Quote:
Originally Posted by princeclubhopper
WD is obviously extremely confused or simply not that bright. One thing is for sure, he absolutely DOES NOT CARE ABOUT TRAFFICKING. He’s been asked over and over to simply name the trafficking locations so they can be avoided, but refuses to do so. And the final nail in the coffin is what he stated above. He said he does not care if Aroma reopens or not. How is that possible if your purpose is to expose and end trafficking?
|
If he learned from a woman inside one of the locations that it was, indeed, a trafficking location, he could very well put that woman, and all of the women working there, at risk by disclosing the location.
Do you want him to do that?
If he were to report any specific location to law enforcement, it's possible that the women could end up being "rescued" by law enforcement and then they could be at risk of being deported or they and their families, whatever their location, could be at risk of being harmed.
Do you want that to happen?
If he were NOT concerned, then revealing the location to us would not trouble his conscience. It clearly does because HE understands the ramifications of doing so.
Do you understand those ramifications? Clearly not, because if any of the people asking what places to avoid would stop to think for a minute or two, they'd realize this.
WD and TT may not be able to mount effective campaigns to save trafficking victims, but they've both decided to no longer support an industry that engages in sex trafficking. They've chosen to be very careful about where they engage in this "hobby" in order to avoid supporting trafficking. They've chosen to let us know about their choice and have asked us to consider doing the same.
Most of you are capable of critical thought.
Most of you are capable of doing your own research.
Most of you can open your own damn eyes to see what may be strong indicators of human trafficking in the places you frequent.
NONE of you need to believe
anything that WD and TT have said in order to do ANY of that.
If you CAN do any of that, then you have NO reason to have a problem with what they're suggesting.
If all you can do is attempt to discredit or dismiss their concerns then the fact is that you don't want to risk the cognitive dissonance of the mature consideration that you might be supporting the trafficking of human beings in order to hypothetically get your dick tugged because you're terrified that no one who isn't enslaved is going to ever touch it again. Just a theory.
Also, I made some sentences really long intentionally.
If you can't get through them then you're probably part of the problem.
