Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 267
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70799
biomed163389
Yssup Rider61083
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48712
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42885
The_Waco_Kid37233
CryptKicker37224
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-03-2015, 08:24 AM   #16
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

It is simple you dumbshit.

Negotiate a better deal...a deal that doesn't let Iran have a pathway to nukes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
What is your third option ? All I have heard from the party of NO is no, but no third option. Unless you are really for military intervention.
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 08:25 AM   #17
Guest040616
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
Encounters: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
All I have heard from the party of NO is no, but no third option.
Isn't that the same strategy the Republicants have ineffectively used against Obamacare.

Same book, different verse!
Guest040616 is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 08:46 AM   #18
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,083
Encounters: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex View Post
Isn't that the same strategy the Republicants have ineffectively used against Obamacare.

Same book, different verse!
Right on, brother BT!

They're actually, RepubliWON'Ts.
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 09:01 AM   #19
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
It is simple you dumbshit.

Negotiate a better deal...a deal that doesn't let Iran have a pathway to nukes.
Then WTF do you think they are doing ? Dumbshit.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 09:23 AM   #20
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

I think, and many do, that Obama is negotiating a weak (bad for USA) deal.

It speaks to your stupidity if you think there are only 3 choices =

Do nothing and let Iran get nukes
Go to war
Accept Obama's deal








Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
Then WTF do you think they are doing ? Dumbshit.
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 10:08 AM   #21
IIFFOFRDB
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
Default

David Burge @iowahawkblog · 21h 21 hours ago
Remember: if you oppose the framework for the understanding of the eventual pathway to the framework, you're a traitor.
IIFFOFRDB is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 10:51 AM   #22
TheDaliLama
Valued Poster
 
TheDaliLama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 6, 2010
Location: Ikoyi Club 1938
Posts: 7,098
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
What is your third option ? All I have heard from the party of NO is no, but no third option. Unless you are really for military intervention.
Tell them go fuck themselves, put more sanctions on them, put the military option on the plate, ramp up our military, join in maneuvers with Saudi, Isreal, France, Germany, UK, test a few new nukes of our own, start supporting Irans opposition from with in. Let all that sink in and then ask them if they want to renogiate. But don't ever tell them the military option is off the table.
TheDaliLama is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 11:29 AM   #23
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
I think, and many do, that Obama is negotiating a weak (bad for USA) deal.

It speaks to your stupidity if you think there are only 3 choices =

Do nothing and let Iran get nukes
Go to war
Accept Obama's deal
I asked your dumb ass once what the other option was, and you said to negotiate . You are a typical right wing nut and talk in circles.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaliLama View Post
Tell them go fuck themselves, put more sanctions on them, put the military option on the plate, ramp up our military, join in maneuvers with Saudi, Israel , France, Germany, UK, test a few new nukes of our own, start supporting Iran's opposition from with in. Let all that sink in and then ask them if they want to renegotiate . But don't ever tell them the military option is off the table.
50 years of sanctions worked so well you want to impose more?
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 11:45 AM   #24
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB View Post
That's a fact.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 02:00 PM   #25
TheDaliLama
Valued Poster
 
TheDaliLama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 6, 2010
Location: Ikoyi Club 1938
Posts: 7,098
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
I asked your dumb ass once what the other option was, and you said to negotiate . You are a typical right wing nut and talk in circles.


50 years of sanctions worked so well you want to impose more?

Where do you get 50 years? I'm not sure when they started working on the nukes but I'm pretty sure it has been in the last 20 years.

And I also suggested more than just sanctions. My point being...Rather walk out, beef up the pressure and try going back to the table with a little more back bone. As they say, no deal is better than a bad deal.

And please don't come back with "It's this deal or war" that's BS. No one wants a war. If BO doesn't know what he's doing then don't blame others. Any other plans or opinions are always automatically dismissed by this President. He should be consulting with leaders from both parties before making a deal.
TheDaliLama is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 02:06 PM   #26
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaliLama View Post
Where do you get 50 years? I'm not sure when they started working on the nukes but I'm pretty sure it has been in the last 20 years.

And I also suggested more than just sanctions. My point being...Rather walk out, beef up the pressure and try going back to the table with a little more back bone. As they say, no deal is better than a bad deal.

And please don't come back with "It's this deal or war" that's BS. No one wants a war. If BO doesn't know what he's doing then don't blame others. Any other plans or opinions are always automatically dismissed by this President. He should be consulting with leaders from both parties before making a deal.
Sanctions dolly think sanctions not nukes.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 02:40 PM   #27
TheDaliLama
Valued Poster
 
TheDaliLama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 6, 2010
Location: Ikoyi Club 1938
Posts: 7,098
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
Sanctions dolly think sanctions not nukes.
Try putting together a coherent sentence. Punctuational might help.

I believe we've had sanctions on them since they took over our embassy in the mid 70s but that was less than 50 years ago but more were applied when they started their nuke program..perhaps you should focus on my total answer to you questions rather than quibbling about sanctions not working. After all it was sanctions that got to the table this last time..maybe we should try putting the fear of God in them for the next go around? We need a better deal with them and BO needs to stop worrying about his legacy cause at the rate he's going his legacy will be a mushroomed shaped cloud..
TheDaliLama is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 04:30 PM   #28
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaliLama View Post
Try putting together a coherent sentence. Punctuational might help.
That is always a good fallback position.
I believe we've had sanctions on them since they took over our embassy in the mid 70s but that was less than 50 years ago but more were applied when they started their nuke program..perhaps you should focus on my total answer to you questions rather than quibbling about sanctions not working. After all it was sanctions that got to the table this last time..maybe we should try putting the fear of God in them for the next go around? We need a better deal with them and BO needs to stop worrying about his legacy cause at the rate he's going his legacy will be a mushroomed shaped cloud..
True hasn't been that long first were in 1979 followed by more in 1995 added on in 2006. They are at the table the agreement hasn't even been written and signed so how can you tell if it is a bad one ???
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 05:45 PM   #29
nwarounder
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2010
Location: CO
Posts: 2,239
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
True hasn't been that long first were in 1979 followed by more in 1995 added on in 2006. They are at the table the agreement hasn't even been written and signed so how can you tell if it is a bad one ???
If we allow the Iranians nuclear capability and production, and their leaders are chanting "Death to America", you should be able to tell if it is a bad deal or not.

Of all the conflicts that could be solved by air strikes and drones alone, this one is the most viable.
nwarounder is offline   Quote
Old 04-03-2015, 05:46 PM   #30
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

You morons of the Austin Reacharound Club have done a good job keeping it stupid with WTF unable to post here under his banned handle.

It's the Executive branch's job to negotiate treaties. That's why there's a SECRETARY OF STATE.

It's OBAMA who snuck off and secretly began negotiations with the Iranians.

It's OBAMA who said "No deal is better than a bad deal."

OBAMA is trying to get a framework approved. Congress cannot approve or disprove a tentative, unsigned framework.

But to you morons, it's the Republicans that are the issue.

Simply put, if Obama doesn't want to fulfill his oath of office, he can leave early. At this point, Biden would be an improvement.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved