Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
This trial wasn't about the sexual assault.
This judgment was for defamation. Trump is the poster child for defamation.
|
the defamation trial would never have any legs if not for that sham civil verdict of sexual assault
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tiny;1063409307[B
]Nobody knows what if anything happened at the Department Store except Carroll and Trump.[/B] But Trump and his attorneys weren’t allowed to question whether Carroll was lying at the trial. The jury had to accept with certainty that Trump raped her. Is that Orwellian or what? If I weren’t posting from a cell phone I’d link to LustyLad’s Kangaroo Court post.
|
exactly. and your point about the judge barring questioning if Carroll was lying is valid and highly questionable as a ruling. it'll be part of Trump's appeal on the sexual assault ruling.
given Carroll's known history as a serial sexual abuse accuser imo she's nothing more that a jilted slut has strong odds of being true.
oh and good dig on that Carroll article for the benefit of the membership .. i didn't read it all because i saw it some months back and read it.
for the benefit of the membership who don't like links .. here's a rather salacious paragraph
remember ... this is Carroll's
own words.
My first rich boy pulled down my underpants. My last rich boy pulled down my tights. My first rich boy — I had fixed my eyes on his face long enough to know — was beautiful, with dark gray eyes and long golden-brown hair across his forehead. I don’t know what he grew up to be. My last rich boy was blond.
He grew up to be the president of the United States.
and this is the FIRST paragraph ...
the only way she could have written even WORSE and as a 5th rate pulp FICTION romance novel is start her first paragraph with ...
"It was a dark and stormy night when Trump sexually assaulted me .."
bahahhaaaaa
Carroll shoulda plagiarized Jacqueline Susann's novels
baahhhaaaaaaa
