Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF
I'm not a lawyer...but I would need to see what law was broken before sending anyone to jail.
|
But you know that is not how this game is played.
If a special prosecutor is appointed, then the Administration will go into a defensive mode. They will circle the wagons, a certain panic will set in. Since multitudes of people will have been involved in all of this, they will start trying to get everybody's story straight.
But it never works. Some lower level hack will panic, (the thought of time in Leavenworth does that), and the story will have to be modified, but since you are already locked into half truths so to make it look right at a given moment, everybody will forget what they were supposed to say and start trying to cover their own asses.
Congress will catch one person in a lie, then another, and next thing you know, we have, "what did the President know, and when did he know it".
They NEVER get you for the "crime", which in most cases is rather minor. They get you under oath, telling half truths and using talking points, and you then realize that lying before Congress can land your ass in jail.
Right now, it's all about protecting Hillary. She is the future for keeping the White House till some of us die of old age. I still think that the whole "crime" in the Benghazi thing was not the ineptitude shown after the attack, but the ineptitude that was shown before. Any body with an ounce of common sense knows that in a Hot Spot such as that, you do not leave your embassy with virtually no protection, especially on the anniversary of one of the greatest victories the Islamic Terrorist can claim against the Western Civilizations. All done in the name "don't offend the Muslims"
The question is, how many political hacks does it take to sink a Presidency? Even a future one? History, as in John Dean, tells us only one,