nothing prettier than a naked Weatherby
snick
If a state chooses not to set up a state health care exchange or market place, people in the state who are uninsured and earning above the poverty line can still get tax credits to purchase health coverage. Not so for people living in poverty. People with earnings below the poverty line --
$23,050 annually for a family of four -- would be left out in the cold, forced to continue relying on emergency rooms and community clinics for their care.
Refusal of this funding doesn't help state finances -- it just sets them further back. The federal government picks up the full
cost of expanding coverage for three years, and then 90 percent after that. With the tax revenue and jobs created by federal dollars, participating states come out way ahead. Refusing the deal means putting ideology ahead of both the health needs of people in the state and the state economy.
more right wing logic ... refuse Onamacare, we dont want to pay for it ... apparently they dont know they will still be paying for it anyway.
BRILLIANT!
<<< Assup // COG >>> 
