The new economy and the $80 escort (or "business is not slow")

[TonyStark]

I like steak!

[Sleepy363]

Originally Posted by hotlips_houlihan

Dude are you for real? We are talking about MEN SHOPPING FOR PUSSY. Get off your high horse-that's a bit different than buying shoes.

He was responding to your post here:

Originally Posted by hotlips_houlihan

You are a man. Men try to get as much as they can for as little as possible. You are taught that from a very young age.

In this first post, you were not referring to men shopping for pussy. You were just making a generalization about men being cheap, unless you were trying to say that our parents and society teach us at an early age to try to get pussy as cheap as possible.

So he responded based on your generalization, and then you change back to the original topic on him. Make up your mind!

[Sleepy363]

As far as the economy of pussy goes... I have seen more women raising their rates in the last few months, so that tells me that their business is doing quite well and they are adjusting their prices accordingly.

I'm sure some ladies are slow, but there is usually a reason for that.

[Sleepy363]

btw... if a bunch of ladies lower their rates to $100 or so, and they start getting 4-5 more guys per day, that's a lot less availability. Soon, you'll be bitching and throwing a fit because you can't get in to see a provider.

Either way, people are going to complain. Some guys will bitch that women are priced too high. Some women will bitch that guys are cheap bastards. This is never going to change.

[Tiffani Jameson]

Don't feed the trolls, ladies...

[disilene]

They should have a mandatory name for these threads: "Circle the wagons"

Guys, once you find that awesome deal, why do y'all brag so that other guys come in and take advantage? You need to sit on that pot of of gold, don't tell anyone. You aren't going to the higher priced providers so the argument of trying to get them to drop their prices is moot.....all you are doing is opening up the door for problems. How do you know some ladies aren't going to do just what you suggest....go find the tight young cheap bodies, "take them under their wing" and get them to raise rates?

Once you find that awesome deal, best to keep mum. That girl will get more business and raise her rates on you.

[Thibodeaux]

I have gotten 6 PMs after asking not to be PM'd. Of those people, one guy had ONE post and he expected some help. Another guy has 674 posts and NOT one review.

No wonder some guys can't find reasonable pussy - they either don't read, or don't contribute.

I found ExNYer's post most interesting. Sir, you sound like you are upset that you must pay high Eccie prices for sex..and sex from the same old girls that have been escorting for a dozen years. I do not "hide" the girls from you. Most providers will tell you that a guy reads a review and goes to see a girl and demands the same services. We know how reviews go - they are exaggerated one way or another. Guys say they did so much in a strip club or barebacked a girl and now every clown expects a bbfs session. OR guys pay a lower rate and the girl says "please review me at my advertised rate". Oh the latter happens VERY often, I say as many guys out there lower their heads yes.

Am I special, exNYer? Nope. I brush, floss, bathe, shave, and am easygoing. Ladies - can you say the same for all of your clients? No you can't.

But let me make a distinction between "providers" and ladies I pay for sex. Providers have 1000 posts on Eccie. Even 5000 posts. Of the girls I pay for sex:
- a few are on eccie
- a few were on eccie
- some are strippers who only fuck a select few
- some are strippers who do fuck in the club
- some answer my ads on various social sites
- some have placed ads on various social sites
- some are referrals from my friends
- one is a popular Eccie provider and I don't pay her a dime because she's a nympho

Maybe I am special. I'm a sure thing. I am not a time waster. If a lady texts me and asks me if I want to see her, I tell her yes or no with no games. Ladies, do you like time-wasters? No you don't. I am not a haggler. When my ladies text me I tell them I have 60, 80, 100, or 120. They can can take it or leave it, but they are the ones who called me..and when they're ready to take my offer I get a text back.

Also, I'm a good fuck and have a big dick. The ladies that will reply that it does not matter and they do not enjoy the sex and that I'm being lied to - THAT is a provider who does not enjoy her job, is burnt out, and can't provide GFE. Believe it or not, girls you pay for sex CAN enjoy it.

Now then, a few people have posted, but MANY more are reading this and thinking "damn, Thib is right". To those guys I say, be clean, be polite, make an offer, and let it soak (like the crab pots do on Deadliest Catch). Listen to me, the guys that jump up and down and argue, and the providers, and decide for yourself who makes the most sense.

As you can see, Eccie is one of the many venues I use to get sex for cash. I dont come right out and ask "how much money will it take for you to fuck me?" That's the escort review board way. What I do is go to various clubs, make my face known, and give a girl my number and tell her I can help her with rent when times are tough. No I wont pay your $200 rate, but call me when you're at $100. Send enough of those out and you get a couple of hits in a month. And once they do it once, they'll do it again. Just gotta get your foot in the door.

Of the few Eccie girls I see, I get their phone numbers and see them when they leave their pimp. Of these girls, the pimp takes half of their money, about $80. So when I give them $100, they're happy. The girls that you see who work with other girls...and then all of a sudden you DON'T see them working with that group....yeh, those pimped girls.

ExNYer, I am not hoping that the Eccie providers will "fall for my scam". I'm not interested in 35yo and up providers. Who has posted on this thread? Sami, about 34. Hotlips, almost 40. lisalisa, 31. Ze - 27maybe? I want ripe 19yos. My audience is not the ladies, but the gentleman.

Some people have asked me if these were quick blow and go sessions. No, they were not. I had one today which lasted an hour. An outcall even. Full GFE, DATY, BBBJ, hell she even suggested we go bareback since she's on birth control but I declined. Okay, I did do a stripper slide on her with a short dip of the head inside before suiting up, but we use covers. 19yo, 36C, fresh, low volume - not a provider - just sex for money. Found her through some networking...young girl needing financial assistance.

It's tough out there. Girls need money and working at Walmart isn't paying the bills. Know a stripper? She's got friends who don't strip but need a little boost now and then. I did one of those Friday. One benjamin, was a friend of a stripper I know. This was a 45 minute GFE deal.

Perhaps I should change my title from "$80 escorts" to "$80 Fucks". If you want to fuck hookers, then this is the place. If you want to fuck hot girls for a more reasonable price, they are out there.

To address a statement by hotlips houlihan, not all girls who have sex for money will be doing it for 20 years. Just because you do it, doesn't mean that the average girl who sells her pussy for a few months or a year will do it for the rest of her life. Many of my girls disappear after a few months

Can I post ass and titty pix here? I would love to post some pix of the hot girls that take 80 bucks. You might even recognize some of them from Eccie.

Finally, I love the way members argue here. It's not just arguing, it's aggressive bickering. You know and hate each other way too much. I'm glad I'm new here.

[Randall Creed]

Lol.

Good shit.

[hotlips_houlihan]

Originally Posted by still-asleep

He was responding to your post here:



In this first post, you were not referring to men shopping for pussy. You were just making a generalization about men being cheap, unless you were trying to say that our parents and society teach us at an early age to try to get pussy as cheap as possible.

So he responded based on your generalization, and then you change back to the original topic on him. Make up your mind!

Ummmm my original post was in reference to what the OP said about GETTING PUSSY FOR CHEAPER and his question as to whether or not that made him a cheapskate. I was not making a generalized statement about men being cheap. I was responding to what the OP said. So I don't need to make up my mind about shit. How's that for tone?

I mean c'mon, let's keep it real here. There are some men out there who will try to get as much as they can in this hobby for as little money as possible, and there are some ladies in this hobby who will do as little as possible for as much money as they can get. Some women call him cheap while men say he's a smart businessman. Some men would be quick to call her greedy, while some ladies would say she is a good business woman. I mean who can really blame them, right? There is also everything in between. That's what makes the world go 'round-not just the hobby.

Venus/Mars. Sheesh already.

[sirliamscross]

What he says relates only to himself, so I'm not really sure what the point is. To brag that he pays less than the rest of us for sex? To tell the older providers that they don't appeal to him? To tell us what we already know - young girls can be paid to fuck? And sometimes at a low rate? That people who post a bunch and never review piss you off?

OK - I guess most of us already knew this. So, what's your point, Thidodeaux?

You don't share any names, you won't accept PM's and you act like you don't like the environment here.

So, again - what is your point? is this thread just to let us all know what a badass you are? To let all the ladies know what a good fuck you are and how big your dick is? Or to help all the men understand that we are overpaying because - with your big dick and super fuck ability - you can score young chicks who will beg to bareback you for cheap?

How does anything you've said help anybody at all?

[Sleepy363]

Originally Posted by hotlips_houlihan

Ummmm my original post was in reference to what the OP said about GETTING PUSSY FOR CHEAPER and his question as to whether or not that made him a cheapskate. I was not making a generalized statement about men being cheap. I was responding to what the OP said. So I don't need to make up my mind about shit. How's that for tone?

I showed your quote where you generalized about guys learning that as we grew up. That statement had nothing to do with getting pussy for cheaper. It was just saying guys learn at an early age to try to get what they can for as little as they can. when lazarus responded to that, you changed it back to being about the specific topic from before, when your earlier statement there was clearly NOT.... unless you are trying to say that guys learn from their parents to get pussy as cheap as they can. I don't really care about what "tone" you choose to express. The sentence I quoted from you was clear enough for me.

[Sami]

And then there was Thibodeaux with 42 post 1 review..

Another Troll

[hotlips_houlihan]

Originally Posted by still-asleep

I showed your quote where you generalized about guys learning that as we grew up. That statement had nothing to do with getting pussy for cheaper. It was just saying guys learn at an early age to try to get what they can for as little as they can. when lazarus responded to that, you changed it back to being about the specific topic from before, when your earlier statement there was clearly NOT.... unless you are trying to say that guys learn from their parents to get pussy as cheap as they can. I don't really care about what "tone" you choose to express. The sentence I quoted from you was clear enough for me.

Actually, my whole response was in reference to the original post-which was about cheap pussy, was it not? Not sure about you southerners, but up yonder in my days of growing up-you know, back in the dinosaur era-dads taught their sons to get what they can for as little effort and/or money as possible when it came to gettin in a girl's pants. I mean, as a young guy, didn't you go after the easy lay/school slut versus the one you had to wine and dine when you wanted to get off? But ok, you are right, I am wrong. You win. Now go back to sleep.

p.s. Sorry, the "tone" comment was not meant for "you" it was in reference to whatshisface.

[Guest062912]

Lol. I find it cute how he says he's banging "hot young girls" and yet his only review is of a 39-year-old who seems to be very YMMV, based on the comments of the review. She certainly isn't what I would describe as a "hot 19yo".

In HIS words he describes her as "little pooch on the belly," and "I must say that with the flat chest, not-very feminine face, and her interest in TUMA and FUMA, and the price, I was worried that I was with a TS at first because her panties were still on. So I started playing with her pussy and that checked out, but maybe she had a great gender-bender doctor. So I started caressing her neck but was actually feeling for an adams apple. No bump, so off I went. "

Yes, very "hot little 19yo". Never met the girl, probably a very lovely person. Just making a point about the validity of the OP's claims.

[Sleepy363]

Originally Posted by hotlips_houlihan

Actually, my whole response was in reference to the original post-which was about cheap pussy, was it not? Not sure about you southerners, but up yonder in my days of growing up-you know, back in the dinosaur era-dads taught their sons to get what they can for as little effort and/or money as possible when it came to gettin in a girl's pants. I mean, as a young guy, didn't you go after the easy lay/school slut versus the one you had to wine and dine when you wanted to get off? But ok, you are right, I am wrong. You win. Now go back to sleep.

I'm not a southerner originally. But no, my dad never tried to teach me about how to get into a girl's pants for little effort or money.. lol Do parents really teach their kids that?

What I did as a horny teenager/college student had nothing to do with my parents' teachings. In fact, most of the time, my actions were usually in spite of those teachings to the opposite.