Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
649 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
397 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
280 |
George Spelvin |
267 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70799 | biomed1 | 63389 | Yssup Rider | 61083 | gman44 | 53297 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48712 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 42886 | The_Waco_Kid | 37233 | CryptKicker | 37224 | Mokoa | 36496 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
12-29-2012, 09:59 PM
|
#31
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Nope. Sorry. I don't give a rat's ass what you think, because you don't think.
You're a knee jerk asshole. I just exposed you for the low form of life you are. Proud?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-29-2012, 10:06 PM
|
#32
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Proud?
|
Absofuckinglutely! I am proud to be an American!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-29-2012, 10:12 PM
|
#33
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Actually, you are a disgrace to all that America stands for, but I grow tired of you. You should, however, visit a local college. Their abnormal psychology department could write a whole chapter on you. Just think, you could be helping people, for a change.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-29-2012, 10:14 PM
|
#34
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Actually, you are a disgrace to all that America stands for, but I grow tired of you. You should, however, visit a local college. Their abnormal psychology department could write a whole chapter on you. Just think, you could be helping people, for a change.
|
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-30-2012, 12:40 AM
|
#35
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex
If you "fully support Liberty," you must have worn Liberty's uniform.
Did you?
|
These guys never served either. So I guess none of them fully supported liberty.
John Adams
John Quincy Adams
Martin Van Buren
Grover Cleveland
William Taft
Woodrow Wilson
Warren Harding
Calvin Coolidge
Herbert Hoover
Franklin Roosevelt
Bill Clinton
Barack Obama
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-30-2012, 01:12 AM
|
#36
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
And we know Clinton actively avoided the draft. Unlike me. Thanks, Joe.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-30-2012, 01:16 AM
|
#37
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
|
You're welcome.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-30-2012, 03:05 AM
|
#38
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
|
You don't keep up at all. When Bush was going to nominate Harriet Meirs who stopped him? It wasn't the democrats, it was conservatives. When Bush talked about amnesty for illegal aliens who was it that stopped him? It was conservatives. When Bush wanted the debt ceiling raised who complained the loudest? It was conservatives. When Bush would not veto extra spending by the dems in Congress who complained? It was conservatives.
You can say it as much as you want WTF but it doesn't make it true.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-30-2012, 03:20 AM
|
#39
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe bloe
These guys never served either. So I guess none of them fully supported liberty.
John Adams
John Quincy Adams
Martin Van Buren
Grover Cleveland
William Taft
Woodrow Wilson
Warren Harding
Calvin Coolidge
Herbert Hoover
Franklin Roosevelt
Bill Clinton
Barack Obama
|
Joe the Bloehard, I doubt that you will understand this but I will say it anyway. Those mentioned above may not have served in the military (I didn't take the time to double check). Assuming you are correct there is a huge difference between them and StupidOldFart. None of the above regularly question the patriotism of those who have served and/or now serving. StupidOldFart judges the patriotism of a person based entirely upon whether that person aligns himself with SOF's sick and demented views of liberty, justice and the American way of life.
I have no problem with an individual who has not served. But not having served does not give a person the right to openly and blatantly criticize the patriotism of those who have, based entirely upon political beliefs. Quite frankly Joe, StupidOldFart is the only stupid cocksucker in this forum who is a bigger Bloehard than you. Well, with the possible exception of I B Lying&Crying, of course.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-30-2012, 03:21 AM
|
#40
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
And we know Clinton actively avoided the draft. Unlike me. Thanks, Joe.
|
What proof do you have of any actions concerning the draft?
Your word? Give me a break. I don't see you serving under a police state despot or any of the names or titles you have claimed our government is comprised of. Proof is a good thing. Let's start with a provider confirming your scars.
On second thought, don't worry about it.
There is no way in hell you tried to enlist. Childhood illness or not.
It's simple. You don't have it in you.
We know Clinton used the same legal method many people used.
Why are you so bitter. Why only mention Clinton and no other Rhodes scholar. Or no other captain of industry's son?
If possible, after this attempt at "I would have enlisted if only...." I think even less of you.
I know you don't care but I feel I should let my opinion be known.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-30-2012, 03:22 AM
|
#41
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex
Joe the Bloehard, I doubt that you will understand this but I will say it anyway. Those mentioned above may not have served in the military (I didn't take the time to check). Assuming you are correct there is a huge difference between them and StupidOldFart. None of the above regularly question the patriotism of those who have served and/or now serving. StupidOldFart judges the patriotism of a person based entirely upon whether that person aligns himself with SOF's personal sick and demented views of liberty, justice and the American way of life.
I have no problem with an individual who has not served. But not having served does not give a person the right to openly and blatantly criticize the patriotism of those who have, based entirely upon political beliefs. Quite frankly Joe, StupidOldFart is the only stupid cocksucker in this forum who is a bigger Bloehard than you. Well, with the possible exception of I B Lying&Crying, of course.
|
Fucking Aye!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-30-2012, 04:10 AM
|
#42
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
What proof do you have of any actions concerning the draft?
Your word? Give me a break. I don't see you serving under a police state despot or any of the names or titles you have claimed our government is comprised of. Proof is a good thing. Let's start with a provider confirming your scars.
On second thought, don't worry about it.
There is no way in hell you tried to enlist. Childhood illness or not.
It's simple. You don't have it in you.
We know Clinton used the same legal method many people used.
Why are you so bitter. Why only mention Clinton and no other Rhodes scholar. Or no other captain of industry's son?
If possible, after this attempt at "I would have enlisted if only...." I think even less of you.
I know you don't care but I feel I should let my opinion be known.
|
From a personal perspective, I wouldn't give StupidOldFart the sweat off of my cojones if he was dying of thirst in the Mojave Desert!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-30-2012, 10:20 AM
|
#43
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex
Joe the Bloehard, I doubt that you will understand this but I will say it anyway. Those mentioned above may not have served in the military (I didn't take the time to double check). Assuming you are correct there is a huge difference between them and StupidOldFart. None of the above regularly question the patriotism of those who have served and/or now serving. StupidOldFart judges the patriotism of a person based entirely upon whether that person aligns himself with SOF's sick and demented views of liberty, justice and the American way of life.
I have no problem with an individual who has not served. But not having served does not give a person the right to openly and blatantly criticize the patriotism of those who have, based entirely upon political beliefs. Quite frankly Joe, StupidOldFart is the only stupid cocksucker in this forum who is a bigger Bloehard than you. Well, with the possible exception of I B Lying&Crying, of course.
|
It's usually a mistake to speak in absolutes, which is what you did. You took the position that COG can't fully support liberty unless he served in the military. I simply pointed out that if you truly hold that position, then it would apply to twelve of our presidents.
Some of the greatest patriots never served in the military and some the worst scoundrels did serve. Serving or not serving doesn't necessarily prove anything.
If you "fully support Liberty," you must have worn Liberty's uniform.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-30-2012, 10:39 AM
|
#44
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe bloe
It's usually a mistake to speak in absolutes, which is what you did. You took the position that COG can't fully support liberty unless he served in the military. I simply pointed out that if you truly hold that position, then it would apply to twelve of our presidents.
Some of the greatest patriots never served in the military and some the worst scoundrels did serve. Serving or not serving doesn't necessarily prove anything.
If you "fully support Liberty," you must have worn Liberty's uniform.
|
I will reiterate, I have no problem with those who did not serve. Some of my best and most trusted friends did not serve. That does not mean those individuals are not patriots. It just means they did not serve in the military. Nothing more, nothing less.
You may now return to slobberin' on StupidOldFart's knob now!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
12-30-2012, 12:50 PM
|
#45
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex
I will reiterate, I have no problem with those who did not serve. Some of my best and most trusted friends did not serve. That does not mean those individuals are not patriots. It just means they did not serve in the military. Nothing more, nothing less.
You may now return to slobberin' on StupidOldFart's knob now!
|
You made a stupid statement and you know it. Your pathetic attempt to defend your position just makes you look foolish. You remind me of Obama trying to spin the Benghazi terror attack, mumbo jumbo and double talk.
You may now return to licking Obama's ass.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|