Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > Texas > Houston > Coed Discussions - Houston
test
Coed Discussions - Houston Both male and female members can mingle and interact here. Let's keep these discussions on-topic, thought-provoking, and more importantly...entertaining!

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 278
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163215
Yssup Rider60894
gman4453291
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48644
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42553
CryptKicker37215
The_Waco_Kid36974
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-13-2013, 05:27 PM   #16
enderwiggin
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Posts: 3,711
Encounters: 69
Default

Split hairs with mealy-mouthed rationalizations all you want. Bottom line: you know very well what the intent behind the rule is. If you abided by it, you wouldn't be asking this inane question.
enderwiggin is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 05:28 PM   #17
Eccie Addict
Former Post Ho
 
Eccie Addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 13, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 13,863
Encounters: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enderwiggin View Post
Why should he have to? The rule is pretty clear: don't share ROS information. It doesn't state when the information becomes ROS or give a statute of limitations or invite discussion/interpretation. Don't share ROS information. Seems pretty simple and straight-forward to me.

The better question is this one: even if you were inclined to share ROS information -- regardless of when -- why would you post publicly admitting to it? Why even invite the drama and controversy, demand of the staff/ownership to come interpret the rules because you think you've found some goofy gray area where you can abide by the letter, but not the spirit of the staffs' intent? We can all read between the lines: you want to set the staff up for failure. No matter which way this comes down, somebody's pissed. There's either a loophole for people to share reviews or you get to puff yourself up with righteous indignation and say the staff is kissing WU's ass. Talk about bad-attitude brigade. WU isn't underhanded enough to do something like this... This is a new low.

Not that he needs it from the likes of me, but my counsel to St. C is to ignore this bullshit altogether and let time unruffle the drama-queen's feathers.
You are absolutely right in the fact he shouldn't have to. However if its left up for discussion which it obviously is then we have threads like this and two answers from two different mods. He answers then its put to rest period no fuss.

He certainly doesn't have to and to be honest it makes no difference to me.
Eccie Addict is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 05:30 PM   #18
Champagne Brown
Upgraded Female Account
 
Champagne Brown's Avatar
 
User ID: 2799
Join Date: Dec 19, 2009
Location: SA
My Bio Page
Posts: 8,836
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

Hold on to your seats its going to be a bumpy ride
Champagne Brown is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 05:30 PM   #19
Dorian Gray
Für die beeinflussen
 
Dorian Gray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 15, 2012
Location: Not where I wanna be
Posts: 21,022
Encounters: 61
Default

Dorian Gray is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 05:32 PM   #20
blowpop
Valued Poster
 
blowpop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 6, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,439
Encounters: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enderwiggin View Post
Split hairs with mealy-mouthed rationalizations all you want. Bottom line: you know very well what the intent behind the rule is. If you abided by it, you wouldn't be asking this inane question.
Seriously, Ender? "Mealy-mouthed"? How many times have you now insulted me in this thread?

With all due respect, you don't seem to have the temperament to moderate a board like Eccie.
blowpop is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 05:36 PM   #21
enderwiggin
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Posts: 3,711
Encounters: 69
Default

Maybe so, but this is pretty ridiculous of you to put the staff/ownership in a position like this. I don't think I've insulted you, rather I've characterized your conduct... (See I can play these cute little rhetorical games too.) It makes no difference to me if St. C asks me step aside as a mod. Send your little complaint and let the chips fall where they may.
enderwiggin is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 05:37 PM   #22
Eccie Addict
Former Post Ho
 
Eccie Addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 13, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 13,863
Encounters: 25
Default

You'd be surprised BP.

I think he has the perfect temperament. Ever notice he never really comes down on one side or the other. Pretty equal about things IMO.
Eccie Addict is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 05:39 PM   #23
VictoriaLyn
Upgraded Female Account
 
VictoriaLyn's Avatar
 
User ID: 2709
Join Date: Dec 16, 2009
Location: Austin
My Bio Page
Posts: 6,767
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

The entire review(ros and all) can be shared with the lady BEFORE it is posted here...
VictoriaLyn is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 05:40 PM   #24
Pistolero
Bang! Bang an Ambassador
 
Pistolero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,987
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jusanotherdude View Post
The way that I understand it is, that comments made by you are yours to share as the only infringement on private content is your own..... that being said, as soon as the info is posted it is considered PA info and if the provider then posts what she's been told then she is in violation of the guidelines and is subject to the resulting punishment. But you as the posters of the original content are not in violation...... so basically..... you telling TheCFE about the ROS is fine.... her posting about it is not......

Clear as mud?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pistolero View Post
Here is my take on that.

If you post it, there are comments on the review and she wants to know what you said and you tell her, not OK. Once you post it , the PA rules apply..

Since it was obvious that JAD and I did see it a little different, I went and got the correct view. And JAD is correct. I am wrong. You can give her your comments, but if she comments on it, then she is in violation.





Quote:
Originally Posted by Champagne Brown View Post
Hold on to your seats its going to be a bumpy ride
Nothing to see here folks, move along.
Pistolero is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 05:42 PM   #25
blowpop
Valued Poster
 
blowpop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 6, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,439
Encounters: 26
Default

Thank you, Pistolero.
blowpop is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 05:49 PM   #26
Raptorcg
Gaining Momentum
 
Raptorcg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 27, 2013
Location: Sofa North of Houston
Posts: 87
Encounters: 6
Default

Isn't the real intent, To stop other members from sharing your ROS with the providers or persons without ROS access.

And the spirit of that from my understanding is to allow those posting reviews to feel free to be honest without the fear of retaliation or ThreadWars.

So if a provider admitted another board member gave them the ROS, without posters knowledge or ok, is a violation.

I don't see why sharing between the two or more people directly involved in the review in question, before posting, is even an issue, just a personal choice.
Raptorcg is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 06:04 PM   #27
blowpop
Valued Poster
 
blowpop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 6, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,439
Encounters: 26
Default

Raptor, I always assumed the logic behind ROS secrecy was to encourage guys who were worried about provider retaliation to be honest in their reviews. We all know that leaks happen, and with the rule in place mods can deal with WKs who share information that reviewers want to have kept private.

I was surprised (OK, not all that surprised, considering his history) when tried to spin my sharing my review of the session with a provider with her into some sort of rules violation. It never occurred to me that it would be considered so on Eccie, and thus my request for clarification.
blowpop is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 06:13 PM   #28
Raptorcg
Gaining Momentum
 
Raptorcg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 27, 2013
Location: Sofa North of Houston
Posts: 87
Encounters: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blowpop View Post
Raptor, I always assumed the logic behind ROS secrecy was to encourage guys who were worried about provider retaliation to be honest in their reviews. We all know that leaks happen, and with the rule in place mods can deal with WKs who share information that reviewers want to have kept private.

I was surprised (OK, not all that surprised, considering his history) when tried to spin my sharing my review of the session with a provider with her into some sort of rules violation. It never occurred to me that it would be considered so on Eccie, and thus my request for clarification.
Sure, I get why you asked the question, and in the short life of the thread we can already see a small divide of a sort, so clarification seems like a good idea. There also seems to be a lot of hungry people eating popcorn, waiting for the action scenes
Raptorcg is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 07:12 PM   #29
Jusanotherdude
Ambassadude
 
Jusanotherdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: Lone Star State
Posts: 6,427
Encounters: 24
Default

Ok..... here us my non-mod response in regards to this: Why?

What Earthly good can honestly come from sharing what will be ROS /PA content with the lady FOR the lady?

Let's be honest, the chances any type of "constructive criticism " that many may argue would be reasons, would almost CERTAINLY be overly flowery and glossed over. Chances are the reviews would only be a way of making the hobbyist look better to said provider to curry favor for future visits. Which is fine for the hobbyist to be sure. But again, what are the gains for the provider? Hoe many of these "shared" reviews do think ACTUALLY contained useful to the provider info like "TCB skills need work", "breath was less than fresh/bad", "incall smelled like shit or was nasty/dirty", or something of the like? I would venture to guess pretty Damn close (if not absolutely ) zero!

Meanwhile she stands to gain points and or a ban for posting she is in the know. She gets to wear that veil of being one who t again and reacts to her reviews which may persuade others yo not review her on future visits.

Whether you and she feel she has the right to know or not, that is not how this board is setup.
Jusanotherdude is offline   Quote
Old 05-13-2013, 08:00 PM   #30
Raptorcg
Gaining Momentum
 
Raptorcg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 27, 2013
Location: Sofa North of Houston
Posts: 87
Encounters: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jusanotherdude View Post
Ok..... here us my non-mod response in regards to this: Why?

What Earthly good can honestly come from sharing what will be ROS /PA content with the lady FOR the lady?

Let's be honest, the chances any type of "constructive criticism " that many may argue would be reasons, would almost CERTAINLY be overly flowery and glossed over. Chances are the reviews would only be a way of making the hobbyist look better to said provider to curry favor for future visits. Which is fine for the hobbyist to be sure. But again, what are the gains for the provider? Hoe many of these "shared" reviews do think ACTUALLY contained useful to the provider info like "TCB skills need work", "breath was less than fresh/bad", "incall smelled like shit or was nasty/dirty", or something of the like? I would venture to guess pretty Damn close (if not absolutely ) zero!

Meanwhile she stands to gain points and or a ban for posting she is in the know. She gets to wear that veil of being one who t again and reacts to her reviews which may persuade others yo not review her on future visits.

Whether you and she feel she has the right to know or not, that is not how this board is setup.
Perhaps asking it from another direction and see if you feel the same way: If providers could review Hobbyist and openly post them with a section only providers could see, would you like to have a chance to see it first, Good or Bad, if the provider offered too?

Professionals/Adults should take critiques as an area they can improve, of course that assumes everyone is adult and professional, which does not seem to pan out in real life, unfortunately.

This discussion has been going back an forth for a long time, I recall this very same issue on some adult Bulletin Boards way back before internet was not everywhere and you were the shit if you had a 9.6K dial up modem. It will not get solved here, it will just be a Mod saying “Thy will be done, now bow before me”, and we move on to more list wars...lol
Raptorcg is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved