Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Guest040616 · 09-10-2012, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Say what you will, Romney got a 1 point bounce, if that's what you want to call it.

While Obama seems to have received a welcome "bounce," Romney's more closely resembled a well deserved thud!

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...ney/?hpt=hp_t2

Doove · 09-10-2012, 05:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doove

When you have to go running to what i said in another thread to defend yourself over what i said here, in this context, you lose.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

So, I can't hold you responsible for what you said in another thread and try to use it against you?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ducbutter

Hey Jdriller!

Haven't heard from you since you were telling us you paid 35% of your total income in federal taxes.

Whatchya been up to?

You lose.

Apparently you guys don't understand what the term "in this context" means.

NG: "Stop calling me dumb."

Doove: "I didn't call you dumb."

NG: "But, well, you did call me dumb 3 weeks ago."

Doove: "Maybe i did, maybe i didn't, but i didn't call you dumb here."

NG: "But you did call me dumb 3 weeks ago, so don't pretend that that isn't the same as calling me dumb here."

Doove: "UGH!"

Ducbutter · 09-10-2012, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doove

Apparently you guys don't understand what the term "in this context" means.

NG: "Stop calling me dumb."

Doove: "I didn't call you dumb."

NG: "But, well, you did call me dumb 3 weeks ago."

Doove: "Maybe i did, maybe i didn't, but i didn't call you dumb here."

NG: "But you did call me dumb 3 weeks ago, so don't pretend that that isn't the same as calling me dumb here."

Doove: "UGH!"

Seems pretty clear that you brought up something the guy had said in a previous thread in an effort to undermine his credibility in a new thread or context.

joe bloe · 09-10-2012, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Yeah. Like Doove's time is so valuable.

It's my understanding, Doofus is a government employee. If that's the case, the odds are, his job is overpaid, makework, redundant, civil service, unionized, can't be fired and affirmative action; in a word, parasitic.

Most government employees don't really work ever, in terms of actually doing something of value. More often than not, the so called work of most government employees is detrimental to the public good. The American public would be better served if most government employees just got paid to stay home.

JD Barleycorn · 09-10-2012, 09:43 AM

http://www.dickmorris.com/obama-thug...aign=dmreports

Obama thugs influencing, or trying to, influencing polling results.

Randy4Candy · 09-10-2012, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

http://www.dickmorris.com/obama-thug...aign=dmreports

Obama thugs influencing, or trying to, influencing polling results.

LOL, "thugs!" Wonder what those gun-totin' fat, white guys wre in the 2010 TPunk "revolution?" Fugitives from the PTA meeting?

CuteOldGuy · 09-10-2012, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joe bloe

It's my understanding, Doofus is a government employee. If that's the case, the odds are, his job is overpaid, makework, redundant, civil service, unionized, can't be fired and affirmative action; in a word, parasitic.

Most government employees don't really work ever, in terms of actually doing something of value. More often than not, the so called work of most government employees is detrimental to the public good. The American public would be better served if most government employees just got paid to stay home.

Well, that explains a lot.

Doove · 09-10-2012, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ducbutter

Seems pretty clear that you brought up something the guy had said in a previous thread in an effort to undermine his credibility in a new thread or context.

I did no such thing. NG hasn't even claimed i did any such thing. But if you need to believe that out of your desperation to make me the bad guy, knock yourself out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by joe bloe

It's my understanding, Doofus is a government employee.

Factually incorrect, so the point of the rest of your post was what?

Ducbutter · 09-10-2012, 04:25 PM

[QUOTE=Doove;3173095]I did no such thing. NG hasn't even claimed i did any such thing. But if you need to believe that out of your desperation to make me the bad guy, knock yourself out.

/QUOTE]

That's absolutely laughable.

Doove · 09-10-2012, 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ducbutter

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doove

I did no such thing. NG hasn't even claimed i did any such thing. But if you need to believe that out of your desperation to make me the bad guy, knock yourself out.

That's absolutely laughable.

You're voting for Romney, ain'tcha?

Ducbutter · 09-10-2012, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doove

You're voting for Romney, ain'tcha?

That question is not germane to this topic. You're deflecting.
Face it. You're a loser by your own defenition.

CJ7 · 09-10-2012, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ducbutter

That question is not germane to this topic. You're deflecting.
Face it. You're a loser by your own defenition.

sure it is, read the OP

Doove · 09-10-2012, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

Then quit making statements like "you and your kind" which you did on another thread.

That comment was made after i made it clear i didn't do that in this thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ducbutter

Seems pretty clear that you brought up something the guy had said in a previous thread in an effort to undermine his credibility in a new thread or context.

I never brought up anything he said in a previous thread. Frankly, the only way i knew you were talking to me with that comment was that you quoted me, and you don't like me. The meaning behind the comment itself could only be applied to him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ducbutter

That question is not germane to this topic. You're deflecting.
Face it. You're a loser by your own defenition.

The best part is, even if i did what you and he want to say i did, so what? He only accused me of painting him with the same brush as i paint other posters. And that morphed into you accusing me of using a quote of his in another thread to undercut his credibility.

You two need to get together and get your stories straight. That, or you just need to learn to pay better attention.

Ducbutter · 09-10-2012, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJ7

sure it is, read the OP

The original post was addressed to Joe Blow and concerned a recent poll that showed that Obama's statistical advantage is growing. How in the world is that related to who I am voting for?

Ducbutter · 09-10-2012, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doove

That comment was made after i made it clear i didn't do that in this thread.

I never brought up anything he said in a previous thread. Frankly, the only way i knew you were talking to me with that comment was that you quoted me, and you don't like me. The meaning behind the comment itself could only be applied to him.

The best part is, even if i did what you and he want to say i did, so what? He only accused me of painting him with the same brush as i paint other posters. And that morphed into you accusing me of using a quote of his in another thread to undercut his credibility.

You two need to get together and get your stories straight. That, or you just need to learn to pay better attention.

Are you kidding me?
On 9/4 jdriller started a thread by posting a link to an article by Thomas Sowell. Your first and only post in the thread referenced something he said in a previous thread that you obviously found incredulous. I'm sure you did that in an effort to bolster his credibility here.