It was a liberal meltdown on Twitter tonight and it was glorious

[HDGristle]

And the journalists are returning after Elon's hilarious self-own. Almost 59% voted in favor of ending the suspension "Now"

Anyone want to attack the security of Twitter's votingor how it handles polls?

Here's a fresh Washington Post article, Berry. I know you read them all the time

https://www.washingtonpost.com/techn...acker-doxxing/

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by LayingPipe

The same fake news liars who said they would delete their accounts if Elon bought it are crying about being blocked

Folks used the same language about living the U.S. when X president was elected and never moved. Sarcasm or hyperbole, hypocrisy or accepting defeat. Doesn't really matter. They can still talk shit about it on the internet. And others can shout them down.

@ElonJet remains banned. Musk's still trying to use expand the definition of doxxing. The world continues to turn.

Like sands through the hourglass, so are the Days of our Lives.

Which means Elon has been cast as a revitalized Stefano. Makes sense since the chip he put in Hope's brain was Neuralink

[anmar85]

Personally if I didn't want someone to track my private jet's location using publicly available resources, then I simply wouldn't own one.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Nope and I'm glad you picked up the breadcrumb. Don't focus on the Pool discussion.

Not sure what you are even talking about now. Breadcrumbs and pools? That is not relevant to this thread or me pointing out to you the FAA's PIA privacy program.

In any case, I am not going to let you derail the thread with this

Crazy ass lib journalists were caught doxxing and got suspended.

There are rules against doxxing for good reasons

So do you support doxxing people?

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

And the journalists are returning after Elon's hilarious self-own. Almost 59% voted in favor of ending the suspension "Now"

Self own

Try harder. Elon accomplished what he wanted to. It was a master stroke. In one fell swoop, he:

1. Got the crazy ass leftist media speaking out for free speech

2. Got the crazy ass leftist media speaking out against censorship and people being suspended

3. Got his point across very loud and clear that doxxing is not permitted on Twitter and will be met with swift suspensions

4. Provided far greater transparency than Twitter has ever provided into the decision and by letting people vote this time on whether to let the dumb fucks who got suspended for doxxing back after a 1 day suspension or after a 7 day suspension.

That is all part of how Elon is restoring trust on twitter from the previous corrupt leftist regime. It was a major win all around for Elon. Anyone with any basic common sense can see that

[HDGristle]

There's no derailing. The journalists understand that Elon's massive liberal expansion of what doxxing is was bullshit. And that trying to ban them over coverage that had a link to something that isn't doxxing was a bullshit power play.

I don't support doxxing. But this wasn't that because you and Elon say it is or because he updated Twitter TOS. Which part why the journalists were upset and which you gloss over and neither you nor Elon support free speech. You support free speech as you define it. Which is part of why Elon bought Twitter. To have control over free speech and define it as he sees fit. And restrict it when he doesn't.

Which is another reason the journalists pushed back.

But you will gloss over those details because you dislike liberal journalists and don't actually care about the facts.

[berryberry]

LOL - it certainly was doxxing no matter how much you pretend it wasn't

"Doxxing is the act of revealing identifying information about someone online, such as their real name, home address, workplace, phone, financial, and other personal information. That information is then circulated to the public — without the victim's permission."

You say you do not support doxxing yet here you are supporting doxxing as these lib propogandists shared personal location information without the victim's permission

I don't care who did it or who the victim is, whether it is Elon Musk or some dumb fuck lib like AOC. I will speak out against all doxxing unlike you.

[HDGristle]

So you finally admit you totally disregard the malicious intent component.

By that definition the phone book was doxxing, which is not what doxxing was ever about. It's about unmasking with malicious intent.

Didn't you support the previous doxxing of election officials? Or was that someone else?

[berryberry]

Nope, I don't disregard anything

There is always malicious intent involved when someone discloses personal information against a victim's wishes.

Unlike you who were silent and condoned it, I have spoken out before against Supreme Court justices being doxxed

[HDGristle]

Ah, my bad. The invisible silent malice clause in that definition was hard to see... and is still highly ridiculous.

But let's pretend that only vocal Sandbox posts show what people condone. This is the center of some folks' whole universe. Do you want to open that Pandora's box of utter bullshit?

Here's a better read

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/event...ng-controversy

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Ah, my bad. The invisible silent malice clause in that definition was hard to see... and is still highly ridiculous.

So you finally admit you condone doxxing. Ok then, enough said

[HDGristle]

Those are some "mighty fine" words you keep trying to put in my mouth without consent. No means no, berry. You don't have my consent. And it's no until you gain consent.

Won't even offer me dinner before trying to put things in my mouth. Typical monger.

[chizzy]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Those are some "mighty fine" words you keep trying to put in my mouth without consent. No means no, berry. You don't have my consent. And it's no until you gain consent.

Won't even offer me dinner before trying to put things in my mouth. Typical monger.

Well kiss my grits, you finally made a post that I didn't have to take the time to look up a damn word I didn't understand 🙃 thank you

Carry on

[berryberry]

LOL - yeah, tell me there is no malicious intent when you try and blackmail someone

“It’s not harassment but I’ll go away if you give me $50,000 or a Tesla.”

https://twitter.com/i/status/1604304945473150976

[HDGristle]

Their DM's and messages on this were widely covered. You're welcome to see what you want in the exchanges, because they've been shared. And Elon himself didn't file charges against him in the moment. Hasn't been calling it anything like extortion. Affirmed his intent to protect the account as free speech on Twitter. And there have been no charges filed against the "stalker" used to justify this. Alex Jones might see that as a full blown case for this being a false flag with a crisis actor to divert our attention and frame the narrative.

Going back to Nov/Dec 21 exchange, Thomas Barabbi of your beloved NY Post covered this on 01/27/22.
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon...account-2022-1

Other coverage
https://www.protocol.com/elon-musk-flight-tracker

https://interestingengineering.com/c...te-for-the-fun

https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/30/busin...ter/index.html

https://www.businessinsider.com/elon...account-2022-1

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/03/t...-tracking.html

Earlier this year, Sweeney indicated that he'd even accept a ride on his plane and an interview he could record and post.

The irony here, being, you're only now picking up the CNN interview because it's gone viral, again... by people who aren't trying to look at all the facts. Just enough for your confirmation bias to set in. Elon's calling even more attention to this. Going back on his own word. Failing to live up to his own principles.

Remember that Sweeney's bot doesn't know who is on Musk's plane. Look at what's actually being tracked and shared.

Look... breadcrumb time... at what Elon himself shares.

Not about the hilariously unhinged bullshit about assassination coordinates, mind you.