Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 267
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70799
biomed163389
Yssup Rider61083
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48712
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42885
The_Waco_Kid37233
CryptKicker37224
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-02-2012, 12:44 PM   #31
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
Of course I have to point out to WTF, Big Tits, and others that you can no longer complain about the Supreme Court decision of 2000. You have all been whining about that for years erroneously. They did not decided the election but they did decided whether Florida could legally change the rules after the fact. You have all been complaining about what the Supreme court did but now you laugh because the SCOTUS decided your way even though there have been allegations by CBS (not FOX news) that some corruption was involved. So you should all publicly admit AND NEVER SAY IT AGAIN that the SCOTUS was right in 2000.

you wrote that all by yourself didnt you?

CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 12:59 PM   #32
Maxx
Valued Poster
 
Maxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 14, 2009
Location: Canyon Lake
Posts: 1,037
Encounters: 17
Default

I agree, he should resign his position, but unfortunately, he can't be impeached for for making a ruling. He has to break the law someway or another and be brought up on charges.



Under normal circumstances, a Supreme Court justice is awarded a lifetime commission.

A Supreme Court Justice may be impeached by the House of Representatives and removed from office if convicted in a Senate trial, but only for the same types of offenses that would trigger impeachment proceedings for any other government official under Articles I and II of the Constitution.

Article III, Section 1 states that judges of Article III courts shall hold their offices "during good behavior." "The phrase "good behavior" has been interpreted by the courts to equate to the same level of seriousness 'high crimes and misdemeanors" encompasses.

In addition, any federal judge may prosecuted in the criminal courts for criminal activity. If found guilty of a crime in a federal district court, the justice would face the same type of sentencing any other criminal defendant would. The district court could not remove him/her from the Bench. However, any justice found guilty in the criminal courts of any felony would certainly be impeached and, if found guilty, removed from office.

In the United States, impeachment is most often used to remove corrupt lower-court federal judges from office, but it's not unusual to find disgruntled special interest groups circulating petitions on the internet calling for the impeachment of one or all members of the High Court.

The Impeachment Process

Impeachment is a two-step process; the impeachment phase is similar to a Grand Jury hearing, where charges (called "articles of impeachment") are presented and the House of Representatives determines whether the evidence is sufficient to warrant a trial. If the House vote passes by a simple majority, the defendant is "impeached," and proceeds to trial in the Senate.

The House of Representatives indicts the accused on articles of impeachment, and, if impeached, the Senate conducts a trial to determine the party's guilt or innocence.

The Senate trial, while analogous to a criminal trial, only convenes for the purpose of determining whether a Justice, the President (or another officeholder) should be removed from office on the basis of the evidence presented at impeachment.

At the trial a committee from the House of Representatives, called "Managers," act as the prosecutors. Per constitutional mandate (Article I, Section 3), the Chief Justice of the United States (Supreme Court) must preside over the Senate trial of the President. If any other official is on trial, an "Impeachment Trial Committee" of Senators act as the presiding judges to hear testimony and evidence against the accused, which is then presented as a report to the remained of the Senate. The full Senate no longer participates in the hearing phase of the removal trial. This procedure came into practice in 1986 when the Senate amended its rules and procedures for impeachment and has been contested by several federal court judges, but the Supreme Court has declined to interfere in the process, calling the issue a political, not legal, matter.

At the conclusion of the trial, the full Senate votes and must return a two-thirds Super Majority for conviction. Convicted officials are removed from office immediately and barred from holding future office. The Senate trial, while analogous to a criminal trial, only convenes for the purpose of determining whether a Justice, the President (or another officeholder) should be removed from office on the basis of the evidence presented at impeachment.

Impeachment and Near Impeachment


Only one Supreme Court Justice, Samuel Chase (one of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence), has ever been impeached. The House of Representatives accused Chase of letting his Federalist political leanings affect his rulings, and served him with eight articles of impeachment in late 1804. The Senate acquitted him of all charges in 1805, establishing the right of the judiciary to independent opinion. Chase continued on the Court until his death in June 1811.

In 1957, at the height of McCarthyism, the Georgia General Assembly passed a joint resolution calling for "The Impeachment of Certain U.S. Supreme Court Justices" believed to be enabling Communism with their decisions. The resolution targeted Chief Justice Earl Warren and Associate Justices Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, Tom Campbell Clark, Felix Frankfurter, and Stanley Forman Reed (as well as several unnamed deceased Justices) for "...[usurping] the congressional power to make law in violation of Article I, Sections I and 8, and violated Sections 3 and 5 of the 14th Amendment and nullified the 10th Amendment of the Constitution."

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_a_US_S...#ixzz1zUO2O0vY
Maxx is offline   Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 01:05 PM   #33
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

fuck that


the law raises taxes, Period.

all revenue and tax bills originate in the House, ergo congress can raise or lower taxes, in this case raise.

NOT ONE THING IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL about Rboerts decision ... unless someone can prove the healthcare law doesnt raise taxes ?

ANYONE?
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 01:34 PM   #34
Sexyeccentric1
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 126013
Join Date: Mar 14, 2012
Location: Rocking in my rocking chair on my porch..
Posts: 654
Default You know what is really gonna be funny....?

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
I was wondering how long my righty friends would cry about this!

My guess was until November .... and then beyond after the Mitt has lost and they lament that they should have run Santorum.

Could you crybabies impeach him sometime in the next four years so Obama can appoint another Justice?

If you crybabies understood just what happened , you would realize that Roberts handed you many victories in the future with this ruling.
Watching them cry foul and carry on when Obama gets re-elected for another term. Man can't wait for the repubs to start even more crap and whining when that day comes.
Sexyeccentric1 is offline   Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 02:06 PM   #35
budman33
Valued Poster
 
budman33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 30, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,648
Default

All those lobbyists and they didn't get what they wanted. Shameful.
budman33 is offline   Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 02:10 PM   #36
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by budman33 View Post
All those lobbyists and they didn't get what they wanted. Shameful.
they got exactly what theyve been saying all along ... Obamacare raises taxes

CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 04:59 PM   #37
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

Impeachment won't happen; but he should be suspcious of every waiter/waitress that serves him his food when he goes out...........every banquet meal, every breakfast, every luncheon.......food handlers have strange ways of treating those they dislike.

He is a pariah; make Robert's life miserable for the next 30 years he is on the court...mock him, taunt him, etc.

He isn't welcome in public. Stay home Robert's.

Harriett Meirs is looking like a good nomination to me.
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 05:31 PM   #38
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

pretty unrealistically funny whirlie
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 06:44 PM   #39
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Are you kidding? He's the toast of Washington. He'll be at every high society party. Washington is his town, now. He has no worries. Washington loves him.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 06:48 PM   #40
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

Yeah; but in the back of his liberal mind will be the nagging thought ..."could this waiter be a closet Libertarian ? "

Afterall, they are everywhere.



Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
Are you kidding? He's the toast of Washington. He'll be at every high society party. Washington is his town, now. He has no worries. Washington loves him.
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 06:56 PM   #41
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default

Come on, Guys, a Supreme Court Justice can rule any way they want, and does not have to answer to anybody but Congress, who does have the power of impeachment.

But get real. Just who, (or what), would President Obama replace him with? Good Lord.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 07:00 PM   #42
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Teagulls!
Good catch, I stand corrected!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
But get real. Just who, (or what), would President Obama replace him with? Good Lord.
Oh come now, you're asking for analytical reasoning from these guys? Ain't gonna happen in this lifetime!
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved