You can't please everyone...

[Still Looking]

Could this be an example of "WHY" Whispers feels they need help in San Antonio?

[canyonman]

Originally Posted by Still Looking

Your still NOT getting it Canyon. WHY are board members talking about ROS information in a thread when like yourself YOU know its ROS information. And yes we all have lives and we ALL make mistakes. Thanks for pointing out the obvious.

Like myself?
You are wrong , I have not talked about anything concerning what should have been ROS content.
My comments concern her photos, a subject that has been out in public before..

[Guest062114-5]

Correct Canyonman...it was mentioned before (like I mentioned).

[Still Looking]

Originally Posted by canyonman

Like myself?
You are wrong , I have not talked about anything concerning what should have been ROS content.
My comments concern her photos, a subject that has been out in public before..

Then my comments don't pertain to you now do they?

[Guest062114-5]

The only possible solution here is to delete the entire thread since editing the original post would leave it largely unintelligible, and not by any fault of Cara's. Cara, Tracy and I all read the information and commented on it.

The ROS is out there and no amount of Mind Erasers will make it go away...

http://www.drinksmixer.com/drink5375.html

[fluffy kitten]

Can't win them all

[canyonman]

Originally Posted by Still Looking

Then my comments don't pertain to you now do they?

Yes, you did include me SL, you post so much you forget what you post just minutes earlier.
You said "like yourself"... go back and read for yourself... I'll be waiting for an apology... I won't hold my breath

[Guest081519]

The issue of the provider using photos that are not her is being handled.

The fact that the ROS was in full view for most of the night… Well, we can't put that cat back in the bag.

Feel free to discuss the photograph issue openly. I cannot edit the commentary above and pretend it was not displayed for everyone to see.

Please do not bring any other subjects that were discussed in the ROS from this point on.

[Guest062114-5]

Thanks JJ, you handled this quite well! Just to be clear, we can discuss what's contained in this thread, but not anything that was in the ROS but that hasn't already been addressed, correct?

Not that I'm dying to say more, LOL...but just in case.

[Guest081519]

Originally Posted by LilMynx69

Thanks JJ, you handled this quite well! Just to be clear, we can discuss what's contained in this thread, but not anything that was in the ROS but that hasn't already been addressed, correct?

Not that I'm dying to say more, LOL...but just in case.

That is correct.

[Still Looking]

Originally Posted by Still Looking

Your still NOT getting it Canyon. WHY are board members talking about ROS information in a thread when like yourself YOU know its ROS information. And yes we all have lives and we ALL make mistakes. Thanks for pointing out the obvious.

Originally Posted by canyonman

Yes, you did include me SL, you post so much you forget what you post just minutes earlier.
You said "like yourself"... go back and read for yourself... I'll be waiting for an apology... I won't hold my breath

Canyon I most certainly did NOT state you were discussing ROS information. I stated "you" knew it was ROS. You did know didn't you?

[Guest062114-5]

Actually, it became Cara's information once she posted it, not just ROS. So, I really don't think it matters at this point at all.

[canyonman]

Originally Posted by Still Looking

Canyon I most certainly did NOT state you were discussing ROS information. I stated "you" knew it was ROS. You did know didn't you?

SL, I was saying her photos had been discussed in the open forums long before this thread even exsisted...

[Still Looking]

Originally Posted by JJ

The issue of the provider using photos that are not her is being handled.

The fact that the ROS was in full view for most of the night… Well, we can't put that cat back in the bag.

Feel free to discuss the photograph issue openly. I cannot edit the commentary above and pretend it was not displayed for everyone to see.

Please do not bring any other subjects that were discussed in the ROS from this point on.

JJ I'll stand by your judgment but....if by accident the OP posted real life Intel or Mokoa's home address would that be edited out of the thread? I bet it would be gone in a flash. Many MODS have taken entire threads to the back room to complete editing. The fact ROS Intel was posted by accident should NOT make a difference. It's ROS info and should be deleted. The fact that what was revealed by accident even if it was openly discussed before is still the OP'S ROS. And the fact that he posted 50 other reviews as well should have ZERO bearing on the issue. He made a mistake and it should be corrected once discovered! Am I wrong on this?

[Guest081519]

Originally Posted by Still Looking

Canyon I most certainly did NOT state you were discussing ROS information. I stated "you" knew it was ROS. You did know didn't you?

Originally Posted by canyonman

SL, I was saying her photos had been discussed in the open forums long before this thread even exsisted...

This seems to be an issue just between the two of you. Would you please take this off the boards and figure it out on your own.

The topic of this discussion is SweetCara's response to a No review.

Let's not continue to argue who outed the ROS information that was not in the ROS brackets of her review.

It has already been established that the information was outside of the brackets for most of last night. There is no need to continue to argue who is right or wrong on this matter.

I am also not going to become involved in this argument and will start issuing warnings and points if it this thread continues to be derailed.