Quote:
Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel
Again it's all about understanding how examples are used or not.
|
actually .. Wakeup intended that for me more than you.
anyway .. not only do i not believe this woman, i think she will not testify under oath. if she did, she's be subject to perjury. she's already guilty of slander and/or libel. both actually.
and why should she testify? she has served her purpose for the Dems. the confirmation vote has been delayed .. briefly .. but if she goes farther then she better have a deal with some Dem to pay her a ton of money so she can defend herself against at least civil if not criminal charges.