Trayvon Martin's Gun and Pot photos

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Uncle Han

WTF does not believe anything because he does not know anything. He just shoots his mouth off depending upon who he wants to disagree with. Typical radical whack job always needing to pull against authority. The troll should grow up.

Spoken like a true insecure Chinaman!

[Uncle Han]

Originally Posted by WTF

Spoken like a true insecure Chinaman!

Which do you hate more blacks or Asians? You spew so much hate against all people of Color it is hard to tell. Are you gonna say you hate us all equally?

[i'va biggen]

Uncle Hand is a equal opportunity hater.

[CuteOldGuy]

Eva, seriously, you're too stupid to be playing in this forum. There must be special forums for people of your limited intellectual capacity. Please find them.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Uncle Han

Which do you hate more blacks or Asians? You spew so much hate against all people of Color it is hard to tell. Are you gonna say you hate us all equally?

I do not hate anybody, I do not care for thinks I believe to be ignorgant bs. Look in the mirror if you are having trouble figuring out wtf I mean.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

I do not hate anybody, I do not care for thinks I believe to be ignorgant bs. Look in the mirror if you are having trouble figuring out wtf I mean.

It's closing time. Last call was 30 minutes ago.

You hate yourself, but you just don't know it.

You can admit it and move on. It would be good for you.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bigtex

Now, as then, you just have to know the right places to go.

I do. And I also know the "right places" not to go.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

I believe that we are all biased. So you do not have to prove my prejudice, I freely admit it. You are the one having trouble admitting yours.

A problem you are having is integrity in the discussion. You make a global statement about "bias" ... "prejudice" ... without assigning any variable value to it ... as in ...

"bias" and/or "prejudice" about what .... nor do you "nearly-do-well" publishing want-a-be shrinks who are trying to supplement their resume with more bs publications.

In order for you to even appear as though you might win discussion (I've seen you do it before) YOU DEFINE the discussion and then fill it with meaningless and irrelevant "points" ....

......... you are talking about skin color and I am talking about brands of ice cream.

That's the way it will always be with you, simply because you are trying to win ...

A Discussion .... just any discussion ...

.... to give the appearance you are intellectually superior ... that makes you feel better....

.... about yourself.

I realize you don't know it ... because that is YOUR STANDARD.

You just don't know.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

Then, depending or the result, we can debate how the jury got it right/wrong, depending on our 'beliefs'.

I hit this one (nail) squarely on the head.

How on earth can anyone be so presumptuous as to "debate how the jury got it right/wrong" .... without ever hearing the evidence, the discussion of the attorneys, AND the Court's instructions and questions to the Jury?

What an absolutely, ignorant thing to even suggest!

WTF I rarely call anyone names on here...but you are the worst kind of dumbshit.

You don't know how dumb you are, and you are so dumb it circles back on you.

Saying you are "ignorant" is too generous ... because ignorance is curable. Theoretically.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Eva, seriously, you're too stupid to be playing in this forum. There must be special forums for people of your limited intellectual capacity. Please find them.

Hahahahahahaha funny Hanoi Jane . Spoken by one of the most anti Americans on the board. You must be after Uncle Han's junk now.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

A problem you are having is integrity in the discussion. You make a global statement about "bias" ... "prejudice" ... without assigning any variable value to it ... as in ...

"bias" and/or "prejudice" about what .... nor do you "nearly-do-well" publishing want-a-be shrinks who are trying to supplement their resume with more bs publications.

In order for you to even appear as though you might win discussion (I've seen you do it before) YOU DEFINE the discussion and then fill it with meaningless and irrelevant "points" ....

......... you are talking about skin color and I am talking about brands of ice cream.

That's the way it will always be with you, simply because you are trying to win ...

A Discussion .... just any discussion ...

.... to give the appearance you are intellectually superior ... that makes you feel better....

.... about yourself.

I realize you don't know it ... because that is YOUR STANDARD.

You just don't know.

LexusLover this is a hoot....you think you know why I am posting!

You have a belief that you present as fact.

I present my beliefs as beliefs.

I think were are all biased and I presented why I thought so.

Originally Posted by LexusLover

You hate yourself, but you just don't know it.

.

I hate myself, another belief by you LexusLover or is this a fact?

People that disagree with you must hate themselves, right LL. That is the scientific data you are working with. Son your brain is stuck in the 1950, the scientific world has passed you by.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

I hit this one (nail) squarely on the head. Yea your head

How on earth can anyone be so presumptuous as to "debate how the jury got it right/wrong" .... without ever hearing the evidence, the discussion of the attorneys, AND the Court's instructions and questions to the Jury?


.

How can anyone debate anything without having been there you pompous ass?

That is wtf this whole thread has been about, speculation, including yours. Not that you will ever admit to any speculating or bias/racism.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

That is wtf this whole thread has been about, speculation, including yours. Not that you will ever admit to any speculating or bias/racism.

Of course I won't "admit to any speculating" about the outcome of a trial when I don't know shit about the FACTS because I was not there ... that's YOUR luxury dimwit.

You and your flock of blind sheep are so wrapped up in your prejudice and racism that you dutiful follow each other along like a bunch of chorus girls spouting your bullshit.

My "speculation" would only be how little matter exists between your ears.

You are going to "debate" about why a jury made a certain decision? Really? Really?

[CJOHN]

<P>&lt;P&gt;wtf you think this is cover for bp and oil....fucking hush money &lt;/P&gt;. The most fucking state in the world</P>

[CJOHN]

<P><IMG class=inlineimg border=0 alt=0 src="http://cdn-w.eccie.net/images/smilies/modern/mf_zap.gif" smilieid="553">

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Of course I won't "admit to any speculating" about the outcome of a trial when I don't know shit about the FACTS because I was not there ... that's YOUR luxury dimwit.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>You and your flock of blind sheep are so wrapped up in your prejudice and racism that you dutiful follow each other along like a bunch of chorus girls spouting your bullshit.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>My "speculation" would only be how little matter exists between your ears.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>You are going to "debate" about why a jury made a certain decision? Really? Really?

</P><P>&nbsp;stfu you figure the right amount of DZUG where does not notice</P>