Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 389
Harley Diablo 375
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 273
George Spelvin 260
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70672
biomed162316
Yssup Rider60189
gman4453215
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48375
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino41213
CryptKicker37176
Mokoa36491
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35624
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-21-2012, 03:49 PM   #31
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainMidnight View Post
Really?

The policies that have contributed far more than any others over the last forty years to wealth disparity in favor of the very well off involve ultra-accommodative monetary policy by the Fed, including but not limited to the recent iterations of QE. Are you claiming that those were partisan measures pushed primarily by Republicans?

If not, would you care to try to tell us what other policy or policies implemented by either party between 1981 and 2012 resulted in increased income or wealth disparity that comparatively benefited the wealthy?

(I don't think anyone needs to hold his/her breath waiting for an answer.)
Welcome. I was looking for your post on this matter from a few days ago to cite and re-post here. You beat me to it.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 09-21-2012, 03:49 PM   #32
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

http://taxfoundation.org/article/cbo...ome-inequality
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 09-21-2012, 05:12 PM   #33
Texas Contrarian
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2009
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 3,317
Default


That's a pretty good quick take on the issue. The author clearly indicates that any redistribution by way of the tax code has been downward, not upward. That process began in the 1980s and continued in several installments over the years.

What some people seem to forget is that although the effective tax rates across the entire income distribution are much lower in the U.S. than in Europe's social democracies, the level of progressivity is much higher.

It's true that income and wealth disparity has increased substantially since the 1970s, but that's in spite of tax code and rate changes, not because of them.
Texas Contrarian is online now   Quote
Old 09-22-2012, 12:53 PM   #34
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainMidnight View Post
What?!?

Since when is allowing people to keep more of the money they earn "redistribution of wealth?"

People may reasonably differ on what the proper tax rate is for each income bracket, but remember that the tax code of the U.S. is actually much more progressive than that of Europe's social democracies. (Although the rates are far lower across-the-board.)

Do you realize that over the last thirty years, taxes have been cut far more for the non-affluent than for the wealthy?
We have two tax codes in this country.

While what you say may be trure at the Federal Level, regressive taxes have been going up over the last thirty years.

You can not have an honest discussion regarding taxes without talking about all taxes and how they effect us all.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 09-22-2012, 01:56 PM   #35
BigLouie
Valued Poster
 
BigLouie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 5, 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,860
Default

BigLouie is offline   Quote
Old 09-22-2012, 04:38 PM   #36
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

The video I keep seeing has those passages in it so what you pissing yourself about. Those extra words don't change what Obama said one iota.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 09-22-2012, 05:33 PM   #37
Texas Contrarian
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2009
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 3,317
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
We have two tax codes in this country.


While what you say may be trure at the Federal Level, regressive taxes have been going up over the last thirty years.


You can not have an honest discussion regarding taxes without talking about all taxes and how they effect us all.
The extent to which regressive taxes have increased over the last thirty years is miniscule in comparison to the reduction in the federal income tax burden on the bottom three quintiles of the distribution. If you want to have an "honest discussion" of taxation, you must begin by acknowledging that point.

This graph is an eye-opener to those laboring under the delusion that the main cause of our budget woes is the failure to insufficiently tax the "rich."



For the respective countries, the graph reflects federal and state income taxes, payroll taxes, sales taxes, VAT, etc.

See discussion @ http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/20...ig-government/

BigLouie, you should have paused for just a moment and thought about a couple of the statements made by the creator of that graphic you posted. Note particularly the claim that in recent years the trend has been "the reverse", and that redistribution is flowing from the poor to the rich. In order to avoid disingenuity, he needed to note that widening income and wealth disparity in favor of the affluent has nothing to do with the tax code, yet he did no such thing. And apparently he failed to note recent rounds of additional tax cuts for non-affluent households. There were all sorts of supposedly "temporary" tax cuts, refundable tax credits, and child care tax credits, among other things. In addition, there was a supposedly "temporary" two percentage point cut in the payroll tax. But does anyone seriously believe that it's going to be rescinded any time soon, if ever?

Obviously, the fact that something is posted under the heading of "the facts" in a colorful graphic does not necessarily mean that it is...well, a fact! And to top it all off, the clown who created that crap noted at the end that people are entitled to their own opinions, but not their own facts. LMAO!

I hope he managed to remain anonymous. Otherwise, he might want to consider putting a bag over his head like fans of the New Orleans Saints during their cellar-dwelling days of a few decades ago.

"Who dat?"
Texas Contrarian is online now   Quote
Old 09-22-2012, 05:40 PM   #38
Munchmasterman
Valued Poster
 
Munchmasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
The video I keep seeing has those passages in it so what you pissing yourself about. Those extra words don't change what Obama said one iota.
This does. Completely.


"But now NBC News has obtained the rest of Obama’s comments, and it is clear his remarks were taken completely out of context. Obama is not talking about redistributing wealth at all — instead, he speaks about competition, the market place and innovation in an effort to improve government services in Chicago."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/4-pinocchios-for-a-truncated-14-year-old-obama-clip/2012/09/20/9b40f4b8-0330-11e2-91e7-2962c74e7738_blog.html
Munchmasterman is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved