Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > Texas > Austin > The Sandbox - Austin
test
The Sandbox - Austin The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here. If it's NOT an adult-themed topic, then it belongs here

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 267
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70799
biomed163389
Yssup Rider61090
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48713
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42891
The_Waco_Kid37233
CryptKicker37224
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Thread Closed
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-24-2017, 06:51 PM   #391
Austin Ellen
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 248809
Join Date: Jun 25, 2014
Posts: 5,654
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

And you are starting to sound like Jeremiah Wright. Do you even like white people? It sounds like you don't.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Milly23 View Post
Lol so now it's Obama that has offended you? Why are you trying so hard to equate someone else to offenses that people have felt from Trump with racial insensitivity. So you know what Obama really believes now? Obama denounced the statement. How long did it take Trump to denounce David Duke. He took a long time to denounce the anti Semitic things that were happening. If you want to go do that road, just assuming you know how some really feels. I'm going to start saying I know that Trump really is the racist, sexual harassing, anti Semitic, misogynistic guy who likes likes being pissed on. So yeah please stop trying to make parallel examples for you to be offended in a way to less what Trump has done that were racially offensive. You sound like the person with no kids telling the parent they know how they feel because they have a dog that's like a son to you. It's not the same.
Austin Ellen is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 07:24 PM   #392
Milly23
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Dallas
Posts: 294
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin Ellen View Post
And you are starting to sound like Jeremiah Wright. Do you even like white people? It sounds like you don't.

Oh I do? How do I sound like Wright? Where did I say anything about white people? I actually said things that people who are white say about Trump. But yes I don't discriminate. I have friends who are white, Asian, Indian, of all religions. Funny thing is majority of my of my friend are white. Nice try though. Sounds like you didn't like me assuming things about Trump. But it's ok for you to assume things.
Milly23 is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 07:35 PM   #393
Austin Ellen
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 248809
Join Date: Jun 25, 2014
Posts: 5,654
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

No, it's not alright to assume things. I admit I do sometimes but I try not to do so.







Quote:
Originally Posted by Milly23 View Post
Oh I do? How do I sound like Wright? Where did I say anything about white people? I actually said things that people who are white say about Trump. But yes I don't discriminate. I have friends who are white, Asian, Indian, of all religions. Funny thing is majority of my of my friend are white. Nice try though. Sounds like you didn't like me assuming things about Trump. But it's ok for you to assume things.
Austin Ellen is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 07:40 PM   #394
Milly23
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Dallas
Posts: 294
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin Ellen View Post
No, it's not alright to assume things. I admit I do sometimes but I try not to do so.
No it's not. And that's all I was getting out when saying what I could assume of Trump. You assume you know what Obama thinks. You don't. He denounced the guy and left then church. Assuming he believed something because you feel a way, that's not productive.
Milly23 is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 08:16 PM   #395
Austin Ellen
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 248809
Join Date: Jun 25, 2014
Posts: 5,654
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Yes, I use to train leasing agents and "assuming" something was at the top of my no-no list. What is that saying - about making an ass out of myself if I assume or something like that.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Milly23 View Post
No it's not. And that's all I was getting out when saying what I could assume of Trump. You assume you know what Obama thinks. You don't. He denounced the guy and left then church. Assuming he believed something because you feel a way, that's not productive.
Austin Ellen is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 08:30 PM   #396
Cap'n Crunch
Living in a Cereal World
 
Cap'n Crunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 25, 2016
Location: West Coast
Posts: 3,048
Encounters: 120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin Ellen View Post
Yes, I use to train leasing agents and "assuming" something was at the top of my no-no list. What is that saying - about making an ass out of myself if I assume or something like that.
How many of you assumed Obama was a Muslim because of his name (or because of what twisted agenda-based assfucks told you to believe) ?
Cap'n Crunch is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 08:38 PM   #397
Cap'n Crunch
Living in a Cereal World
 
Cap'n Crunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 25, 2016
Location: West Coast
Posts: 3,048
Encounters: 120
Default

When people are outraged that Trump took so long to (weakly) denounce David Duke, it was not based on assumption. The things reasonable people object about Trump are mostly based on in-your-face observation and fact, not assumptions.
Cap'n Crunch is offline  
Old 04-24-2017, 09:02 PM   #398
Austin Ellen
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 248809
Join Date: Jun 25, 2014
Posts: 5,654
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Wow, how many of you - this is why we have a hard time in America to have a decent dialog with each other- you are separating a segment of America that voted for the Trump. You also like to belittle other people's opinion.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch View Post
How many of you assumed Obama was a Muslim because of his name (or because of what twisted agenda-based assfucks told you to believe) ?
Austin Ellen is offline  
Old 04-25-2017, 04:12 PM   #399
pussycat
Valued Poster
 
pussycat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 31, 2011
Location: Memorial area Houston
Posts: 2,067
Encounters: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch View Post
How many of you assumed Obama was a Muslim because of his name (or because of what twisted agenda-based assfucks told you to believe) ?
When a person has an Arabic/Muslim name, went to Muslim schools as a child, was registered in the Islamic country of his residence as a Muslim (Indonesia) had parents who were Muslim, and then stated as an adult in a Presidential campaign that he was a Muslim....

Gee someone might "assume" that he's a Muslim.

Incidentally when a person is a Muslim he cannot cease to be a Muslim or join a different faith without becoming an apostate, which is punishable by death, to wit: a sword lopping off their head.

So if you claim that Obama somehow and magically was no longer a Muslim when the documentation from governments and institutions says he was, then you are claiming he was an apostate, which is NOT POSSIBLE given that he recently appeared in Muslim countries unmolested.

After taking office in 2009 his earliest trips were to a series of Muslim countries. Remember that? While there he met with various Muslim authorities and assured them in private that he never left the faith and that he was NOT an apostate and that they therefore had no grounds for issuance of any fatwas or rulings calling for his assassination.

Did you forget about that trip?
pussycat is offline  
Old 04-25-2017, 04:34 PM   #400
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,684
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX View Post
I'm still pissed at Republicans, and I am a registered Republican, for not voting on Garland to replace Scalia. Simply no justification for that. Just bring it to a vote. If Garland is rejected, fine. But to not vote was a disgrace.
I would agree with you, speedy, except for the Biden Rule. And the Schumer Rule. And the Reid Rule.

All 3 of those Democrats are on videotape stating as a matter of policy and principle the Senate should NOT consider any Supreme Court nominee during the last 12-18 months of a Republican President's term. You can look those videos up on youtube.

So it's utterly untrue to say there was "no justification" for what the Republicans did to Garland. In fact, they specifically justified waiting until after the November election by pointing to the public statements of Biden, Schumer and Reid!

The Dems made their bed, but didn't want to sleep in it! What's good for the goose is good for the gander!
lustylad is offline  
Old 04-25-2017, 05:07 PM   #401
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,684
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milly23 View Post
I know you were trying to show you understood. But please don't compare the two. That's so bad. I can understand not liking the things that the Clinton's have done. I personally have never been a huge Hillary fan. But to compare disliking a person for what they've done politically is not the same as having a guy say racially insensitive things that offend you.

Trump has said things like "great relationship with the blacks", he was sued for not renting to African Americans, he didn't apologize for calling for the deaths of innocent minority kids, he said that blacks are lazy because of inherited traits, he said that blacks live in communities with violence that you can't walk down the street in (to an all white audience no less), "look at my African-American over there". Just a few things that were offensive.

Now you may disagree with the Clintons on policy. But what have they said that has offended you in anyway in the way Trump has to African Americans? If it has anything to do with Bill Clinton and women. You should leave that argument at home because Fox News and Trump play in that field too.

Be disgusted with the Clintons. They bring it on themselves at times. But to compare being offended by them the way African Americans are by Trump is a false parallel.
C'mon millsy. You can't be serious. Your argument collapses under the weight of its own contradictions. I won't presume to be able to measure how deeply Trump offends you. I won't try to pooh-pooh or downplay or dismiss your feelings. Yet that is precisely what you are trying to do to other people who are deeply offended by the Clintons!

You have no basis for saying the Clintons offend me any more or less than Trump offends you. We're talking about visceral reactions, not mere policy disagreements. Just because your negative visceral reaction to Trump is triggered by his perceived racial insensitivity doesn't make it any more intense or deeply felt than someone else's negative visceral reaction to the Clintons triggered by, say, their perceived insensitivity to coal miners.

Your argument is unwinnable. If Trump offends you so much, you should be able to feel empathy toward others who say they are deeply offended by the Clintons. Otherwise, you're being a narcissist who thinks only your feelings matter.
lustylad is offline  
Old 04-25-2017, 05:11 PM   #402
Milly23
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Dallas
Posts: 294
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
I would agree with you, speedy, except for the Biden Rule. And the Schumer Rule. And the Reid Rule.

All 3 of those Democrats are on videotape stating as a matter of policy and principle the Senate should NOT consider any Supreme Court nominee during the last 12-18 months of a Republican President's term. You can look them up on youtube.

So it's utterly untrue to say there was "no justification" for what the Republicans did to Garland. In fact, they specifically justified waiting until after the November election by pointing to the public statements of Biden, Schumer and Reid!

The Dems made their bed, but didn't want to sleep in it! What's good for the goose is good for the gander!

Lol public statements are so easy to remember when they work in your favor. Want to hear some public statements about people being under investigations that now we don't think about..

Chief of Staff Priebus:
FBI probe alone enough that Clinton shouldn’t have been President.

Kellyanne Conway:
“Most honest people I know are not under FBI investigation, let alone two.”

Paul Ryan:
Said that Clinton shouldn't receive classified briefings while under investigation.

Not to mention Michael Flynn chanting lock her up when he's the one doing illegal things.

Sean Spicer talked about investigations, Pence, Trump.

But we now know that Clinton wasn't the only one under investigation. Yet those public statements aren't really being used as justification are they? I mean if the Speaker of the House truly thinks no one under investigation should receive classified data, that would mean people in the Trump administration since it's currently, and during the election, under investigation.

My point is, it's funny how you want to talk about the Biden Rule as a reason to hold open a SC seat because it was a statement about a hypothetical seat. The statements above were not hypothetical, they were Republicans on their high horses talking about how bad Clinton was being under FBI investigation. And now they aren't singing the same tone knowing that the other guy was too. I guess those public statements are only justification to break precedent. Since the Democrats never refused to hold a hearing for a nominee.
Milly23 is offline  
Old 04-25-2017, 05:12 PM   #403
Cap'n Crunch
Living in a Cereal World
 
Cap'n Crunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 25, 2016
Location: West Coast
Posts: 3,048
Encounters: 120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pussycat View Post
Incidentally when a person is a Muslim he cannot cease to be a Muslim or join a different faith without becoming an apostate, which is punishable by death, to wit: a sword lopping off their head.
Debunked nonsense, however, I would expect nothing less from a racist bigot like pussycat. All the lies about Obama were tailor-made for gullible racists like him.
Cap'n Crunch is offline  
Old 04-25-2017, 05:19 PM   #404
Milly23
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Dallas
Posts: 294
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
C'mon millsy. You can't be serious. Your argument collapses under the weight of its own contradictions. I won't presume to be able to measure how deeply Trump offends you. I won't try to pooh-pooh or downplay or dismiss your feelings. Yet that is precisely what you are trying to do to other people who are deeply offended by the Clintons!

You have no basis for saying the Clintons offend me any more or less than Trump offends you. We're talking about visceral reactions, not mere policy disagreements. Just because your negative visceral reaction to Trump is triggered by his perceived racial insensitivity doesn't make it any more intense or deeply felt than someone else's negative visceral reaction to the Clintons triggered by, say, their perceived insensitivity to coal miners.

Your argument is unwinnable. If Trump offends you so much, you should be able to feel empathy toward others who say they are deeply offended by the Clintons. Otherwise, you're being a narcissist who thinks only your feelings matter.
That's the thing, you started out by saying you can't measure how much he offends me. She did not in her response. She said she can get it because the Clintons offend her. And there is a difference between being offended by say coal miners and being offended by things that are racist in nature. If you can't understand the difference than I'm sorry. Coal mining is a job. Coal miners get paid for their work. Slaves did not. There weren't separate but equal laws for coal miners. If you can't see the difference in being offended by the racial aspects, idk what to tell you. I said I could understand being offended by the Clintons. I was empathetic to that. But to try to but the two feelings on the same footing, I won't do that. It's not the same. It isn't being narcissistic either.
Milly23 is offline  
Old 04-25-2017, 05:30 PM   #405
Cap'n Crunch
Living in a Cereal World
 
Cap'n Crunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 25, 2016
Location: West Coast
Posts: 3,048
Encounters: 120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pussycat View Post
When a person has an Arabic/Muslim name, went to Muslim schools as a child, was registered in the Islamic country of his residence as a Muslim (Indonesia) had parents who were Muslim, and then stated as an adult in a Presidential campaign that he was a Muslim....

Gee someone might "assume" that he's a Muslim.

Politifact.com rates claims as Pants-on-Fire wrong
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...public-school/

"Obama's father is sometimes described as an atheist, while his stepfather drank alcohol, forbidden in Islam. Obama's American mother, Ann Dunham, rejected organized religion, according to several accounts. Obama has summed up his own faith history by saying he didn't grow up in any particular religious tradition."


'its contention that Obama attended a madrassa that taught Wahabism seems to be a wholesale invention designed to frighten voters. We rate the claim Pants-on-Fire wrong.'

Pretty much anything pussycat says comes from the far right fringe land of make believe. Zero integrity.
Cap'n Crunch is offline  
Thread Closed



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved