Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > Texas > Houston > Coed Discussions - Houston
test
Coed Discussions - Houston Both male and female members can mingle and interact here. Let's keep these discussions on-topic, thought-provoking, and more importantly...entertaining!

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 278
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163220
Yssup Rider60897
gman4453294
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48644
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42553
CryptKicker37215
The_Waco_Kid36977
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-13-2013, 08:00 PM   #31
Wakeup
Valerie's Mod Husband
 
Wakeup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 13, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 28,030
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blowpop View Post
Wakeup, in his frenzy to disagree with everything I was doing, seemed positive that I had broken some sort of Eccie rule.
You didn't read your own thread very well...
Wakeup is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 08:10 PM   #32
enderwiggin
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Posts: 3,711
Encounters: 69
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptorcg View Post
Perhaps asking it from another direction and see if you feel the same way: If providers could review Hobbyist and openly post them with a section only providers could see, would you like to have a chance to see it first, Good or Bad, if the provider offered too?
This is maddeningly close to kicking water uphill, but fuck it... here goes.

Let me start by saying I don't care if a lady "reviews" me. They may say what they wish about me, though I doubt they say anything at all. I have no delusions of grandeur with regard to my reputation, sexual prowess or charisma. Likely, I'm about as forgettable a client as they have ever had. So to answer your question: No, I wouldn't care if I had "a chance to see it". If she offered to let me read it, I probably would for no other reason than it would amuse me and I enjoy reading. You see, I don't stand to make any profit from reviews of me.

That's a key point and it bears repeating. Reviews for a provider are free advertisement for their services. If you don't see why protecting the integrity (such as it is... let's be honest, we all know many of the reviews here are virtually worthless) of the content of a review is valuable, then there's no point to continuing this discussion. There's no point to a site like this at all. It may as well be another eros or backpage. What reason could a hobbyist possibly have for sharing that content? Maybe its like blowpop will likely insist and the ladies just looooove reading and reliving their wonderful sessions together. Or he's such a stellar writer that any review of his is destined to be classic literature.

Or maybe its done to curry favor with a provider, plain and simple. Its an odd demonstration of loyalty to her in the hopes of... something. Perhaps a deeper connection and more special relationship, maybe discounts on services or insight into the areas of the board that hobbyists aren't allowed. I don't know for certain and it ultimately doesn't matter. All that matters now is that the integrity of any information he brings to the board is in doubt IMHO. He can point to the forum guidelines and quibble about the minutia, but we will never know why he's writing the reviews/intel he does and whether or not any of it's true.
enderwiggin is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 08:31 PM   #33
Cockzilla
Valued Poster
 
Cockzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 30, 2013
Location: Oz
Posts: 117
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enderwiggin View Post
This is maddeningly close to kicking water uphill, but fuck it... here goes.

Let me start by saying I could care less if a lady "reviewed" me. They may say what they wish about me, though I doubt they say anything at all: I have no delusions of grandeur with regard to my reputation, sexual prowess or charisma. Likely, I'm about as forgettable a client as they have ever had. So to answer your question: No, I wouldn't care if I had "a chance to see it". If she offered to let me read it, I probably would for no other reason than it would amuse me and I enjoy reading. You see, I don't stand to make any profit from reviews of me.

That's a key point and it bears repeating. Reviews for a provider are free advertisement for their services. If you don't see why protecting the integrity (such as it is... let's be honest, we all know many of the reviews here are virtually worthless) of the content of a review is valuable, then there's no point to continuing this discussion. There's no point to a site like this at all. It may as well be another eros or backpage. What reason could a hobbyist possibly have for sharing that content? Maybe its like blowpop will likely insist and the ladies just looooove reading and reliving their wonderful sessions together. Or he's such a stellar writer that any review of his is destined to be classic literature.

Or maybe its done to curry favor with a provider, plain and simple. Its an odd demonstration of loyalty to her in the hopes of... something. Perhaps a deeper connection and more special relationship, maybe discounts on services or insight into the areas of the board that hobbyists aren't allowed. I don't know for certain and it ultimately doesn't matter. All that matters now is that the integrity of any information a hobbyist who shares ROS brings to the board is in doubt IMHO. They can point to the forum guidelines and quibble about the minutia, but we will never know why they're writing the reviews/intel they're writing.
I would go along with it looks like what you said above, and nobody would know if they could keep their fingers off the key board. But the need to be witty over road common sense .
Cockzilla is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 08:32 PM   #34
Raptorcg
Gaining Momentum
 
Raptorcg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 27, 2013
Location: Sofa North of Houston
Posts: 87
Encounters: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enderwiggin View Post
That's a key point and it bears repeating. Reviews for a provider are free advertisement for their services. If you don't see why protecting the integrity (such as it is... let's be honest, we all know many of the reviews here are virtually worthless) of the content of a review is valuable, then there's no point to continuing this discussion. ... All that matters now is that the integrity of any information a hobbyist who shares ROS brings to the board is in doubt IMHO.
I totally agree these are valid points, if a writer changes a planned posting because a provider urged him too after seeing it but before posting it, and they do, reviews lose their value for all. And it just becomes one large ThreAD.

I always hope personal integrity comes into play, which is probably overly optimistic when it comes too human nature.
Raptorcg is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 08:38 PM   #35
enderwiggin
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Posts: 3,711
Encounters: 69
Default

Despite what he probably thinks, I'm trying to help here. blowpop has been around for a long time and might have great experience or insight to offer to younger and/or new members, but you can't save people from themselves. Unfortunately, a ruling has been made and in my own personal opinion its the wrong one.

This board may be broken now. Only time and the future conduct of the members will tell. I genuinely hope I'm wrong.
enderwiggin is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 08:44 PM   #36
BatteriesNotIncluded
Valued Poster
 
BatteriesNotIncluded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 18, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 867
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blowpop View Post
Raptor, I always assumed the logic behind ROS secrecy was to encourage guys who were worried about provider retaliation to be honest in their reviews. We all know that leaks happen, and with the rule in place mods can deal with WKs who share information that reviewers want to have kept private.

I was surprised (OK, not all that surprised, considering his history) when tried to spin my sharing my review of the session with a provider with her into some sort of rules violation. It never occurred to me that it would be considered so on Eccie, and thus my request for clarification.
BP... Good to see you still posting after all these years. Good character shines through regardless of inane arguments. This board is truly broken, at least the Houston sections. Keep in touch.

BNI
BatteriesNotIncluded is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 08:58 PM   #37
Wakeup
Valerie's Mod Husband
 
Wakeup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 13, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 28,030
Encounters: 4
Default

Wait...people ACTUALLY think that the concept of ROS is meant to protect honesty from retaliation in reviews????

This place is MUCH farther down the hopeless road than I previously thought...
Wakeup is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 09:19 PM   #38
oilfieldscum
Valued Poster
 
oilfieldscum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 22, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,735
Encounters: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jusanotherdude View Post
The way that I understand it is, that comments made by you are yours to share as the only infringement on private content is your own..... that being said, as soon as the info is posted it is considered PA info and if the provider then posts what she's been told then she is in violation of the guidelines and is subject to the resulting punishment. But you as the posters of the original content are not in violation...... so basically..... you telling TheCFE about the ROS is fine.... her posting about it is not......

Clear as mud?
So a fucktard can reveal anything he wants to a hooktard prior to posting it in a private area? If she posts about it then she gets the blame?

How do you mods determine which came first the chicken or the egg?

Me thincks this might make modtarding more difficult.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pistolero View Post
Since it was obvious that JAD and I did see it a little different, I went and got the correct view. And JAD is correct. I am wrong. You can give her your comments, but if she comments on it, then she is in violation.

Nothing to see here folks, move along.
From meditation, Heaven, or ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wakeuр View Post
You didn't read your own thread very well...
No he didn't but you can have the credit.
oilfieldscum is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 09:42 PM   #39
tracer
Valued Poster
 
tracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 6, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 529
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jusanotherdude View Post
The way that I understand it is, that comments made by you are yours to share as the only infringement on private content is your own..... that being said, as soon as the info is posted it is considered PA info and if the provider then posts what she's been told then she is in violation of the guidelines and is subject to the resulting punishment. But you as the posters of the original content are not in violation...... so basically..... you telling TheCFE about the ROS is fine.... her posting about it is not......

Clear as mud?
Clear as day.

Making a mental note that on at least one occasion I agreed with JaD. I respect Ender's opinion, but have to disagree with his take on this one.
tracer is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 09:57 PM   #40
Seedy
Valued Poster
 
Seedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 23, 2010
Location: houston texas
Posts: 10,174
Encounters: 38
Cool

I agree with ender for what it is worth, no sense in having ros, or private comments if this is allowed. Of course wk's will keep on doing their thing. Without a strict ruling, there is way too much wiggle room on this. It is bullshit.
Seedy is offline   Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 03:40 AM   #41
Sarunga
Valued Poster
 
Sarunga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 27, 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,146
Encounters: 28
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wakeuр View Post
You didn't read your own thread very well...
He probably did....but you probably didn't read his mind very well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by enderwiggin View Post
Despite what he probably thinks, I'm trying to help here. blowpop has been around for a long time and might have great experience or insight to offer to younger and/or new members, but you can't save people from themselves. Unfortunately, a ruling has been made and in my own personal opinion its the wrong one.
That's pretty clear....even without you trying to convince us.
Sarunga is offline   Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 03:44 AM   #42
yardbird74
Valued Poster
 
yardbird74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 6, 2013
Location: The Boar's Head Pub
Posts: 280
Encounters: 14
Default



yardbird74 is offline   Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 04:33 AM   #43
Wayward
Ambassador of the Dead
 
Wayward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 28, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,279
Encounters: 3
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jusanotherdude View Post
The way that I understand it is, that comments made by you are yours to share as the only infringement on private content is your own..... that being said, as soon as the info is posted it is considered PA info and if the provider then posts what she's been told then she is in violation of the guidelines and is subject to the resulting punishment. But you as the posters of the original content are not in violation...... so basically..... you telling TheCFE about the ROS is fine.... her posting about it is not......

Clear as mud?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pistolero View Post
Here is my take on that.

If you post it, there are comments on the review and she wants to know what you said and you tell her, not OK. Once you post it , the PA rules apply..
But what if lets just say I had my own SHMB and I posted a review, let chicagoboy fix the puncuation and spelling, then reread my frapping good prose and made a few improvements. Then I posted the new improved version here on the ick. Could I read the orgional review to the lovely hooktard so I could get a free blowpop or is this the kind of post that has the mods thinking why won't that fucking Wayward just die already?

Yes I misspelled punctuation because it was funny.
Wayward is offline   Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 06:42 AM   #44
chicagoboy
Ribbed, For Her Pleasure
 
chicagoboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: Not Chicago
Posts: 16,442
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayward View Post
Yes I misspelled punctuation because it was funny.
Puncktuation would have been funnier.
chicagoboy is offline   Quote
Old 05-14-2013, 07:53 AM   #45
jbravo_123
Verified Member
 
jbravo_123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 7, 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,548
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jusanotherdude View Post
Ok..... here us my non-mod response in regards to this: Why?

What Earthly good can honestly come from sharing what will be ROS /PA content with the lady FOR the lady?

Let's be honest, the chances any type of "constructive criticism " that many may argue would be reasons, would almost CERTAINLY be overly flowery and glossed over. Chances are the reviews would only be a way of making the hobbyist look better to said provider to curry favor for future visits. Which is fine for the hobbyist to be sure. But again, what are the gains for the provider? Hoe many of these "shared" reviews do think ACTUALLY contained useful to the provider info like "TCB skills need work", "breath was less than fresh/bad", "incall smelled like shit or was nasty/dirty", or something of the like? I would venture to guess pretty Damn close (if not absolutely ) zero!

Meanwhile she stands to gain points and or a ban for posting she is in the know. She gets to wear that veil of being one who t again and reacts to her reviews which may persuade others yo not review her on future visits.

Whether you and she feel she has the right to know or not, that is not how this board is setup.
People just like to have as much information about what's being said about them as possible? While some may not care, I would assume most would choose to know ROS as opposed to not know if given the option. Just like if given the option, I'm sure most dudes wouldn't turn down access to the provider-only areas of the board.

Quote:
Originally Posted by enderwiggin View Post
Despite what he probably thinks, I'm trying to help here. blowpop has been around for a long time and might have great experience or insight to offer to younger and/or new members, but you can't save people from themselves. Unfortunately, a ruling has been made and in my own personal opinion its the wrong one.

This board may be broken now. Only time and the future conduct of the members will tell. I genuinely hope I'm wrong.
I just assume providers are able to get access to ROS/ML parts of the board. However, this doesn't invalidate the review process to me. Amount of reviews and general quality of them still matter as well as the occasional "no" reviews you see. Of course, reviews should be read with the idea in mind that details are likely embellished, but that would happen regardless of ROS information truly being concealed or not.
jbravo_123 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved