Considering everything-HERE is what i know..interesting?

[guest071811-3]

Lilly..i didn't get deep into that like i should have..but thats also an excellent point..

Its almost scary the ease with which providers can get verified which if they are following the known method to do so fine.. but then as was said..to almost seemingly get to "stay one for life".. is disturbing and brings down the "verified" process..

It puts an uneasy feeling in your gut when not only can almost anyone get verified off of known and unknown hobbyiest vouches..they then no matter what..what happens to them, with them etc..get to stay verified and have access to private areas..get to be passed off as "safe" etc.

I'm sorry.. when a name change occurs.. the person doing so should have to be reviewed 2 times and have 2 different hobbyiest other than those that reviews vouch for her.. thats 4 people doing so.. but that would atleast help in making sure she is "safe" still. If the argument is made that she wouldn't be privy to the girls info areas.. if she truly is safe..has friends that feel she is.. they will help keep her safe..

[mike2]

Oh Oh Alexis .... opps sorry off topic

[urhuckleberry]

Originally Posted by Blond_Lily

... You want to post drug related accusations and private info on the board? Sure go ahead, u can still stay. Threaten another provider's children in a pm? Well that's fine too.

The only difference between this site and others seems to be that you just ask a male to vouch that he has seen your lady parts without being arrested and poof, here's your lifetime membership.

Lily,

If the mods receive reports of the issues you have outlined, action will be taken. All we ask is that the RTM triangle be used to report a post so we can (1) find it, and (2) act on it. If you receive a threatening PM, it should be forwarded to randomuser or urhuckleberry immediately. If that has been done, and you felt there was no action taken, send it to me again.

Finally, there is no lifetime membership on the board. Those who continue to violate forum guidelines may learn that the hard way.

Huck

[Lily Blair]

Another provider's child was threatened, pm was sent to you, the lady who threatened her is still a member, Last Activity: 10-05-2010 07:38 PM.

I'll ask the provider to send it to you again.

[urhuckleberry]

Originally Posted by Blond_Lily

Another provider's child was threatened, pm was sent to you, the lady who threatened her is still a member, Last Activity: 10-05-2010 07:38 PM.

I'll ask the provider to send it to you again.

Thank you.

Huck

[Guest032112]

Originally Posted by urhuckleberry

BB,
You must have read the OP's opening post differently than I did:


There are ways to have civil discussion without the drama and name-calling. Some people just seem incapable of doing so. I am not surprised that some members were offended.

Huck

My bad, Huck. It has been so long ago since reading the start of the thread, I forgot (probably caused by blood flow diversion from the big head). Nonetheless, you're correct, the discussion should be able to occur without the drama or offending others.

[guest071811-3]

Originally Posted by urhuckleberry

Those who continue to violate forum guidelines may learn that the hard way.

Huck

Wonder if that goes for going off topic in a post too? or post not related to the topic at hand

[warbird]

Originally Posted by DeAnna Luv

I signed into eccie to find what yet again?.. yep more BP riff raff being drug on on over.. more BP drama making its way and dragging down a quality site, and more importantly what could be a quality forum.

You certainly have an interesting way of avoiding drama.

[urhuckleberry]

Originally Posted by DeAnna Luv

Wonder if that goes for going off topic in a post too? or post not related to the topic at hand

Deanna, after your first two posts on the thread, I'm not sure if anyone could identify the "topic at hand"... that was certainly my problem.

Huck

[Ginger Doll]

Originally Posted by warbird

You certainly have an interesting way of avoiding drama.

Good observation. And to think I thought it was just me that had noticed.

[Ginger Doll]

Originally Posted by urhuckleberry

Deanna, after your first two posts on the thread, I'm not sure if anyone could identify the "topic at hand"... that was certainly my problem.

Huck

True dat, Huck. Lol.

[dsatterman]

I agree, all these posts have somehow ventured way off topic. I was lost as soon as I saw riff/raff on BP? Are you kidding me? Can't group all the ladies who post there into one category. Some are very classy.

[urhuckleberry]

Originally Posted by dsatterman

I agree, all these posts have somehow ventured way off topic. I was lost as soon as I saw riff/raff on BP? Are you kidding me? Can't group all the ladies who post there into one category. Some are very classy.

...and some very classy ladies here are (former) BP advertisers... Tomorrow's classy ladies may be today's BP advertisers... if given good advice.... and a chance.

One thing for sure - it's hard to fix "no class"

JMO

Huck

[guest031513-1]

This thread was just as much for drama as anything else I have seen in the AR forum lately, we should all know by now that beating a dead horse will never bring it back to life. Lets at least keep it on topic if we have legit discussion. I am not back as a mod but had some time to glance over a few threads. Anymore off topic discussion or insults in this thread and I will issue points, not warnings.

[dsatterman]

Originally Posted by urhuckleberry

...and some very classy ladies here are (former) BP advertisers... Tomorrow's classy ladies may be today's BP advertisers... if given good advice.... and a chance.

One thing for sure - it's hard to fix "no class"

JMO

Huck

So True!!