Shit, while we're writing checks,

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by stikiwikit

Asshat, you are referred to Google "Greenland ice melt" and you will see article after article from respected organizations giving the truth about Greenland.

No, not if you actually read the articles or watch the opinion readers videos - you will not. That was pretty much my point by giving you both references. I even gave you a video, surmising your inability to read. But even on the written one, I made sure to include pretty charts and pictures to help you out as well as the exact article name in quotes, thinking you had enough brain cells to copy-pasta.


Here was the whole point in a nutshell; If you look at any of the fear-porn articles, they all parrot the same talking points, verbatim and usually have the same - as in exact - headline. Spoiler alert, they don't deviate much at all in their parroting coverage either. Whereas the other article, delved into related data. So instead of fear-porning (new word?), they did a little critical thinking, math, data and analysis (some bone heads call it META DATA analysis)- instead of blatant fear-poring to support an agenda.


Ever heard of Chicken Little? Oh snap! You're his liddle brother huh?

[supercold1]

“Hahaha, only in the panhandle can you GET AWAY WITH THAT!”

[supercold1]

The reason why actual science articles, not the propaganda you believe in, don’t deviate from the “talking point” is because the talking point is based on real science that has points to the same conclusion: climate change is real and humans are the cause. You can’t pump this much carbon, a greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere, without warming it up. It’s fucking physics 101, you can’t escape it. It’s as evident as gravity. But you’ll just believe everything the oil propagandists tell you.

[supercold1]

And that’s just carbon. We’re unlocking methane from the extra heat already, and methane is many times worse as greenhouse gas. It’s a cascading effect. Google put methane detectors on their mapping cars and revealed that it’s 60x+ what the EPA is telling us. Well, what do you expect? Dear Leader tells the EPA to straight up lie to the public about global warming.

[tonyscag9]

Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

-

Thats why you didn't win the majority of the vote and it looks like you won't again . But this time the Democrats will scoop up those states who barely squeeked by to Trump

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by tonyscag9

Thats why you didn't win the majority of the vote and it looks like you won't again .

He didn't win the Cocker Spaniel vote either. Doesn't matter. Or the Zombie vote, pretty sure those would go to Hitlery. We have used the electoral college system for 243 years. This ain't a popularity contest in Junior High School.

[supercold1]

Republicans have gerrymandered the entire country to undermine democracy and squeak by with electoral votes. They've packed the courts with fascists that let them do it. And they're actually proud of this. Evidence above.

[quzi]

I saw some random tweet that Greenland has 60,000 people and if Trump offered $600 billion, $10 million each would buy at least 90% of the vote.

[Idontevenknow]

Most older democrats would side with the right over the way the left is headed.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by Idontevenknow

Most older democrats would side with the right over the way the left is headed.

Not only that, but while the Demonicrats are running around blaming the other side for their own shenanigans, Trump keeps chipping away at what you could consider traditional Demonicrat voting blocks - pretty much each and everyone of them. It's almost like Trump has a strategy to peel off large chunks of their historic voting blocks base. Shoot, I bet Ol' Shotgun Joe is going to vote for Trump


What a very stable genius...

[centexguy]

Looks like the progressive nutjobs here have really gone insane. It's going to be glorious watching them freak out when Trumpslide 2020 happens. The Russian hoax failed, the racist hoax has failed, and any other fake hoax they make up will fail. The Coalition of the Fringes (Democrats) will be powerless to stop him.

[tonyscag9]

Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

He didn't win the Cocker Spaniel vote either. Doesn't matter. Or the Zombie vote, pretty sure those would go to Hitlery. We have used the electoral college system for 243 years. This ain't a popularity contest in Junior High School.

My point being, its not a silent majority when the majority didn't vote for him. He's not going to when if even LESS people vote for him now because even with the rigged system *which you're proud of I guess?, he's hurt too many people in the swing states for it to work for him this time.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by tonyscag9

My point being, its not a silent majority when the majority didn't vote for him. He's not going to when if even LESS people vote for him now because even with the rigged system *which you're proud of I guess?, he's hurt too many people in the swing states for it to work for him this time.

Jr High School does popularity contests. Rigged system?!? As in how? I must have missed that analysis. I'm sure you would support voter ID. Right? As in show a valid ID before you vote.



Maybe you should watch one of his rally's in a swing state and judge for yourself if he is popular there. Better yet, just ask the many thousand of them that can't get into the packed arena.

[Agent220]

Originally Posted by Killeeninformer2

What I find amusing is how often I see this vitriolic hatred from the side of the aisle that claims to be more caring and compassionate than the right. Kind of like how I find the majority of racists on the left these days.



There's now no longer any talking to you but at least we can point you out and sway moderates.

I see the opposite in the right...

However I too am beginning to get tired of the left as well. Both sides will continue to spend until we default and bankrupt.

[Austin Ellen]

Rigged system????? That's funny - I bet dollars to donuts that you would not say that if it were Obamma.
Trump 2020

Originally Posted by tonyscag9

My point being, its not a silent majority when the majority didn't vote for him. He's not going to when if even LESS people vote for him now because even with the rigged system *which you're proud of I guess?, he's hurt too many people in the swing states for it to work for him this time.