Quote:
Originally Posted by CivilBarrister
There were many Army SharpShooters using the same weapon TRY to replicate the shotting and it was impossible for any of them to get off the 3 shots in the amount of time of the actual shooting.
|
How many where left handed and used the same weapon? none! Lee was a lefty! Ohh and a Marine! He practiced too! Ohh and they sucked too!
Really 1.5 seconds a round isn't a challenge to a trained rifleman. Remember the first round is chambered and ready to go, you send it, start the clock, rack it, send it (second shot), rack it, send it (third shot) stop the clock. The clock starts on the first shot, so it a 2.2 second split. This is a borderline joke for any real rifleman. Say "One thousand and one and two an.." and that's the split time, not really that hard. CBS had no issue recreating the shots either. They aired the shots on national tv.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CivilBarrister
Also, kinda odd that Oswald was shot within a few minutes by Ruby who was then immediately shot.
|
You mean TWO DAYS after Lee Oswald was arrested for the murder of JFK? And after the shooting of a Dallas police officer. DPD was moving him when Ruby shot him, remember that?
To date the best review of the Warren report was by CBS that aired in 67, here are the
outlines of the reports. None of the consperciy theorys of the day were found to have any credence. They tested all of them.
The most serious consperency theroy came about in the 70's House Select Commitee on Assassinations and the conclusion of that debacle has been refuted scientifically and by the principle participant, the motor cycle cop who's mic was miced up. The ass hat in charge of that investigation arbitrarily placed him where he was not and concluded there was a 4th shot based what is knowned as fictitious placement of him during the assassination. Dont you find it funny that the cop in question would never have never been called to testify before congress before they made a finding? The cop even told this tool he wasn't at this fictitious location during the shooting. Why not let him testify? Why not put it in the public record? It's always easer to belive in the fanciful than the harsh reality that a single communist nut job can kill our president, that's why. That is the sad reality.
I could get into how JFK's geopolitical view was a total 180 of the Oliver Stone revisionist give me money horse *#$@ theory, but who cares, the domino theory could have never come form JFK, he just loved commies! Hmm in the 63 interview with David Brinkely he told America he believed in the "so called domino theory." Ahh a commie fighter through and through. China can't get too big me must fight them on the undetermined lands in SE Asia! That was pretty much the interview. Look it up for yourself if you doubt history.
Hay CB I know I quoted you here and honestly this subject pisses me off but I really am just using your post to make some very real points that nobody has made which is a sad issue to me. This is hard history that has been hashed over and over and over and over. I hope you don't take this as a direct attack towards you cause that is not my aim at all.
