2ND AMENDMENT HOTTIES.......A REASON TO FACEBOOK

[Guest010619]

When I was in the Navy I earned medals for sharpshooting with both rifle and pistol. Want to go shooting sometime??

I'd love too.

I myself took a provider out for shooting lessons at the range not long ago.
Then went in later to have my barrel polished.

[JD Barleycorn]

Gabrielle "Gabby" Franco of Top Shot: All Stars. The only woman to make it to the finals. Former Miss Venezuela and Olympic shooter.

[zerodahero]

[zerodahero]

[zerodahero]

[Whirlaway]

[Munchmasterman]

Listen to what the "Queen" of conservatives has to say.

Sounds reasonable to me.

Since Ronnie doesn't really know anything about the difference between a semi and full auto rifle, we'll cut him some slack.

[Whirlaway]

RR was correct; you don't need an AK 47 for hunting or home defense; but it sure as hell helps as a weapon against a tyrannical government......

The 2nd Amendment has very little to do with hunting or self defense and everything with tyranny by government over citizens.

I guess you need to go back to school. The 2nd Amendment and Bill of Rights wasn't scripted to protect the rights of hunters or personal safety !



What did RR have to say about that ?

[JD Barleycorn]

I don't see the problem. I agree that RR was right that the AK-47 is not a weapon for hunting or home defense BUT ONLY IF YOU RECOGNIZE THAT RR WAS WRONG ABOUT THE FUNCTION OF THE WEAPON. Now if RR had been corrected about the machine gun comment then I would wonder what he would say. I do note (and Munchie doesn't) is that RR said he does not want to take away the right of the citizen to shot for sport, hunting, or home defense. That is the important part. People like Munchie don't want to stop at the so-called assault weapon, they want all the guns and your right to self defense.

Thank's for playing, better luck next time.

[Gotyour6]

The second amendment has nothing to do with home defense or hunting. It has to do with arming yourself to defend yourself against anyone including the government.

RR and the rest are wrong. What part of shall not be infringed didnt you understand.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

If they have fully automatic I want fully automatic

Please don't start with nukes etc. Be an adult and not a scared angry liberal.
Guns don't kill any more than a spoon makes you fat.

Mass killing has been done with fire, knives, rocks, bows. If someone is going to go off the deep end then they will find a way to do it.

[Dandito]

Wow, this got off topic fast. Back on track!
Here's one of my favorite Dallas providers sporting a Kel-Tec PMR-30

and something a little larger

and with her sister

[Guest010619]

Mass killing has been done with fire, knives, rocks, bows. If someone is going to go off the deep end then they will find a way to do it.

Even governments do not do mass killings of their own people with bullets. The Nazis made use of starvation, disease, and fire. Mao Tse Tsung sent over 60 million of his countrymen to starve in the early 60's. Stalin about 20 million. They didn't need bullets then. But if the populace had been armed sufficiently, history of that part of the world would have been a lot different.
But your right. Lets stay on topic. If you see Pistol Marks, be sure to bring Ammo... And Viagra.

[zerodahero]

[zerodahero]

[JCM800]