Shine a light on the commies

[cptjohnstone]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Same ones that are in Oklahomo no stones.

no, my elevation is only 1000 feet, you show KanASS to be 2000 feet

so by your logic North Dakota will be 10,000 feet high

[lustylad]

Keynes wrote in The Economic Consequences of the Peace: “Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”

A great quote by Keynes! Why can't economists speak and write so plainly yet eloquently today?

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by cptjohnstone

no, my elevation is only 1000 feet, you show KanASS to be 2000 feet

so by your logic North Dakota will be 10,000 feet high

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemaha_Ridge

Same height in Oklahomo as Kansas hillbilly. The Nemaha's.



http://www.kansastravel.org/mountsunflower.htm

http://www.bestoklahomatrails.com/blackmesatrail.html

They do stack shit higher in Oklahomo hillbilly.

[CuteOldGuy]

But the mountains are underground.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

But the mountains are underground.

Ekim008 aka LittleLiberalEva, doesn't seem to grasp the importance of that little detail.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

But the mountains are underground.

No shit!!! Now you are getting somewhere Tonto.

[IIFFOFRDB]

We must properly identify the commies...

http://www.usfreedomarmy.com/the-usf...he-dictionary/

The USFA takes a short visit to the Dictionary
kungfutzuRectification of Names

A superior man, in regard to what he does not know, shows a cautious reserve. If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things. If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success. When affairs cannot be carried on to success, proprieties and music do not flourish. When proprieties and music do not flourish, punishments will not be properly awarded. When punishments are not properly awarded, the people do not know how to move hand or foot. Therefore a superior man considers it necessary that the names he uses may be spoken appropriately and also that what he speaks may be carried out appropriately. What the superior man requires is just that in his words there may be nothing incorrect.

—  Confucius, Analects, Book XIII, Chapter 3, verses 4-7, translated by James Legge

————————————————————–

The USFA goes to the Dictionary to define some terms (USFA comments in parenthesis).

Communism – a: a theory advocating elimination of private property (translation: and therefore freedom) b: a system in which goods are owned in common and are available to all as needed (translation: there will soon be no goods) c: a totalitarian system of government (translation: a dictatorship) in which a single authoritarian party controls state-owned means of production.

Liberal – a: marked by generosity (translation: marked by using other people’s money to be generous) b: given or provided in a generous and openhanded way (translation: by opening someone else’s hand) c: not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms (translation: if we do not like a rule or a law we’ll just ignore it or “reinterpret” it).

Progressive – a: one believing in political change and esp. social improvement by government action (translation: a social liberal advocating big government) b: increasing in extent or severity (translation: the government gets bigger, and bigger, and bigger, … )

Socialism – a: any of various political and economic theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods (translation: the government owns everything, and that includes you) b: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property (translation: It takes a Village – the government is the village and you are the child) c: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state (translation: is this all starting to sound the same?) d: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay by work done (translation: so why work? No one else is going to).

Marx-Hegel Dialectic (not in the dictionary but here goes) – Feudalism evolves into Capitalism which evolves into Socialism which evolves into Communism and then eventually the state withers away (translation: one of the dopiest ideas ever foisted upon the human race, but there are still people who actually believe this will work).

Is all this beginning to sound the same? These are all branches of the same tree, the Tree of Collectivism. Collectivism is a system where everything you make is given to the government and the government decides how much you get back.

Fascism is a reaction from the right, socialism is a reaction from the left, but the result is always the same – dictatorship. One essential feature of both systems is massive centralized control of the government. That is why Socialism and Fascism will often seem to be the same although there are some differences.

Fascism – a political movement, philosophy, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible oppression of opposition.

Fascists do not necessarily wish to redistribute wealth or property except in the case of their political opponents or as needed in the functioning of the state. Fascists still want to retain an incentive system insofar as possible, but wish to refocus certain industries to the use of the state. Fascists are more interested in centralized control but do not necessarily wish to operate businesses and retain certain aspects of Capitalism as much as possible. Fascists strictly control the activities of their citizens, but do not necessarily need to control the means of production nor do they necessarily provide benefits to citizens who produce no labor and are a burden to the state. Fascism does not typically reward failure and punish success.

Socialism is much easier to foist upon the people. Even though you are drinking poison, the Socialists make it taste good. By rewarding all sorts of people who have essentially done nothing, Socialism appears to offer an elixir to society’s woes. Socialism has an appearance of goodness that transforms the masses into a herd of Lotus Eaters. When Barack Obama was running for president in 2008 some people often referred to him as the Pied Piper of Hamlin – he would play on his flute and the children (i.e. voters) would follow him anywhere. Now, because of our past indiscretions, we have to pay the Piper to save our children. Socialism is sweet, laden with good intentions, but like the fruit of the Tree of Collectivism it bears an ominous result.

[i'va biggen]

http://www.coldwar.org/articles/50s/...phmccarthy.asp



http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...carthy/399056/

[IIFFOFRDB]

International commies...

International Socialist Organizations

http://www.usfreedomarmy.com/interna...s-in-progress/


this post we will give you the name of a few organizations that you may have always thought were good. All of these organizations have one underlying goal that is never publically stated – a socialist world government (dominated by their membership, of course). They all have fancy websites with noble words written about their mission and importance. You may ignore those websites because we can summarize the mission of them all for everyone: “Support socialism around the world with the ultimate goal of a socialist world government.”

World Trade Organization (WTO). The World Trade Organization acts like a global government whose sole purpose is to facilitate trade and enforce international trade laws. It is a contract among member nations that severely restricts the ability of nations to direct their own trade. It was created effectively on January 1, 1995 under the Marrakech Agreement and replaced the 1948 version called General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), an outgrowth of the Bretton Woods Conference. By agreeing to the WTO, the United States effectively gave up a part of its sovereignty and, in so doing, created an organization that has proven detrimental to the economic stability of the United States. No democratic process controls what the WTO can do and it is accountable to no one. Generally, what the WTO does is attempt to redistribute wealth from the wealthier nations to the poorer ones (can you visualize a giant sucking spider?). It does this by selectively enforcing trade barriers from one country to the next to benefit the forces of socialism. China, for example, still utilizes tariffs against American companies while the U.S. is not allowed to put tariffs on Chinese products entering the U.S. The power held by the WTO is second only to the United Nations in international matters. Who were our Presidents in 1948 and 1995 that agreed to this abomination? Give us a minute and we’ll think of it.

The United Nations (U.N.) & the World Court. We all know about the mischief caused by the United Nations. We wanted to spend a few moments here and talk about a subsidiary of the U.N., the World Court (pictured). First and foremost there is no international law that supersedes the sovereignty of any individual nation. The court is therefore reduced to a primary role of offering opinions because it has no enforcement authority. As long as the World Court acts in this manner it is not a threat but there are individuals in positions of power within every sovereign country that wish to subordinate that country’s laws to the edicts of the World Court – this would be a giant step on the road to world socialism. This would mean that the U.N. members would elect judges that would determine the laws of all member countries. The World Court is a potential disaster waiting to happen and its rulings and composition must be watched carefully.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, and the Federal Reserve. This deadly troika, in combination with the U.N. and the WTO, is the lynchpin for the destruction of the U.S. economy. In 1980 Congress passed the Monetary Control Act which authorized the Federal Reserve to “monetize foreign debt.” The Fed was now authorized to create fiat money (print money out of nowhere) for the purpose of lending to foreign governments. This was an incredible act that gave the Fed the power to not only create money for the U.S. government but also for any government. The Fed became the bank of last resort for the entire world. Since the Fed cannot be audited it is unknown exactly what their involvement has been but you may rest assured it has not ignored this authority and has used it on frequent occasions to bail out failing countries. The scenario goes something like this: Country X adopts a socialist program – the socialist program fails (as usual) and Country X is on the verge of economic collapse – the liberal media and their allies tell everyone about the horrible starvation facing Country X due to a lack of rainfall (or whatever reason they drum up) – the IMF calls on the member nations to advance money so they can bail out Country X – The Fed secretly prints up some money and advances it to the IMF – the IMF “loans” the money to Country X with certain restrictions on the activities of Country X (restrictions which Country X then proceeds to ignore) and socialism in Country X is saved thanks to the biggest suckers of all – the taxpayers of the countries who sent this money to the IMF. The U.S. taxpayer in the past has bailed out numerous countries in every continent in the world except Australia (possibly) and Antarctica.

Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) & Trilateral Commission. Since these are private organizations they have a right to voice their opinions. We also have a right to expose them for what they are – agents of international socialism and promoters of world government. The earliest origins of the CFR were meetings held in New York City which included numerous allies of President Wilson as well as Colonel Edward House and Walter Lippmann (any time you get Wilson advisors and Walter Lippmann together you know where this is going). The CFR is a constant source of quotes for the liberal media who use their conclusions as if they were State Department policy. The Trilateral Commission is an outgrowth of this group founded by David Rockefeller in July 1973 to (ostensibly) foster closer cooperation among the United States, Europe, and Japan. These two groups are the primary U.S. based cheerleaders for internationalism and world government. While their methods are subtle, a close reading of their annual reports and statements of purpose reveal their interests clearly (We could give you examples stretching on for pages). Once, of course, the U.S. gives up its sovereignty they, the educated Ivy League economists and bankers, will have to control this world government so that you, the stupid and ignorant peasants, can be told how to live your worthless lives.

[i'va biggen]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/armine..._11161348.html

http://time.com/4258064/tiananmen-pr...munist-leader/

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

great guy.

too bad he didn't run for the 2nd term. I think things would have been a lot different if Hoover weren't in there.

[gary5912]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Your link bears no relevance to the post you quoted, LittleStupidEva.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH AHAHAHAHAHAHA

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAAH

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LITTLE STUPID EVA

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by gary5912

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH AHAHAHAHAHAHA

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAAH

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LITTLE STUPID EVA

You are looking good gary......

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by gary5912

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH AHAHAHAHAHAHA

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAAH

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LITTLE STUPID EVA

you need to fix your quote meme better. kinda makes you look stupid instead of eva.

[gary5912]

I See little stupid Eva had something to say but hes on ignore HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA