Encounter: Isabel Jade

[austin88998833]

Originally Posted by Parttimehobbyist

This.

Nicely said Austin!

Thanks

[austin88998833]

Originally Posted by Parttimehobbyist

You might have a bit different perspective in 20 years though. Or might not, who knows. All I know is, the only ladies I'm interested in spending time with are the ones who will enjoy it too, not just endure it. If someone had to make an "exception" for me, I would not be able to shake the perception that they were in the "endure it" camp.

I hear ya man and I can understand where you’re coming from.

I do know that her 50/50 rule is there for a valid reason (and it’s not a superficial reason), but I don’t want to speak for her and would rather have guys PM and ask her about it.[/QUOTE]
I didn’t think to ask the Why behind 50/50 rule I just assumed that if you’re 50 lbs overweight and over 50 years old you are certainly at risk for a cardiac event, lol. I may ask her next time I see her what that’s about.

[austin88998833]

Originally Posted by SpankyJ

Honestly, her apparently being the kind of superficial person that even has such a rule puts her on my "don't want to see" list.

I wouldn't take an exception even if it was offered, not that I've ever tried with her. There are plenty of ladies out there that are happy to see me, flaws and all, without me having to beg for their charity in exchange for the privilege of seeing them. But that's just me.

Trying to find an angle to get with someone like that, who would most likely be just trying to conceal her disgust and get it over with? Nah. I don’t care how gorgeous she is, I wouldn’t subject myself to that.

[austin88998833]

Originally Posted by SpankyJ

Maybe so. But I also know a lady who has repeatedly received nasty PMs from her complaining that she’s giving references to guys that she says are not up to her high standards and telling her to stop, like giving a reference to someone who asks for it is the same as actively providing a referral. I’ll have to agree to disagree on this one, as that does indeed seem superficial to me. I’m sure she does have her rationalizations for it though. Don’r really care enough what they are to ask her, and she’d probably tell me to go to hell if I did, so I guess I’ll never know and that’s okay with me.

[Baconman]

I understand what everybody is saying and concerns. I can't help myself but I find myself wanting to schedule an appointment with her. I would have to clear one of the hurdles with the age limit. As someone said she does case by case. Maybe she puts the attitude out there to weed out the freaks. Who knows her reasons. I know one thing, all the reviews seem positive and wanting to go again.

[boblawblog]

many providers clearly state no african american men. isabel's restriction seems along the same lines. whatever her reasons, she can dictate her preferences. while this would not fly in the real world, in this pretend world of ours, anybody can discriminate on anyone for anything.
while i may not agree with or understand this particular restriction, or any restriction, i am glad that isabel is very upfront about hers. it keeps people like spankyj from wasting time, only to be rebuffed personally later down the road. i'd rather someone tell me not to spend time barking up the wrong tree in the first place. just my $.02.
i do meet her qualifications, and i have been in touch with her and hope to meet her soon because it seems like the OP had a fantastic time!

[Guest110920]

Originally Posted by boblawblog

many providers clearly state no african american men. isabel's restriction seems along the same lines. whatever her reasons, she can dictate her preferences. while this would not fly in the real world, in this pretend world of ours, anybody can discriminate on anyone for anything.
while i may not agree with or understand this particular restriction, or any restriction, i am glad that isabel is very upfront about hers. it keeps people like spankyj from wasting time, only to be rebuffed personally later down the road. i'd rather someone tell me not to spend time barking up the wrong tree!

I do agree with this. In fact I considered reaching out when she was in NWA not long ago before I was aware of her restriction. I’m glad I didn’t now.

Once again, I support her right to have whatever restrictions she wants. It was more her manner of communicating it that didn’t sit so well with me.

[austin88998833]

Everyone makes valid points here and I agree with each for whatever that’s worth. It all depends on how much you are willing to put yourself out there and risk a bad experience if you follow through with the visit. I respect each opinion just as some of you stated you respected her right to post whatever restrictions she wanted on who she sees regardless of how it may come across. ‘Nuff said

[Parttimehobbyist]

Austin for president 2020!!

[austin88998833]

Originally Posted by Parttimehobbyist

Austin for president 2020!!

Lol. PTH, the more I think about it, I kinda like the idea, but I don’t think I’ll be ready to run until 2024. Let’s just say I’ve got my reasons, lol. But in 2024 what do you say about serving as my running mate? And how about Spanky serving as my Chief of Staff and campaign manager??? Spanky has already served a full term as the AAOP, Arkansas Ambassador of Pussy, so it seems like a natural move up the political rung, No? It would certainly make for an eclectic mix of political ideologies and diversity is a good thing, right? So guys what say you? It’s not too early to start planning the 2024 campaign

[BK]

I side with SpankyJ on this one. No way I would ever try to "qualify" to see someone. The term silver foxes was coined by younger ladies for a reason.

[Parttimehobbyist]

Originally Posted by austin88998833

Lol. PTH, the more I think about it, I kinda like the idea, but I don’t think I’ll be ready to run until 2024. Let’s just say I’ve got my reasons, lol. But in 2024 what do you say about serving as my running mate? And how about Spanky serving as my Chief of Staff and campaign manager??? Spanky has already served a full term as the AAOP, Arkansas Ambassador of Pussy, so it seems like a natural move up the political rung, No? It would certainly make for an eclectic mix of political ideologies and diversity is a good thing, right? So guys what say you? It’s not too early to start planning the 2024 campaign

Haha! Hells yeah!!

[arealone]

Originally Posted by BK

I side with SpankyJ on this one. No way I would ever try to "qualify" to see someone. The term silver foxes was coined by younger ladies for a reason.

I guess I'm with Spanky and now BK. Since I'm providing the $, isn't that "qualification" enough? And from what I'm reading in her profile, she is no "young" hottie herself. Utilizing the provider age math, in most cases it would put her age closer to mine that some of the people she thinks she should see.


So, given her rate, age, and attitude, I think she doesn't really qualify for the HDH rating. Maybe the HDC rating?

[austin88998833]

Originally Posted by arealone

I guess I'm with Spanky and now BK. Since I'm providing the $, isn't that "qualification" enough? And from what I'm reading in her profile, she is no "young" hottie herself. Utilizing the provider age math, in most cases it would put her age closer to mine that some of the people she thinks she should see.


So, given her rate, age, and attitude, I think she doesn't really qualify for the HDH rating. Maybe the HDC rating?

[BK]

Originally Posted by austin88998833

I bring a bottle of water with me to most incalls for a few reasons.

1: Ladies usually do not have extra water bottles just laying around if they are in a hotel.

2: Walking into a hotel carrying one makes it appear you belong there and are just heading to your room.