Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper
Interesting questions at the moment:
The shooter had no ID but the ID'd him via DNA? How the fcuk does that happen so quickly? And how would they have his DNA on file? The military and arrested get DNA swabbed... how would a 20 yo be on file?
A 20 yo without a digital/social media footprint? Okay.. strange but not incredibly so.
The FBI couldn't crack his phone? Say what? The Feds have the root tools to defeat any phone security.
Seems like maybe the FBI can't be trusted.
|
FBI used the serial number on the assault rifle to trace it back to the shooters father. Maybe they used the facial recognition software to id the shooter before doing the DNA test.
Somehow they got a hold of the shooter's voter id card which had an address. Not sure how the FBI used it, it they did use it.
The shooter ate lunch by himself for four years of high school. He did not socialize much. That would explain a lack of a social media footprint. If he was bullied a lot why would he want to eat lunch with other people?
Perhaps Apple in the last release of the MAC operating system for the IPhone put some new encription on their phones.
So the FBI was working with swat team #1 and the shooter? The shooter would be allowed to get on the roof and shoot first before being neutralized by swat team #1?