Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
646 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
389 |
Harley Diablo |
375 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
273 |
George Spelvin |
263 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70688 | biomed1 | 62390 | Yssup Rider | 60224 | gman44 | 53217 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48395 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 41270 | CryptKicker | 37179 | Mokoa | 36491 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | The_Waco_Kid | 35684 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
01-24-2014, 11:10 PM
|
#31
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
That's LittleEva for us. "I are a independent."
![Mfr Lol](https://cdn-w.eccie.net/images/smilies/modern/mfr_lol.gif)
|
Sorry Curly you are a idiot. I am a independent. Not are a independent.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-24-2014, 11:18 PM
|
#32
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
You're an independent who always sides with Obama and the Democrats.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-24-2014, 11:24 PM
|
#33
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
Sorry Curly you are a idiot. I am a independent. Not are a independent.
|
Rong, you are a Oindependent... can't deny it now... but, you got that light bulb thing, right.... but it's to late. they are gone.... fuck
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-25-2014, 07:21 AM
|
#34
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
You're an independent who always sides with Obama and the Democrats.
![Roflmao](https://cdn-w.eccie.net/images/smilies/modern/roflmao.gif)
|
No I am a independent who ridicules the stupid shit you all post here. ![Sleep 1](https://cdn-w.eccie.net/images/smilies/modern/sleep_1.gif) Wake up old timer.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-25-2014, 10:46 AM
|
#35
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
CNN is catching on to how bad the deal is......
CNN interviews Iranian Hassan Rouhani:
HASSAN ROUHANI: So in the context of nuclear technology, particularly of research and development and peaceful nuclear technology, we will not accept any limitations. And in accordance with the parliament law, in the future, we’re going to need 20,000 mega watts of nuclear produced electricity and we’re determined to obtain the nuclear fuel for the nuclear installation at the hands of our Iranian scientists and we’re going to follow in this path.
CNN FAREED ZAKARIA: So there would be no destruction of centrifuges?
ROUHANI: Not under any circumstances. Not under any circumstances.
CNN CHRIS CUOMO: I mean, Fareed, what is the deal? That’s supposed to be the whole underpinning of moving forward from the United States perspective is that they scale back and dismantle all this stuff we’ve been hearing. How do you interpret what you just heard from the president?
CNN ZAKARIA: Well, I was as struck by it as you were, Chris. This strikes me as a train wreck. This strikes me as potentially a huge obstacle because the Iranian conception of what the deal is going to look like and the American conception now look like they are miles apart. The Iranian conception seems to be they produce as much nuclear energy as they want, but it is a civilian program and you can have as much monitoring and inspections as you want. The American position is that they have to very substantially scale back the enrichment of uranium and the production of centrifuges.
Now for the first time you have the president of Iran unequivocally saying there will be no destruction of centrifuges. He also made clear in the interview with me that the two heavy water reactors would continue in operation. So this seems like — you know, this is stillborn — I’m not even quite sure what they’re going to talk about if these are the opening positions. And it’s very hard to walk back from as absolutist a position as the president of Iran laid out.
Fascinating interview: watch it here.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive...-on-part-2.php
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-25-2014, 03:31 PM
|
#36
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,249
|
Whirlytard and the Admiral rely on Iranians for their arguments. Odd. I posted this earlier....does it surprise you that the Iranians are claiming they "won" the negotiations that led to the deal? Every country that negotiates any sort of deal, other than an unconditional surrender, claims victory in the deal. It's what all politicians do. Relying on statements like that as the crux of your argument is laughable. Especially when you're talking about the Iranians.
Not one of you dumb motherfuckers has responded to the arguments and points made in the article I posted. Instead, you post up links to quotes from Iranian political and religious leaders as support for your assertion that we "lost". Absurd. Shall we dig up some other statements by the sources you rely on to see if you'll vouch for the truthfulness and integrity of those? Do you want to go there? Fucking halfwits.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-25-2014, 03:39 PM
|
#37
|
Oral Aficionado
Join Date: Feb 13, 2013
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 8,522
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by timpage
Shall we dig up some other statements by the sources you rely on to see if you'll vouch for the truthfulness and integrity of those? Do you want to go there? Fucking halfwits.
|
So, Timmy, you claim the Iranians are lying to make it look like they won when they didn't. And then you claim that the US statements are what we are supposed to go by. You mean the SAME US government statements that said "If you like your insurance, you can keep it', rated at the LIE OF THE YEAR? That government?
Yeah, that government couldn't possibly EVER say something not true in order to look good, huh? Yep.. you called it.. fucking halfwit is spot on. Just not the ones you seem to think.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 2 users liked this post
|
01-25-2014, 04:09 PM
|
#38
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by timpage
Whirlytard and the Admiral rely on Iranians for their arguments.
Fucking halfwits.
|
Generally speaking "halfwits" like you think the others are halfwits, and the rest of the halfwits like you don't have a clue about reality so they don't have an opinion of the mental capacity of the rest of the population ...
.. in a "negotiation" it is generally accepted to have a working knowledge of what the "other side" perceives to be the potential agreement between the parties ... in order to draft the final agreement for the parties' signatures. When the two sides have a differing understanding of the terms and scope of the proposed agreement when they sit down to review the draft they more than likely will not sign the agreement ...
... IF THEY INTEND TO ABIDE BY THE AGREEMENT AFTER IT IS SIGNED.
You really need to sit this one out on the bench. You are out of your league.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 3 users liked this post
|
01-25-2014, 09:39 PM
|
#39
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,249
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedLeg505
So, Timmy, you claim the Iranians are lying to make it look like they won when they didn't. And then you claim that the US statements are what we are supposed to go by. You mean the SAME US government statements that said "If you like your insurance, you can keep it', rated at the LIE OF THE YEAR? That government?
Yeah, that government couldn't possibly EVER say something not true in order to look good, huh? Yep.. you called it.. fucking halfwit is spot on. Just not the ones you seem to think.
|
Is there any topic that you dumbasses can't drag the ACA into? Brainwashed knuckleheads.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-25-2014, 11:55 PM
|
#40
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Timmy's right. Obama has lied about many, many things. Not just Obamacare. Let's mix it up a little.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-29-2014, 10:21 AM
|
#41
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,435
|
Obama in SOTU: If John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan could negotiate with the Soviet Union, then surely a strong and confident America can negotiate with less powerful adversaries (like Iran) today.
Lloyd Bentsen's ghost to Obama: I served with Jack Kennedy. I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. And you're no Jack Kennedy.
If Obama thinks his negotiating abilities are even close to being on a par with Reagan or JFK, he is completely delusional.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-29-2014, 10:30 AM
|
#42
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway
CNN interviews Iranian Hassan Rouhani:
HASSAN ROUHANI: So in the context of nuclear technology, particularly of research and development and peaceful nuclear technology, we will not accept any limitations. And in accordance with the parliament law, in the future, we’re going to need 20,000 mega watts of nuclear produced electricity and we’re determined to obtain the nuclear fuel for the nuclear installation at the hands of our Iranian scientists and we’re going to follow in this path.
CNN FAREED ZAKARIA: So there would be no destruction of centrifuges?
ROUHANI: Not under any circumstances. Not under any circumstances.
|
Yesterday a group of nuclear scientists and Iran experts testified before Congress. One of them noted that in order for Iran to supply its own fuel for 20,000 MW of nuclear generating capacity, it would need a million centrifuges. It currently has over 19,000.
All of the experts agreed Iran already has enough enriched uranium (near weapons grade) to produce 4 nuclear bombs and it would take no more than 4-8 months to assemble them.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-29-2014, 10:42 AM
|
#43
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
And Iran's most secretive production/research site will be off limits to inspectors....
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-29-2014, 10:45 AM
|
#44
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Most people who would make a statement like that would provide a link.
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
01-30-2014, 11:35 AM
|
#45
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
|
Tehran has capacity to break out to bomb if it wishes, intelligence chief James Clapper tells Senate
Iran now has all the technical infrastructure to produce nuclear weapons should it make the political decision to do so......
Looks like the Obama deal was not a deal to box in Iran; but a deal to deny Israel options and time.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-no...medium=twitter
|
|
Quote
![Like](/images/like.png) | 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|