Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 388
Harley Diablo 373
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 268
George Spelvin 255
sharkman29 253
Top Posters
DallasRain70546
biomed161573
Yssup Rider60189
gman4453117
LexusLover51038
WTF48267
offshoredrilling48032
pyramider46370
bambino40733
CryptKicker37134
Mokoa36487
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35624
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-08-2012, 07:19 PM   #16
MC
Valued Poster
 
MC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 14, 2010
Location: Cuse
Posts: 2,491
Encounters: 61
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grifter View Post
As to the topic of aetheist and the list of mass murders, while not all aetheist are mass murders I have to think that if you believe there is a consequence beyond this world to your actions you are less likely to kill alot of people. Just a thought.
To be fair, plenty of people throughout history have killed in the name of (a) God.
MC is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 07:25 PM   #17
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MC View Post
To be fair, plenty of people throughout history have killed in the name of (a) God.
Yet the ‘atheists’ in the 20th century managed to kill on a scale never before experienced in history.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 07:35 PM   #18
Grifter
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 22, 2010
Location: New Braunfels
Posts: 641
Encounters: 33
Default

Yes MC your right alot of people have been killed in the name of Christ, but the modern atheist really takes the cake on this point and we can argue back and forth all you like the numbers arent going to tip in your favor. Again Im not painting all atheist with the same brush but I but to be honest I would have alot less reservations on a number of fronts in life if I thought this was all there was. I always found the morality and complete disdain of evil by Christopher Hitchens particularly fascinating because he was an atheist. Thats real morale fortitude and I always admired it.
Grifter is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 08:41 PM   #19
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default Atheist intolerance.

Mao’s governmental policies led to famine that killed millions of Chinese. He is, in fact, the winner and most infamous of all killers, and he was an ‘atheist’. Runner up is the Communist regime in the USSR; also atheists. Even, Hitler’s numbers, and he didn't kill for a 'god', don't stack up against those of the ‘atheistic’ communists.

The estimates below are based on studies published by Rudolph J. Rummel, Death by Government. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 2010. pp. xxiv, 496.

His numbers—neither the highest nor the lowest available—are broken down by events. Rummel is a right wing libertarian.

Russian Civil War (1917-22): 9,000,000

Soviet Union: 61,911,000 democides in the USSR 1917-87, of which 51,755,000 occurred during the Stalin years. This divides up into:
■Russian Civil War (1917-22)
■War: 1,410,000 (includes 500,000 civilian)
■Famine: 5,000,000 (50% democidal)
■Other democide: 784,000
■Epidemics: 2,300,000
■Total: 9,494,000
■1923-29: 2,200,000 (plus 1M non-democidal famine deaths)
■1929-39: 15,785,000 (plus 2M non-democidal famine)
■1939-45: 18,157,000
■1946-54: 15,613,000 (plus 333,000 non-democidal famine)
■TOTAL: 51,755,000 democides and 3,333,000 non-demo. famine

WWII European War (military) Dead (1939-45): 28,736,000
■War-related (additional) Democides
■Hitler: 20,946,000 (including Jews: 5,291,000)
■Stalin: 13,053,000

Chinese Civil War (1945-49) Estimate:
■War Dead: 1,201,000
■Democide by Guomindang: 2,645,000
■Democide by Communists: 2,323,000
■Famine: 25,000
■TOTAL: 6,194,000

People’s Republic of China, Mao Zedong’s regime (1949-1975) Estimate:
■Democide: 34,361,000 (1949-75)
■The principle episodes being…
■All movements (1949-58): 11,813,000
■incl. Land Reform (1949-53): 4,500,000
■Cult. Rev. (1964-75): 1,613,000
■Forced Labor (1949-75): 15,000,000
■Great Leap Forward (1959-63): 5,680,000 democides
■War: 3,399,000
■Famine: 34,500,000
■Great Leap Forward: 27M famine deaths
■TOTAL: 72,260,000

Under Pol Pot, the Khmer Rouge imposed an extreme form of social engineering on Cambodian society—a radical form of agrarian communism where the whole population had to work in collective farms or forced labor projects. In terms of the number of people killed as a proportion of the population (2 million killed out of an estimated 7.1 million people), it was the most lethal regime of the 20th century. (There were an estimated, additional 35,000 foreign democides.)

•Estimates based on books by Rummel, Rudolph J.:
China's Bloody Century : Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1900 (1991), Calculates the lives lost in 20th Century China.
Lethal Politics : Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917 (1990), Does the same for the Soviet Union.
Democide : Nazi Genocide and Mass Murder (1992), The German rampage across Europe.
Death By Government (2010), The full treatment for atrocities committed worldwide during the 20th Century.

Nicolae Ceaușescu atheist leader of Romania from 1967 to 1989. Unknown thousands died each year during his reign.

Faced with a declining Romanian population in 1966, Ceaușescu issued Decree No. 770 prohibiting abortion, and contraceptives were not allowed and were not readily available. Celibacy was not an option for many Romanians, as anyone still childless over the age of 25 was required to pay a ‘celibacy tax’, a heavy burden for a population living in poverty. For seven to nine children a woman won the order of "Maternal Glory." For five or six children she was given the "Maternity Medal."

He was not motivated by concern for families or unborn children; he wanted a larger labor force.

http://caraobrien.tumblr.com/post/35...munist-romania
http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/ceausescu.html

Yeah! That is what this country needs, an atheistic candidate like Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot or Ceaușescu. They weren't 'nutcases'.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 08:59 PM   #20
IIFFOFRDB
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
Default

IB , Go back to your old avatar. Seeing ALF FUCKer Screwing Ol "whats is name" is kind of CREEPY. LOL.
IIFFOFRDB is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 09:09 PM   #21
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,955
Encounters: 15
Default

IB Hankering.

Got to disagree. While Mao certainly did his best to earn the title of most dispicable human being ever, I really think Joe Stalin has him beat. Pure evil.

And just think. "Uncle Joe" was the leader of the Soviet Union that many of the leftest in the late '40's and early '50s were so in love with.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 11:31 PM   #22
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
IB Hankering.

Got to disagree. While Mao certainly did his best to earn the title of most dispicable human being ever, I really think Joe Stalin has him beat. Pure evil.

And just think. "Uncle Joe" was the leader of the Soviet Union that many of the leftest in the late '40's and early '50s were so in love with.
Okay, Stalin wins on evil, but that little-atheist bastard Mao had a hand in killing some 75 million Chinese.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 11:36 PM   #23
IIFFOFRDB
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
Default

All right just keep pounding that "Bitch". It will work.
IIFFOFRDB is offline   Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 12:01 AM   #24
Little Stevie
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2009
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,011
Encounters: 26
Default

GP, I wonder why you bother. There are so few here who even contemplate what you have already read, evaluated and posted in an effort to educate them.

There is a saying about pearls and swine that seems fitting.


Some moron like Whirly laughs at it because it was on MSNBC - an exit poll for Rice Cake.


That is like getting mad at NBC when you lose a bet on a baseball game they broadcast.


I have to take breaks from this place. Stupid is hard to watch on a continual basis.
Little Stevie is offline   Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 06:02 AM   #25
Randy4Candy
Valued Poster
 
Randy4Candy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 30, 2009
Location: Hwy 380 Revisited
Posts: 3,333
Encounters: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy4Candy View Post
OK, TP-ers and other righties, here's the info from your own source, if one can call that "research." And as you connect the dots (you have until November 6, 2012) you will see where the argument that O'Donnell made can be made. It's a bit iffy and as with all partisan things, takes some imagination to leap to the full conclusion he made. But, there is a pretty big percentage swing.

SPOILER ALERT - I can find it for you and I won't read it to you and I sure as hell can't understand it for you.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elec...day/exit-polls
LOL! C'mon righties, no one wanna play in the arena of your own source of talking points? Talk about deafening silence. OH HELL! I forgot - this might take some effort and use of grey matter. Silly me.
Randy4Candy is offline   Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 06:48 AM   #26
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy4Candy View Post
. . . Silly me.
+1
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 07:01 AM   #27
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,955
Encounters: 15
Default

The problem with "journalist" like O'Donnell is they have sold any credibility out the window long time ago. Chris Mathews falls into the same category. I have a feeling that ole Chis has a blow up doll of the President, complete with strap on and a little electric gizmo to give him that "tingling" feeling.

Sometimes the only sane person in MSNBC's prime time is the ole Dyke Rachel. You can see a glimpse of sanity shine through every now and then, but then the programming takes over and she gets back on the party line track.

At least Rachel doesn't fantasize about sucking the Presidents dick.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 07:46 AM   #28
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

You can't take what O'Donnell says as news, it's opinion and spin. And so what if the polls say that some people have religious intolerance? What do you want to do about that? Hell, people moved here from England because of religious intolerance. The Constitution says that the government can't impose a religious test on those running for office. Citizens can, if they want to. It's wrong, but so what? The answer is education, not force.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 11:44 AM   #29
Guest050715-1
Account Disabled
 
User ID: 2746
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 7,168
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
The problem with "journalist" like O'Donnell is they have sold any credibility out the window long time ago. Chris Mathews falls into the same category. I have a feeling that ole Chis has a blow up doll of the President, complete with strap on and a little electric gizmo to give him that "tingling" feeling.

Sometimes the only sane person in MSNBC's prime time is the ole Dyke Rachel. You can see a glimpse of sanity shine through every now and then, but then the programming takes over and she gets back on the party line track.

At least Rachel doesn't fantasize about sucking the Presidents dick.
I have no idea who any of these people you mentioned are, because I don't watch TV. (I just saw Hannity for the first time on a video from this forum this week.)

But this..............

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackie S View Post
At least Rachel doesn't fantasize about sucking the Presidents dick.
...............is hi-larous. The modern media is a joke and should be portrayed as such lol.

Guest050715-1 is offline   Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 09:05 PM   #30
IIFFOFRDB
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
Default

[quote=Randy4Candy;2272898]LOL! C'mon righties, no one wanna play in the arena of your own source of talking points? Talk about deafening silence. OH HELL! I forgot - this might take some effort and use of grey matter. Silly me.[/quot

Well when you are done squating to piss. We will talk.
IIFFOFRDB is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved