More Obama vetting; Dem Congressman accepts award from communists

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...res-our-values

Democratic Congressman Danny Davis accepts an award from the Communist Party USA in Chicago. Eight years ago this congressman was introduced by Barack Obama who told his audience that Davis shares Obama's views on the world. Birds of a feather...are communists apparently.

Obama is a communist. He's been surrounded by communists his whole life. His mother, father, grandfather, childhood mentor and pastor are all communists. Obama held his first political fund raiser in the home of a communist (Bill Ayres). Obama's so called religion is liberation theology. Liberation theology is communism disguised as Christianity.

Valerie Jarrett, by all accounts, is Obama's most trusted advisor and best friend of both Barack and Michelle. Valerie Jarrett personally selected Van Jones, also a communist, as the so called green czar. Van Jones was forced to resign after video tapes came out which revealed that he was a communist and a black nationalist. Valerie Jarrett's father in law Vernon Jarrett was a member of the Communist Party USA in Chicago. He was friends with Obama's childhood mentor Frank Marshall Davis, also a member of CPUSA. Frank Marshall Davis moved from Chicago to Hawaii in order to organize the communist party there.

Imagine if we had a Republican president who was surrounded by Klan members. Does anyone think he would get the benefit of the doubt regarding his relationship to the Klan?

http://www.maggiesnotebook.com/2011/...mmunist-youth/

[CJ7]

thats nice joe

[CJ7]

thanks for playing COG

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by CJ7

thats nice joe

Should I assume that you are ok with having a communist for president? If so, please make a case for that being a good thing for the country. This is not a joke. Some of us actually love America and don't want to see it destroyed.

Brevity isn't always the soul of wit; sometimes its just laziness.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

I cant say its wrong and you cant say its right

get it now?


no Fn credibility

The End

Exactly like "Game Change"!

get it now?


no Fn credibility

The End

[timpage]

I think the article is substantially correct in regard to the congressman's connections with the communist party, among other things.

And? You guys living in the last century who still get all wound up with the cold-war rhetoric always amuse me. The Commies are gonna get ya!! Absurd.

The idea that Obama is a communist is ridiculous. The repuke mouth-breathers all think that anybody who is a democrat is a communist. Meaningless mischaracterization.

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by timpage

I think the article is substantially correct in regard to the congressman's connections with the communist party, among other things.

And? You guys living in the last century who still get all wound up with the cold-war rhetoric always amuse me. The Commies are gonna get ya!! Absurd.

The idea that Obama is a communist is ridiculous. The repuke mouth-breathers all think that anybody who is a democrat is a communist. Meaningless mischaracterization.

People that deny that Obama is a communist after being presented with overwhelming evidence remind me of the Monty Python sketch where John Cleese trys to return a dead parrot to the pet shop and the pet shop owner pretends its not dead.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npjOSLCR2hE

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by timpage

And? You guys living in the last century who still get all wound up with the cold-war rhetoric always amuse me.

There is no doubt you are easily "amused"; you still giggle when you fart in public.

[CuteOldGuy]

CBJ7. you are correct that later testimony can't be trusted, but that doesn't mean later testimony is a lie. All I asked you was if it was true. You chose to ignore that. As usual. Ask for substance, and you get fluff. You're a fluffer. LOL! (I just got that, it's pretty funny.)

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

CBJ7. you are correct that later testimony can't be trusted, but that doesn't mean later testimony is a lie. All I asked you was if it was true. You chose to ignore that. As usual. Ask for substance, and you get fluff. You're a fluffer. LOL! (I just got that, it's pretty funny.)

goddamnit COF I answered that question early in the thread

ok, one more time, and I'll go real s-l-o-w

I cant prove its false and you cant prove its 100% true.

pay attention COF, I'll say it ONE more time

this makes THREE

I cant prove its false

~~~~~~~~~~~~

write that down and study for the rest of the week ..., pop quiz Friday 830 am sharp

[CuteOldGuy]

Ok. Thanks, CBJ7, you can't prove it's false. That's all you had to say. Can anyone prove it's false?

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Ok. Thanks, CBJ7, you can't prove it's false. That's all you had to say. Can anyone prove it's false?

I know and I said that


which brings us back to this



CBJ7. you are correct that later testimony can't be trusted


I know thats why I dont trust Beerfart and my original comment on the freakin thread, least we mention he was a hostile witness.

[CuteOldGuy]

Give it up, CBJ7. Either it's true or not, regardless of Breitbart's history. As soon as someone proves it false, we will tell your nurse to wake you.

[CJ7]

rant rant rant yammer yammer yammer

wtf wrong with you COF, did you take an IB pill or what?

LMTAO

go play with the dust particles floating in the sun rays by the window

[Whirlaway]

The Brditbart story is well documented, detailed and very beliveable.so far none of the Obsmazombied have offered up any counter set of facts, nor they have punched any holes on the Breitbsrt story......it stands uncontested except for juvenile jabs by the Obama-possessed.