Cold Calling Madams

[Rudyard K]

Originally Posted by CajunGent

or perhaps a discussion over drinks and lunch/dinner.

CajunGent

Subtle CG...very subtle.

Better be careful DG. Your southern brother from another mother is trying to move in on your territory.

[discreetgent]

Originally Posted by Rudyard K

Subtle CG...very subtle.

Better be careful DG. Your southern brother from another mother is trying to move in on your territory.

Ha. I may be many things, but hopefully delusional is not one of them.

[Guest053011]

Need I remind you RK that I'm a polyamorous slut?

This territory is open for moving in on as long as I'm left with a smile on my face!



Unless, of course, I let a man collar me. I won't do a gold ring, but I'll bow to a good master. Then my body and mind are at his bidding until it's removed


()

[ForumPoster]

Originally Posted by Lauren Summerhill

Every once in a blue moon I get an email from someone claiming to be a high end madam, describing having had been a companion for many years themselves.

Always stating they have gents willing to pay shocking amounts of money, but of course they don't advertise, have no website and there's no way to verify them. But they like my look, personality and would really like to work with me.

What's all that about?

This "person" spams all local providers with this non sence:

"Hey Hun-
I know this may not be exactly what you had in mind, but if you are interested in making a small fortune this evening, if you are legititmate, and as described in your ad, I may have an opportunity for you with one of our executive vip clients.

This is a two hour dinner/date engagement booked at the rate of $1250.00 per hour..
Please forward your photos and indicate your availibility for this booking. (this is not spam hope to hear from you soon)

Very warmest regards,"

Considering "it" writes in reply to Eros ad why would they need photos?

There are so many things wrong with this e mail where to start ....

Lina

[Guest053011]

That's one of them. There are others, various names, writing styles, base locations.

I'm wondering what's behind it all, why go to the effort?

Originally Posted by Sensual Lina

This "person" spams all local providers with this non sence:

"Hey Hun-
I know this may not be exactly what you had in mind, but if you are interested in making a small fortune this evening, if you are legititmate, and as described in your ad, I may have an opportunity for you with one of our executive vip clients.

This is a two hour dinner/date engagement booked at the rate of $1250.00 per hour..
Please forward your photos and indicate your availibility for this booking. (this is not spam hope to hear from you soon)

Very warmest regards,"

Considering "it" writes in reply to Eros ad why would they need photos?

There are so many things wrong with this e mail where to start ....

Lina

[annie@christophers]

If you are making ends meet ..There are just as many men that will not put thier info in an independents hands..just a thought. And I think I am O.k'd about everwhere before most ... Annie

[Guest053011]

Originally Posted by annie@christophers

If you are making ends meet ..There are just as many men that will not put thier info in an independents hands..just a thought. And I think I am O.k'd about everwhere before most ... Annie

Yes and no.

There are those who prefer a very well reputed independent above all else.

I find there are many who wouldn't put their information in a madam's or agency's hands. Unlike them - we don't have a black books, and keep no records.

[pjorourke]

Originally Posted by Lauren Summerhill

a) There are those who prefer a very well reputed independent above all else.

b) I find there are many who wouldn't put their information in a madam's or agency's hands.

c) Unlike them - we don't have a black books, and keep no records.

a) Word!
b) Very very few would I entrust this info with.
c) Well I wouldn't go that far. Many, maybe even most, ladies do keep email and/or phone numbers. The key differences are 1) that independents are generally small targets for LE and 2) the information is not handled by multiple people.

[charlestudor2005]

Originally Posted by pjorourke

c) Well I wouldn't go that far. Many, maybe even most, ladies do keep email and/or phone numbers. The key differences are 1) that independents are generally small targets for LE and 2) the information is not handled by multiple people.

There was a well-reviewed lady who checked her records, and posted on this board that she had never seen me. From the reviews, she sees a LOT of guys, so I could only conclude that she kept records. Because her ads said to call her only if you had seen her before, I could only assume that she kept her records by phone number and handle. Probably had your phone number in her hobby phone. She may even have kept more details, like appointment dates and likes and dislikes.

Made me wonder what kind of data LE would get if she got busted.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by pjorourke

c) Well I wouldn't go that far. Many, maybe even most, ladies do keep email and/or phone numbers. The key differences are 1) that independents are generally small targets for LE and 2) the information is not handled by multiple people.

Agreed,

But at the end of the day, you never see (Elliot excluded) police making public, names of johns. Just doen not happen.

This is mostly a marketing ploy. An over inflated fear that independents exploit. This is akin to buying end of the world insurance. A waste of time.

Not that I blame them.

[Guest053011]

Agencies and madam's, when taken by LE, end up having astounding amounts of information. Credit card info, full names, phone numbers, company names, favorite girls, booking times....

All I've ever kept is the private anonymous email I write them at, and a few code words to spark my memory regarding who they are and what city they're from. Nothing remotely useful to anyone who stumbled across it.

And yes, they are a much more lusted after target for LE then indies. They've got a lot of information about women and gentlemen, much more then an indie. There's more pay off for them. And of course it's a great marketing opportunity for LE - they can hit the papers and make it seem like their doing a good job cleaning up the city while striking fear into the local industry.

Whether or not they publicly publish the names doesn't matter. They can and do contact people directly, often trying to intimidate them into giving more information then they should (which is absolutely nothing). No one wants to be on some police agency document because their name came up inrecords in the midst of a bust. Not a fun database to make.

It's really not a marketing ploy, many women have worked at agencies before becoming independent so they know first hand just how much agency owners can keep. There was a Toronto agency busted that had records going pack to the early 1980s (I have no idea WHY?! What possible value could it have?!).

Originally Posted by pjorourke

a) Word!
b) Very very few would I entrust this info with.
c) Well I wouldn't go that far. Many, maybe even most, ladies do keep email and/or phone numbers. The key differences are 1) that independents are generally small targets for LE and 2) the information is not handled by multiple people.

[Guest053011]

Originally Posted by charlestudor2005

There was a well-reviewed lady who checked her records, and posted on this board that she had never seen me. From the reviews, she sees a LOT of guys, so I could only conclude that she kept records. Because her ads said to call her only if you had seen her before, I could only assume that she kept her records by phone number and handle. Probably had your phone number in her hobby phone. She may even have kept more details, like appointment dates and likes and dislikes.

Made me wonder what kind of data LE would get if she got busted.

She actually said she checked her records? Wow. That's why men should do their research before booking any woman!

I think it's fairly easy for any women, regardless of how many she sees, to know who she hasn't been with.

I think it's pretty easy to remember people you've met on such intimate terms. Even guys who hobby a lot don't loose track of who they have and haven't seen.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Lauren Summerhill

It's really not a marketing ploy, many women have worked at agencies before becoming independent so they know first hand just how much agency owners can keep. There was a Toronto agency busted that had records going pack to the early 1980s (I have no idea WHY?! What possible value could it have?!).

Yes it is....you might not know it but it is.

It is an irrational fear.

Just as people are afraid of death from a terrorist attack, when a car wreck is far more likely.

It's like saying that you are TWICE as likely to get busted working for an agency as an independent. And failing to mention that one is one in ten million and the other one in twenty million.

An antidote from a friend of a friend does not make it so.

Originally Posted by Lauren Summerhill

I think it's fairly easy for any women, regardless of how many she sees, to know who she hasn't been with.

I think it's pretty easy to remember people you've met on such intimate terms. Even guys who hobby a lot don't loose track of who they have and haven't seen.

How do you know this?

Is this why you have these false beliefs?

You seem to think everyone does as you do. Therefore nobody keeps records except the evil agency's. Please. : /

[discreetgent]

Originally Posted by Lauren Summerhill

I think it's fairly easy for any women, regardless of how many she sees, to know who she hasn't been with.

I think it's pretty easy to remember people you've met on such intimate terms. Even guys who hobby a lot don't loose track of who they have and haven't seen.

Originally Posted by WTF

Yes it is....you might not know it but it is.
How do you know this?

Is this why you have these false beliefs?

You seem to think everyone does as you do. Therefore nobody keeps records except the evil agency's. Please. : /

Darn, Lonesome Dove has a good point about reading comprehension. What part of "I think" made it "everyone does as you do" ?

[Guest053011]

Reminds me why I stopped posting.