Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 279
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70796
biomed163313
Yssup Rider61021
gman4453296
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48675
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42739
CryptKicker37222
The_Waco_Kid37099
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-13-2012, 08:48 PM   #31
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Stevie View Post
Look, the smartest of the three boobs tries a reasonable defense while taking a rip at me but then sees that the more stupid COG does EXACTLY what I predicted he would do to defend the indefensible. Poor IB Dumb is sandwiched in between as COG gets nailed.



Ha Ha Ha -You guys get your balls busted and then find another great-spelling idiot to join with you in showing your asses. J.D., you said I "loose". J.D. I knew in advance that COG would not be smart enough to pick up on your well-intentioned excuses.

J.D., you do see that your definition is the same as mine, don't you? LMAO COG just wasn't smart enough to admit a small mistake but rather, he chose to compound it and drag his other little bully buddies into the fray to try to extricate him from the situation. Ha Ha Ha COG, IB and JD, the Three Musketeers of Dumbass.

You stumble all over yourselves trying to keep COG from looking so dumb but he won't have any of it and SHOWS everyone you were simply sticking up for the dumbest of the The Three Musketeers of Dumbass.

Please keep me laughing, boys! It is fun to see you imitating "smart". I would have gone for anything reasonable like "did ekim go to the cited site" or anything close but, no, COG acted exactly like Jubilation T. Cornpone from Little Abner.

Keep it up. It is so entertaining to watch all three of you flopping around like fish out of water. Whirly, you are a "non-factor" and realize your limitations. I like that about you.

These others actually believe they are relevant. Your political opinions are just as indefensible as this red herring you're using to take the heat off Dummy#1/COG.
Wrong again – just like you were wrong when you insisted COG was confusing 'cite' and 'site'. Once again, your ignorant, presumptive assertion was revealed to be bogus bullshit. Once again, you have scurried about and resorted to your usual, wormy-tactic of squirming and misdirecting. By this deceit, you hope you might cover your own innate buffoonery like a cat in a litter box trying to cover its shit, and you are a loser.

Your pathetic little word-game underscored the fact that you are - and you will remain - an ignorant, pompous-asshole of a loser. Nothing you write, no argument you make, will ever mitigate that simple fact.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 09:42 PM   #32
gulflover
Valued Poster
 
gulflover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 17, 2010
Location: Elberta, AL
Posts: 456
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
The appropriate word is "cite" which is short for "citation". In proper writing when you forward a statement of fact then you "cite" the source in either a footnote or in the addendum. The original source will then be found in the bibliography. Face it Stevie, you are going up against the entire scholastic establishment. You loose.
I see what you did there. Very clever.
gulflover is offline   Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 10:48 PM   #33
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

I see Stevie took the bait. Don't you love similar words that mean different things like "cite" and "site" (sight), "lose" and "loose". This was two easy <<<< Though I thought too hours was a little slow.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 11:00 PM   #34
Little Stevie
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2009
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,011
Encounters: 26
Default

Slow people bore me. Run along, J.D. No one else is here bragging about the ball-busting they took. Did you recruit Gulf Fluffer to add his tripe? LMAO!
Little Stevie is offline   Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 11:06 PM   #35
Little Stevie
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2009
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,011
Encounters: 26
Default I am laughing hysterically at the comic relief.

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You're a stupid, pompous asshole, and this summation of events is a bald face lie.
Now you've gone and left off the "d" from "bald-faced lie". You can't even muster a good retort without stepping on a rake and hitting yourself in the balls. LMAO

Got any more recruits like Gulf Fluffer?
Little Stevie is offline   Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 11:31 PM   #36
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Geez, Stevie. Get a life.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 12:07 AM   #37
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

I see that Stevie doesn't have any answers. I have another fish hook here but I would rather Stevie prove his point some time. It might be a first.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 06:43 AM   #38
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Stevie View Post
Now you've gone and left off the "d" from "bald-faced lie". You can't even muster a good retort without stepping on a rake and hitting yourself in the balls. LMAO

Got any more recruits like Gulf Fluffer?
Yet another deflection. You are still an pompous-asshole liar.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 06:51 AM   #39
timpage
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 7, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,249
Default

Typical Fox News reporting. Makes it sound like the DOJ and Obama were parties to the lawsuit when they weren't. DOJ probably filed an amicus brief. Imagine that they would have the temerity to suggest that churches have to abide by the same laws as the rest of us. Bastards! Next they'll be saying that the TV huckster evangelist billionaires should have to pay taxes on all that money they bilk out of their elderly devotees! The very idea just boils my blood.....

The decision allows churches to discriminate against their employees by firing them for reasons that would violate the law in the private sector. And TTH knows exactly what he is talking about COG, this lady spent less than 20% of her employment time engaged in teaching religion-related topics. She's not a minister, she's a teacher. Read, man, read!!!
timpage is offline   Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 09:39 AM   #40
Sidewinder
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 1,428
Default

Here's the decision.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-553.pdf
Sidewinder is offline   Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 10:04 AM   #41
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

How is the EEOC not part of the Administration? That would be an interesting development.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 12:41 PM   #42
Little Stevie
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2009
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,011
Encounters: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Yet another deflection. You are still an pompous-asshole liar.
Wrong AGAIN, IB Dumb! Practically every post you made in this thread was an attempt at deflecting attention and making excuses about why your buddy made such an error in misusing "cite" and now you misspell "bald-faced lie" and say I'm using deflection. You need help. Your little mini-army of dunces is failing miserably.
Little Stevie is offline   Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 12:48 PM   #43
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Stevie View Post
Wrong AGAIN, IB Dumb! Practically every post you made in this thread was an attempt at deflecting attention and making excuses about why your buddy made such an error in misusing "cite" and now you misspell "bald-faced lie" and say I'm using deflection. You need help. Your little mini-army of dunces is failing miserably.
You lied in your post. You were challenged on your lie. You, in turn, criticize spelling - that's deflecting. You remain a pompous, lying asshole. You are a loser.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 12:50 PM   #44
Little Stevie
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2009
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,011
Encounters: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
How is the EEOC not part of the Administration? That would be an interesting development.
The EDITORIAL you referenced said the "White House" was hit with a "knockout" punch. Hardly is an Amicus/Friend of the Court Brief the same as filing the suit to begin with. Besides, the corruption on the SCOTUS is a beacon that showcases moral bankruptcy. Roberts, Alito, Kennedy and Scalia should wear NASCAR jumpsuits showing the corporate sponsors who have undoubtedly bought and fully paid for them.
Little Stevie is offline   Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 01:01 PM   #45
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Stevie View Post
The EDITORIAL you referenced said the "White House" was hit with a "knockout" punch. Hardly is an Amicus/Friend of the Court Brief the same as filing the suit to begin with. Besides, the corruption on the SCOTUS is a beacon that showcases moral bankruptcy. Roberts, Alito, Kennedy and Scalia should wear NASCAR jumpsuits showing the corporate sponsors who have undoubtedly bought and fully paid for them.
FYI: The corruption of the Administration is a beacon that showcases moral bankruptcy. Obama, his Czars and his department heads should wear NASCAR jumpsuits showing the corporate sponsors who have undoubtedly bought and fully paid for them.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved