Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

WTF · 10-28-2012, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

I am looking for the straw man in your argument COG............don't see one.

Look at the question/request and look at the lack of answering the question.

His whole answer is a strawman. In fact I think he is the Scarecrow in Oz!

CuteOldGuy · 10-28-2012, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

That was not the question.

Which party did you align with? See this example? Is it to hard for you and Whirly to understand? You and the other Tea Folks won't do this. Why? Does it come up Nazi? [/SIZE][/I]

Yeah. Play the Nazi card you plagiarizing infant.

98% Gary Johnson
96% Ron Paul

Do the math, asshole.

CuteOldGuy · 10-28-2012, 11:54 AM

This whole thread is WPF's strawman to draw attention to himself and away from the real issues. We've done this before at least twice, but it doesn't count unless we do it HIS way. He's such an adolescent, fraudulent plagiarizer. He's been discovered to be a big time liar, and now he's trying to become "important" again, by demanding we play his game his way. Fuck him.

IIFFOFRDB · 10-28-2012, 12:17 PM

Romney 88%
Johnson 88%
Goode? 81%
0 36%

Texas 59%
American 56%

R 92%
Lib 74%
Dem 41%
Grn 21%

Fuckers 100%

WTF · 10-28-2012, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Romney 88%
Johnson 88%
Goode? 81%
0 36%

Texas 59%
American 56%

R 92%
Lib 74%
Dem 41%
Grn 21%

Fuckers 100%

Thank you IIFFOFRDB. We are tied in the Lib count. I find is funny that we are the exact same way there and opposite in other Party likes. My Green Party was off the chart and I do not even know shit about them!

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

This whole thread is WPF's strawman to draw attention to himself and away from the real issues. We've done this before at least twice, but it doesn't count unless we do it HIS way. He's such an adolescent, fraudulent plagiarizer. He's been discovered to be a big time liar, and now he's trying to become "important" again, by demanding we play his game his way. Fuck him.

Evidently COG has trouble completing tasks. He was asked to reveal his party matchups. I wasn't demanding shit. I just said that I bet my Lib party ID was higher than his. Evidently I hit a nerve.

What is the real issue btw?

john_deere · 10-28-2012, 01:21 PM

yes.

joe bloe · 10-28-2012, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john_deere

yes.

Can you be more concise?

I B Hankering · 10-28-2012, 01:46 PM

R 90%
Lib 55%
Grn 35%
Dem 15%

Guest123018-4 · 10-28-2012, 05:50 PM

94 Romney
90 Gary Johnson
89 Virgil Goode
25 Obama

I side with
56% Texas Voters
53% American Voters

Guest123018-4 · 10-28-2012, 05:53 PM

If Libertarians would get into the Republican party and move it more toward the Libertarian leanings of a great number of Republicans the party would be unbeatable except for a very few areas.

LordBeaverbrook · 10-28-2012, 06:17 PM

WTF +1
Parties you side with...

91% Green

84% Democrat

43% Libertarian

7% Republican

Funny thing is that most Republicans won't admit that Lincoln, Roosevelt, Eisenhower and even Nixon would be run out of they party as RINOs these days. There was a question on the national parks that Roosevelt started, yet the R-party would drill, drill, drill there and allow any other coal, mineral or gas prospecting not caring if they were destroyed or not. Eisenhower funded the national highway system to rev up the economy in the early 50's when it was still sluggish from WWII, but today no Republican but a RINO would dare support a smart grid or high-speed rail. On and on and on, any Republican position that Dems compromised to meet half way or even adopted (one reason they hated Clinton with such a burning passion even though he isn't black) they have to run totally away from, especially when it makes sense.

These are all pretty black and white questions and the issues however are not all that black and white unfortunately, no matter how much the ideologs here and on the right would like to believe it to be.

acp5762 · 10-28-2012, 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

BO 89%

Gary Johnson 88%

Evidently I need to vote for the Green Party as that seems to be the political Party that I line up with!

I don't know how you arrived at this. Maybe your views go from one extreme to the next. I got high marks for Gary Johnson too, 86% and Romney 75% and Obama was 35%. I don't know that much about Gary Johnson other than he's a Libertarian. Anyway I thought it was very interesting that your percentages between Obama and Johnson were close.

WTF · 10-28-2012, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by acp5762

I don't know how you arrived at this. Maybe your views go from one extreme to the next. I got high marks for Gary Johnson too, 86% and Romney 75% and Obama was 35%. I don't know that much about Gary Johnson other than he's a Libertarian. Anyway I thought it was very interesting that your percentages between Obama and Johnson were close.

I did too. That is why I asked folks to post their %'s. I have no idea what the Green Party is even about but according to the test, they match my wants.

COG seems to be having trouble posting his total %'s. Probably got a low score on the Lib thingy.

acp5762 · 10-28-2012, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

I did too. That is why I asked folks to post their %'s. I have no idea what the Green Party is even about but according to the test, they match my wants.

COG seems to be having trouble posting his total %'s. Probably got a low score on the Lib thingy.

After seeing other posts it seems Gary Johnson frequently had high scores. He could never do well in a political campaigne as a Libertarian, but as a Dem or Rep he possibly could. If that was ever the case I probably would support him.

joe bloe · 10-28-2012, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by austxjr

WTF +1
Parties you side with...

91% Green

84% Democrat

43% Libertarian

7% Republican

Funny thing is that most Republicans won't admit that Lincoln, Roosevelt, Eisenhower and even Nixon would be run out of they party as RINOs these days. There was a question on the national parks that Roosevelt started, yet the R-party would drill, drill, drill there and allow any other coal, mineral or gas prospecting not caring if they were destroyed or not. Eisenhower funded the national highway system to rev up the economy in the early 50's when it was still sluggish from WWII, but today no Republican but a RINO would dare support a smart grid or high-speed rail. On and on and on, any Republican position that Dems compromised to meet half way or even adopted (one reason they hated Clinton with such a burning passion even though he isn't black) they have to run totally away from, especially when it makes sense.

These are all pretty black and white questions and the issues however are not all that black and white unfortunately, no matter how much the ideologs here and on the right would like to believe it to be.

The Republican Party doesn't run the RINO's out of the party. It runs them for the presidency. Both of the Bushes, Bob Dole, John McCain, and Mitt Romney are all RINO's. The Republicans haven't given the presidential nomination to a conservative since Reagan.