Box Score

[Illegal Use Of Hands]

My point is if you set a date with a BP person, say one of 5 that share a phone, how is that person's age verified? If one phone number is shown how does one know the age of each of the people sharing the phone?

[Chica Chaser]

Originally Posted by single1

Thank you RJ. Very well written and excellent points.

I can honestly say I have never seen so much activity our board since the heyday of UtrSkr and his South Texas UTR's. Now that guy, nobody fucked with him. I am a nobody so I don't get that treatment. LOL

Now...can we all get back to fucking hot age verified women???

Oh no, we "fucked" with him too. I think there was another one too at one point here that we "fucked" with.

Originally Posted by UtrSkr

RJ Dinner = Muchos Huevos. Props to him

And props to you Single1.

A lot of people are proud of you

Keep bringing it, I promise no more therapy sessions will be needed.

Didn't we?

[dearhunter]

IUOH, BP has that responsibility. They become the gatekeeper when she places an AD with them. You are taking the risk that she is of appropriate age. If at some later date, your review proves to be other than it should be. It will be addressed at that time.

There can be immediate exceptions. There was a case in one city forum where there was a BP review that was of a hooktard that was suspect. After investigation, the review was pulled as a precaution.

There have been other situations I cannot discuss as they are not on the open board.

The short answer still remains that you can review BP whores.

[Guest110516]

It doesn't look like the mods will be looking at this issue in other areas. As I mentioned in the other thread, those of us with spare time will need to look in other areas for posts that violate the UTR rules and RTM them ourselves.

[Illegal Use Of Hands]

Wait. BP has that responsibility? But, the fact is that a review would still be allowed here on ECCIE and you are acknowledging that age verification in this instance is really not an issue with ECCIE. That isn't consistent with your policy being applied to an individual who is acting as a go between as S1 does. There seems to be faulty logic here. An inconsistency in rule application.

[Chica Chaser]

Originally Posted by Illegal Use Of Hands

This is all very confusing and I don't really go in depth on this site. I stick to a couple of boards. Seriously, these threads are like reading a novel now. So, are we allowed to review BP girls? They obviously do have a contact number and in many cases several girls share one phone. But, they aren't necessarily an agency. So can we review them?

You really should catch up before posting. As has been stated at least a dozen times around here, there are no restrictions on writing reviews. There are restrictions on receiving PA credit for those reviews, those have been in place across the site since its inception.

Originally Posted by Illegal Use Of Hands

But, how does that verify age dearhunter? Which seems to be the issue.

The age verification requirements don't apply to reviews, only to ads here.

Originally Posted by Illegal Use Of Hands

My point is if you set a date with a BP person, say one of 5 that share a phone, how is that person's age verified? If one phone number is shown how does one know the age of each of the people sharing the phone?

That ad is not on Eccie, so its your ass on the line if she ends up being under age. Now, if it comes up later and is shown that the girl in the review you bragged all about fucking is in fact underage, we will remove that review from view. And your ass is still on the line, for obvious reasons that we are trying to prevent here as then Guideline #10 comes into play;

#10 - Topics regarding children, and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board. You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges.

Originally Posted by emptywallet

It doesn't look like the mods will be looking at this issue in other areas. As I mentioned in the other thread, those of us with spare time will need to look in other areas for posts that violate the UTR rules and RTM them ourselves.

Still haven't seen the first RTM on all those UTR ads out there, to date.

[the.best.gfe.ever]

IUOH its because when u review a bp girl generally speaking u post that she was found on bp so the site itself is a go between not an individual person.that means that they(the site) are responsible for the girls that u have found thete..correct me if I'm wrong

[Chica Chaser]

Originally Posted by Illegal Use Of Hands

Wait. BP has that responsibility? But, the fact is that a review would still be allowed here on ECCIE and you are acknowledging that age verification in this instance is really not an issue with ECCIE. That isn't consistent with your policy being applied to an individual who is acting as a go between as S1 does. There seems to be faulty logic here. An inconsistency in rule application.

No you still haven't caught on yet. Ads are one thing, Reviews are another.
That's been clarified several times now also.

[dearhunter]

CC, you can lead a donkey to water. But, you can't make him thinck.......and ADs in reviews are still ADs.

[Illegal Use Of Hands]

Last time I checked Single 1 hasn't put an add. Just reviews.

What I did read is that S1 can't be the contact for the meet up with the utr. (PROBLEM, remember that in the sticky?) in my own review. Does that mean I can't put "p.m. single 1" for contact info on my review?

But, some BP number (which has no age verification) or just her personal number is fine? I don't mean to be bothering you, I just want to be able to write a proper review.

[Guest110516]

Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

Still haven't seen the first RTM on all these UTR ads out there, to date.

I'll check them on my timeline, not yours. Feel free to beat me to the punch, look through each one individually, and let us know why they are not in violation.

[dearhunter]

Originally Posted by single1

I asked her if she wanted to go to CC and I will let you know if she wants to go.

On the plus side, KATI would like to go see you guys. She is thinking of going either Friday May 1-Sunday May 03 or go on Monday 4th through Wednesday the 6th.

Let me know guys in CC if that works

Thinck donkey.........thinck ^^^^^^^^ this is an AD for a different whore in his own review of one of his whores.

Originally Posted by Illegal Use Of Hands

Last time I checked Single 1 hasn't put an add. Just reviews.

What I did read is that S1 can't be the contact for the meet up with the utr. (PROBLEM, remember that in the sticky?) in my own review. Does that mean I can't put "p.m. single 1" for contact info on my review?

But, some BP number (which has no age verification) or just her personal number is fine? I don't mean to be bothering you, I just want to be able to write a proper review.

Yes, you can put s1 as the contact for your review. You can put Santa Claus as the point of contact for your review.........the question becomes will you get PA credit.

[Illegal Use Of Hands]

dearcunter said it. An ad in a review is still an ad. That's what I'm fucking talking about. That's the reason for my entire narrative here.

[Illegal Use Of Hands]

You are saying I can use a BP number for a contact on one of my reviews, but I can't say "pm single 1". The reason being age verification issues. But as I pointed out you cant' do that with bp either. Saying it's bp's responsibility is really a straw man argument to the debate of age verification.

[dearhunter]

CC already told you that you can put whatever you want in the contact information. What is so hard to understand about that?