored ink than the rest of the inscription.

It appears that this jalopy of an accusation has completely fallen apart.

JohnP says:
November 14, 2017 at 4:31 am
The “European” style 7 was used in blue ink but not in the black. It’s not written by the same person.

Certainly looks faked to me.. BUT like always these false claimers will not get charged with dick.

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

however.. just because that document was forged, does not mean Moore is cleared, for the reasons outlined here.. he totally fucked himself with those dodgy responses on Hannity, and there is loads of corroboration about this Skanky Pedophile.. sure, Clinton got away with his deeds, Republicans need to point back 20+ years to a guilty Democrat, to try and absolve their guy.. but their guy (and many Republicans) runs as a moral crusader, and it's hilarious how many of them are rank hypocrites.

So cause he had a bad day on Hannity, it MUST only have been because he was guilty..

Originally Posted by LexusLover

FYI: The ink has different chemical composition and contains a designated "trace metal" in the "brew" that is "assigned" for that year ... aka IRS and the Feds. The FBI/Secret Service can test the ink for the trace metal and thereby determine the year it was manufactured.

SO why are not the media, DEMANDING to have that done, to VERIFY the signature is moore's??

Unless of course they KNOW ITS forged, and thus want NO ONE Looking into the lies.

Originally Posted by WTF

All good questions ....I'm sure Roy Moore, if innocent should have no problem putting himself under oath to answer as should the accusers.

This may turn out like the Duke Lacrosse team.

Let the voters decide. That is the only jury that matters right now.

ANd look what happened with the lacross team. EVEN AFTER being exhonerated, the fact the MEDIA so lampooned them to where the court of public opinion ranked them guilty even WITH NO PROOF their lives were totally and utterly ruined... AND YOU feel the people's court will be just here?

Originally Posted by WTF

If the Senate puts him and the others under oath, if he is elected....it could get interesting.

WIth how many senators lie for aliving, and NONE GET DONE for lying under oath, that's no big deal..

Originally Posted by WTF

The Guy is running for a seat in the Senate. Of course this charge can play out in the court of public opinion.

SO who cares if legally they are guilty or not, let the baying mob fuck them over...

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Three of the women -- above Alabama's age of consent -- said they went on a date with an older man. Those three shouldn't even be an issue. After all what was the age spread between Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator and Lewinsky? It seems one of those three claims she was served alcohol at a restaurant, but that wouldn't have been possible in a dry county.

The unraveling of these various stories will rest on the back pages and not be disclosed as the election approaches. They got their headlines and media convictions, and now they can move on to the next smear campaign ....

... they had to have something to get the DNC et all off the front page and keep the Liberal predators from getting back on.

I'm sure WTF is terribly disappointed the smear is getting washed away one lie at a time. He does get irritated and violent when the sunlight starts drying up the "smear"!

[Mr MojoRisin]

Originally Posted by WTF

It can be both....he could have actually done what all 5 of these women allege Two are criminal but beyond the Statue of Limits.

And in his case it is not smearing his reputation but enhancing it. It seems he was known for favoring teenagers while in his thirties.

I'm not for spreading a lie. And I think after all these years it would be bullshit for a criminal investigation but ole Roy has not put up much of a Defense.....and as a politician , that is wtf he is supposed to be able to do. Make a case for his constitutes.

So far the best case he has made is for fucking teenagers and hiding behind the 10 Commandments!

This whole thing is nothing but theatre. Five women all about the same time giving their account of inappropriate sexual encounters with Moore when they were underage teens. They have no evidence, they'll be no arrest and conviction. Moore won't step down, he'll be elected and life will go on. As far as I am concerned these so called victims were of age and they gave consent at the time.

Jim

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

This whole thing is nothing but theatre. Jim

Little WTF needs to brush up on "Due Process" American style!

Moore doesn't have to "put up ANY DEFENSE"!

Now ... Zimmerman DID! In his trial for killing Martin!

And WTF got that one wrong ... .TOO!

[Mr MojoRisin]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Little WTF needs to brush up on "Due Process" American style!

Moore doesn't have to "put up ANY DEFENSE"!

Now ... Zimmerman DID! In his trial for killing Martin!

And WTF got that one wrong ... .TOO!

It's all about "Lets get a Republican", regardless of any evidence or proof. It wouldn't bother me one dam bit if Moore or any other political person regardless of party was charged and convicted of any crime while in office or out as long there is Due Process. This unsubstantiated four decade old bullshit of he said, she said malarkey isn't cutting it. If Moore steps down it would be like admitting to the allocations. If these so called victims can't prove anything Moore should throw a defamation suit up their twats, or if he did indeed commit these acts just openly admit it and move on and get his personal life out the public eye.

Jim

[bamscram]

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

It's all about "Lets get a Republican", regardless of any evidence or proof. It wouldn't bother me one dam bit if Moore or any other political person regardless of party was charged and convicted of any crime while in office or out as long there is Due Process. This unsubstantiated four decade old bullshit of he said, she said malarkey isn't cutting it. If Moore steps down it would be like admitting to the allocations. If these so called victims can't prove anything Moore should throw a defamation suit up their twats, or if he did indeed commit these acts just openly admit it and move on and get his personal life out the public eye.

Jim

If you missed it...

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slate...ool_girls.html

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by bamscram

If you missed it...

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slate...ool_girls.html

You're the jackass that "missed it", Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Your lib-retard Slate article cites the New Yorker which quotes "unnamed sources", innuendo and rumor, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. But in the fine print, the New Yorker actually reports something different than its click-bait headline that other lib-retard outlets are running up the flagpole for jackasses like you to salute, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

Reached by phone on Saturday, [Gadsden police officer named J. D.] Thomas, who lives in the nearby town of Southside, declined to discuss the existence of a ban on Moore at the Gadsden Mall. “I don’t have anything to say about that,” he said. A former manager of the mall, who began working there in the late eighties, confirmed the existence of a ban list, but did not recall Moore being on the list during the manager’s tenure there. Barnes Boyle, who is eighty-six, also managed the mall, from 1981 to 1998. His wife, Brenda, told me that Moore was a longtime acquaintance of his—they went to the Y.M.C.A. together often—and that he planned to vote for him. The recent allegations against Moore, the Boyles thought, are likely liberal propaganda and, as Brenda put it, “a sign of the times.”

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

https://whatthedatasays.com/2017/11/...ore-signature/



Thomas Wictor @ThomasWictor

Well, unretouched CNN photo DEFINITELY shows that "Moore D.A. 12-22-77 Olde Hickory House" was written in different-colored ink than the rest of the inscription.

It appears that this jalopy of an accusation has completely fallen apart. pic.twitter.com/IiA0QP0l2R

JohnP says:
November 14, 2017 at 4:31 am
The “European” style 7 was used in blue ink but not in the black. It’s not written by the same person.

1977 written twice with different 7's, obvious forgery!

[IIFFOFRDB]

fuckem they're 0zombie trash...

[Mr MojoRisin]

Originally Posted by bamscram

If you missed it...

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slate...ool_girls.html

That's really not proof that Moore groped, raped or enticed underage girls to have sex with him. Without official documentation including specific incidents with dates, places and times articles such as these are very misleading. This article specifically states one parent was present when Moore approached her young daughter for a date, lol. Sounds to me he was given consent by the parents of these young girls. I think Moore was compensating these girls for dates and since he was the parents were fine with the idea. Remember we are talking about Alabama, lol.

Jim

[IIFFOFRDB]

Joe Dan Shorty 2:34