Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
They won't watch yer video clips... They'll just piss on
your thread in hopes the Monitours will close it.
... The liberal lads don't like evidence. ... Evidence means the truth.
Which is why they never want to see it.
Be it Kari Lake's evidence of voter fraud - or Trump's.
They won't watch yer video clips... They'll just piss on
your thread in hopes the Monitours will close it.
... The liberal lads don't like evidence. ... Evidence means the truth.
Which is why they never want to see it.
Be it Kari Lake's evidence of voter fraud - or Trump's.
#### Salty
Can voter fraud occur? Yes. Did if occur in any recent election in volume to change the results? Until proven otherwise, NO.
Where is your so-called "evidence" that fraud occured in either 2020 or 2022? Not a scenario where fraud MIGHT have occured but actual evidence that fraud occured.
It’s not what you think. The only thing that moved forward in that case is whether she can show that procedurally Maricopa County allowed mismatched signatures. But Lake has no evidence of that happening. It’s not the trial you think it is Salty. More disappointing news coming your way.
Watch her video?
Videos can easily be edited to include fake information. As we've seen numerous times on fox news.
Post #11 has a link to an NPR article. It shoots down numerous claims lake has made.
You think there is evidence in her video?
This is typical misinformation salty (and trumpys and fox viewers peddle).
The "promise" of forthcoming evidence is frequently made and seldom fulfilled. And even though fox and co were lying their asses off and admitted it, the right's promises of evidence has yet to arrive.
It looks like calling you out on your lies is what you call "pissing" on your thread. You would say that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again
... Mate, they're all one-way.
They won't watch yer video clips... They'll just piss on
your thread in hopes the Monitours will close it. We love evidence. You hate it. You claim lake and trump have evidence of voter fraud.
It's been over 2 years. Where is it? What is it?
We're way past waiting on seeing this "evidence". You personally make claims on a regular basis without supplying any source whatsoever. I can't recall any of your "wait and see" predictions coming true.
If you can find evidence in her video, why can't you find it in a printed source?
We know why. Because fox somewhat learned their lesson.
... The liberal lads don't like evidence. ... Evidence means the truth.
Which is why they never want to see it.
Be it Kari Lake's evidence of voter fraud - or Trump's.
Mr courtroom insiders say it’s going swimmingly. Evidently her first or second witness explained how meticulously the staff reviewing signatures were in comparing the ballots and the amount of training they had, along with the multiple layers of review.
Lakes strategy is unique to say the least, along the same lines of other Trumpys in court. By showing the opposite of her claim she believes she’ll somehow win. Brilliant.
Kari Lake Attorney: Maricopa County's Own Data Shows Massive Issue with Review of 334K Ballots
By Randy DeSoto May 17, 2023 at 12:17pm
Kurt Olsen — the attorney representing Arizona Republican Kari Lake in her challenge of Democrat Katie Hobbs’ victory in November’s governor’s race — said in court Wednesday that a review of data from Maricopa County showed at least 334,000 mail-in ballots were in effect not verified.
By the official tally, Hobbs prevailed in the contest by approximately 17,000 votes, or 0.7 percent of the more than 2.5 million ballots cast statewide, but Lake is questioning the legitimacy of tens of thousands of those ballots.
“Maricopa’s own log data shows that over 264,000 ballots were reviewed [for vote signature matches] at a rate less than 3 seconds [and] 70,000 at a rate of less than 2 seconds,” Olsen told Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson.
“In addition, testimony that Level 2 reviewers were so overwhelmed that they simply didn’t look at the signatures that were piling up on their desk. They simply kicked them back for the Level 1 reviewers to take another look at,” the lawyer said.
“That’s not signature review, your honor,” Olsen said.
Kari Lake War Room
@KariLakeWarRoom
Kurt Olsen: “Maricopa’s own log data shows that over 264,000 ballots were reviewed at a rate less than 3 seconds and 70,000 at a rate of less than 2 seconds.
In addition, testimony that level 2 reviewers were so overwhelmed that they simply didn’t look at the signatures.”
The process in Maricopa County — the Phoenix metro area — is that ballots rejected by Level 1 reviewers go to Level 2 reviewers, who either decide the signatures match and send the ballots through for counting or determine the signatures do not match and seek to contact the voter to confirm identity. This is called “curing.”
Olsen further said, “What that log data shows, your honor, is that over 274,000 ballots were approved at less than three seconds each. That includes one signature verifier who approved 100 percent of the 26,900 signatures that he verified at less than 3 seconds a signature.”
“Maricopa’s log file data shows that 11 of these signature verification workers approved 170,000 signatures at a rate of … between zero and 2.99 seconds with a 99.97 percent approval rating,” he said. “That’s not signature review, your honor. Simply flashing a signature on the screen, clicking a button and moving on is not signature review.”
Olsen added, “The evidence will show that Maricopa knew exactly what was going on. They could monitor each of their workers and in fact told them that they were being monitored.”
Lake’s legal team released video footage Monday of two reviewers sitting side by side while apparently verifying signatures on mail-in ballots.
Verification on the right side of the video took place at a fairly deliberate pace, with the screener taking time for the ballot image to load and seemingly reviewing it before going on to the next one.
However, on the left side of the video, it was a different story, with the man approving the ballots almost as fast as they loaded.
In a Tuesday interview on Real America’s Voice, Lake told “War Room” host Steve Bannon, “This challenge is not simply about a few bad signatures. We are prepared to show the systemic failure of the entire signature verification process — the only way we have security on those mail-in ballots, by the way. And it’s a complete joke.”
“Signature verification is one of the only methods to verify that a mail-in ballot would be authentic, and the process we have in Maricopa County is a complete sham. They’re not following the law at all,” she said.
Lake told Bannon that her legal team met with three whistleblowers “who were intimately involved in the signature verification process in Maricopa County.”
“They speak of how they were rejecting tens of thousands of signatures, up to the tune of maybe 130,000 ballots. And then somewhere above them in the chain of command, they were just being sent on through,” the Republican said.
She asserted that because of this lax verification process, hundreds of thousands of bad ballots were injected into the system.
“We’re confident that the number of fraudulent ballots exceeds the 17,000 margin separating myself and Katie Hobbs in their count of the election,” Lake said.
VoteBeat Arizona journalist Jen Fifield reported in March, based on numbers she received from the county, that in the 2022 general election, “workers marked 18,510 signatures as ‘non-matching,’ and of those, 15,411 voters confirmed it was their ballot, or ‘cured’ their ballot. That led to 3,099 rejected for bad or missing signatures. Of those, 1,299 were missing signatures and 1,800 were bad.”
A whistleblower testified in Wednesday’s trial that there was not the same sense of urgency regarding voter verification during the general election as during the primary.
She said the county turned down reviewers’ offer to cure ballots identified as having mismatched signatures.
“We didn’t understand why we were leaving early when there was ballots left in the bins. And we had asked the manager, ‘Are you sure that you wanted us to go home? Would you like us to, you know, keep trying to call these voters to get these ballots cured?’ And they said no,” the whistleblower testified.
Whistleblower: "We didn't understand why we were leaving early when there was ballots left in the bins. And we had asked the manager, "are you sure that you wanted us to go home? Would, you like us to you know, keep trying to call these voters to get these ballots cured? And they said no."
Embedded video
12:13 PM · May 17, 2023 · 641.8K Views
------------------------------------------------------
County Recorder Stephen Richer defended Maricopa’s signature review process in the 2022 election, telling Fifield some improvements had been made since 2020.
She reported that the county “increased training for workers who review signatures, increased the signatures the workers had to compare, added an audit step for approved signatures, and increased the number of people doing the work, according to a Votebeat review of county documents and data.”
They never answered whether she was victorious. Salty swore this was the case to end all cases. Dilly just provided the mountains of evidence that Lake swore was a game changer.
Surely she was victorious in the conservative stronghold of Arizona. I mean, isn’t that Tiny’s argument. In a conservative place conservatives win.
I’ll say it CONGRATULATIONS KARI on a well deserved result.
... I never claimed that THIS was "case to end all cases"
- though this was a great important one.
It's important that the voters actually SEE and UNDERSTAND
how corrupt the Democrats really are - and they continue to see.
You didn't REALLY believe that the Judge was gonna overturn
the election, did you?
He couldn't rule in Lake's favour - because there's NO WAY
they would overturn anything. ... They all just wanted to
see Lake's evidence... To make sure they don't leave
any evidence next time.
... Oh and - they didn't show "a mountain of evidence"...
There's some that Lake's people are saving.
To surely show at a later date.
