WHAT HAPPENED

[flipsalso]

I think all of us guys know most providers are in the business to make money. We all have financial obligations we must meet. And of course I need/want to know what I will owe prior to meeting. But with some providers, not all, it becomes the stated, overall reason for being in the business. I must admit it is a delicate tightrope providers must balance. Personally, I need to feel (or be fooled somewhat) into thinking we have the same main reason for meeting: lust and meeting needs. Yes, it is about both $$ and sex. But it’s all about the approach taken by the provider and which is emphasized. In short, it’s hard for me to get “in the mood” if it is strictly a financial transaction. And please Yourdesire, don’t take this the wrong way. We have never met but based on your numerous positive reviews, I am totally confident your number one priority is to ensure you and your date have a fantastic time. Just my two-cents worth.

[k3nfvn]

I understand some screening is necessary and good, and I'm fine with that if I want to see the provider. But a couple have wanted to know more about me than I know about myself, like I was going to work guarding the President. We all have certain boundaries we have decided we won't cross, and sometimes two people just can't find a happy spot in the middle.


This is certainly not personal against any provider, but some people these days are just really unstable, so it's hard to know who to trust, who will guard others lives at all cost. I respect a handful of people on this forum, and Rock is one of them. I've done enough due diligence to know I can safely believe him. So his endorsement is a good thing.


As for me, I have far too many people this could hurt, so obviously I probably shouldn't be doing this. But after a while, the need for physical human touch becomes too great. Even if it's only for a moment, and maybe even only good acting on the provider part, I still need it.


If I offended you YourDesire, I apologize.

[Guest013121]

Never say never jack cause your most recent reviews say otherwise.

Btw her post was fucking harmless and her response proves she’s just a super nice lady. I’ve seen way worse from some really desperate sounding ho’s.

[Unique_Carpenter]

And a side comment from a Kansas City guy that visits both coasts.

For starts, the gals have much more risk than the guys.

In LA & San Diego, and every where on east coast, it's now quite common for all the gals to require RW data, even with solid references.

Although gals requiring RW data (even with references) is not currently prevalent in the Midwest, it's coming and guys need to expect it.

The gals usually have multiple methods of screening, but if a guy doesn't have solid current references, that's on the guy.

BTW, I've met Desire a couple times at socials, she's quite fun to have a convo with, and her reviews clearly establish her reputation, etc.

[lrdriver]

Good thread, I am glad when providers screen to a point.
Of course, it works both ways to.

[seductrix4u]

Originally Posted by Gemma34

Never say never jack cause your most recent reviews say otherwise.

Btw her post was fucking harmless and her response proves she’s just a super nice lady. I’ve seen way worse from some really desperate sounding ho’s.

Hear, hear!

But responses like his help a companion separate the wheat from the chaff. Easily.

Ladies, say this with me. "Not all money is good money."

[yourdesire]

Rest assured & hear me loud & clear I WILL SCREEN period!!! All I'm saying is there are several ways to accomplish this. I agree 100 % not all $ is good $ and anyone who knows me will tell you I am not a $ driven person. Adventure driven yes but not $ and I'm not stupid therefore adventurous does not include being stupid & not doing the most important step in the hobby world.