Romney Refuses to Answer Questions on FEMA

[CJ7]

For the past two years, House Republicans have continued to deprioritize the security forces protecting State Department personnel around the world. In fiscal year 2011, lawmakers shaved $128 million off of the administration's request for embassy security funding. House Republicans drained off even more funds in fiscal year 2012 -- cutting back on the department's request by $331 million

ouch ... right in the balls.

too bad IB's are so damn numb

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by markroxny

Maybe it had something to do with the republicans cutting funding for embassy security!



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...n_1954912.html

Lame, lame, lame, marks-rocks-with-pee. That lame-ass excuse has already been trotted out and shot down like the turkey it is.

In testimony Wednesday [10 October 2012] before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was questioned:

“It has been suggested that budget cuts are responsible for a lack of security in Benghazi, and I’d like to ask Miss Lamb,” said Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R., Calif.). “You made this decision personally. Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which lead you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Lamb responded, “No, sir.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...katrina-trinko



And as a reminder, here's what Senator Paul said -- again. Note how he is displeased with the way the Odumbo DID spend money:


Obama, Where the H-- Were the Marines?


I have some questions and you get presidential candidates up here, so I want you to ask the President this when he comes up here: Where the hell were the Marines?

In Libya, where were the Marines?

There were no uniformed Marines guarding our ambassador?

Where do you think the most dangerous embassy in the world is? It's got to be Libya or Iraq.

In Iraq, I think they've got 17,000 people guarding the ambassador. They're not all Marines, but there's probably several hundred Marines, but there's a host of armed people guarding the ambassador. We have a fortress guarding the ambassador there.

We didn't have any uniformed Marines? There was personnel, a 16-person security team.

If the President comes up here, ask him: Why in the hell did you send them home? They specifically requested to stay.

Col. Wood, who is head of the security team, says he sent the cables: I want to stay in Libya because it's unsafe and the ambassador is unsafe.

The President says the buck stops here, ask him where in the hell were the Marines? Ask him, where the hell was that 16-person security team?

And then finally ask him: What happened to the plane? There was a DC-3 there supposed to be able to help people out of the country or to move about the country, they took their plane.

They took their plane on May 4 of this year. You know what happened on May 8 of this year, four days later? The State Department spent $108,000 buying a new electrical charging station to green up the Vienna embassy.

So you have to ask yourself, is the green initiative, is the global warming campaign, more important than the security of an embassy?

Greening up the Vienna Embassy. You know, the electric car, it's subsidized $250,000 per car. We probably spent $1 million to buy these electric cars to make a political statement in Vienna.

We spent $100,000 for an electrical charging station to show off how green we were, but we wouldn't have one Marine guarding our embassy, we wouldn't allow 16 personnel to stay in Libya, we wouldn't allow them a plane, but we've got enough money to make a show of a very politicized agenda by the President.

I think it's inexcusable and if he says the buck stops here, someone should be fired.

by U.S. Senator Dr. Rand Paul


http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Ar...2#.UIo2lW_A9rM

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

For the past two years, House Republicans have continued to deprioritize the security forces protecting State Department personnel around the world. In fiscal year 2011, lawmakers shaved $128 million off of the administration's request for embassy security funding. House Republicans drained off even more funds in fiscal year 2012 -- cutting back on the department's request by $331 million

ouch ... right in the balls.

too bad IB's are so damn numb

The facts are lined up against the Kool Aid League, and their arguments to deflect are so bogus. They ignore that Dimocrats ALSO voted to reduce State Department funding.

In testimony Wednesday [10 October 2012] before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was questioned:

“It has been suggested that budget cuts are responsible for a lack of security in Benghazi, and I’d like to ask Miss Lamb,” said Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R., Calif.). “You made this decision personally. Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which lead you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Lamb responded, “No, sir.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...katrina-trinko

[acp5762]

Originally Posted by CJ7

seems I remember you took a shot at a typo I made, asshloe to be specific on one of LL's dumbass threads, then got a hearty LOL from IB and crew ... Ive seen you make a few honest typos and let it slide simply because most everyone makes a few typos, but since you opened that door I think I'll walk in and say hello to blatant ignorance

dieing .... really Einstein?

its DYING.

as for the rest of your post, its a damn good thing Willard isnt a capitalist, and no president before Obie cam along was either .... isnt it?

peace... OUT!

Thats all ya got is a misspelled word. For your information Obama is a flat out Socialist. If he's re-elected this country will over time conform to Socialism. By the way you spelled came wrong it's not cam. Practice what you preach dumbass.

[Little Stevie]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Douchebags can't discuss Romney's policies at all, can you!

NO WONDER YOU'RE HIJACKING EVERY THREAD!!!

Good luck boys. See you from the winner's circle!

My God, is there an uglier woman in American than Michelle Malkin?

Well done! This is exactly why I have I.B. Stoooopid on "ignore" and generally point out the stupidity so evident in the posts of the leading "serial thread hijackers" like Marshall, COF, Barleybrains and Whirly.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Little Stevie

[SIZE=3]
My God, is there an uglier woman in American than Michelle Malkin?

Yes, YOU!!!


The facts are lined up against the Kool Aid League, and their arguments to deflect are so bogus. They ignore that Dimocrats ALSO voted to reduce State Department funding.

In testimony Wednesday [10 October 2012] before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was questioned:

“It has been suggested that budget cuts are responsible for a lack of security in Benghazi, and I’d like to ask Miss Lamb,” said Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R., Calif.). “You made this decision personally. Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which lead you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Lamb responded, “No, sir.”


http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...katrina-trinko

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Yes, YOU!!!


The facts are lined up against the Kool Aid League, and their arguments to deflect are so bogus. They ignore that Dimocrats ALSO voted to reduce State Department funding.

In testimony Wednesday [10 October 2012] before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diploooomatic security, was questioned:

“It has been suggested that budget cuts are responsible for a lack of security in Benghazi, and I’d like to ask Miss Lamb,” said Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R., Calif.). “You made this decision personally. Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which lead you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Lamb responded, “No, sir.”


http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...katrina-trinko

Is that where he stopped, IBLyin? You tend to quote every third word or so from an article if it supports your ludicrous claims.

WE all know you do.


MAYBY THAT'S WHY YOU FEEL YOU HAVE TO REPEAT EVERYTHING SO MANY TIMES!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Is that where he stopped, IBLyin? You tend to quote every third word or so from an article if it supports your ludicrous claims.

WE all know you do.


MAYBY THAT'S WHY YOU FEEL YOU HAVE TO REPEAT EVERYTHING SO MANY TIMES!

Once again you've demonstrated your ineptness and gross stupidity. You've just admitted you're to ignorant to figure out how to click on a hyperlink, Assup!