Slavery is making a comeback!

[thebuffmantraples]

Hey T, did you say slavery was evil at all times?yes,
I know you said this too, but here it goes, did you know slavery was evil during the Confederacy!

Also you bushy lovers. If Bush hadn't invaded Iraq and just bomb the piss out of the Hussein leadership, where would we be today?
I agree SPama won't ever be one of the top prezs ever but give it a rest! You need better argument material cause OB isn't showing your one bright B cell...

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by thebuffmantraples

Hey T, did you say slavery was evil at all times?yes,
I know you said this too, but here it goes, did you know slavery was evil during the Confederacy!

Also you bushy lovers. If Bush hadn't invaded Iraq and just bomb the piss out of the Hussein leadership, where would we be today?
I agree SPama won't ever be one of the top prezs ever but give it a rest! You need better argument material cause OB isn't showing your one bright B cell...

Did you know that your poor grammar, misspelled words and wrong word use has made your post indecipherable?

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're being a disingenuous jackass, Old-THUMPER, when you stupidly try to deflect from your post wherein you singularly highlighted and selected for remark a single four year period in history as if to infer that the horror and injustice in that four year period were on balance equal to the horror and injustice of the preceding four millennium and the subsequent 150 years: which, btw, includes the atrocities in the Belgian Congo. This is what you posted, Old-THUMPER:



Quote:
Originally Posted by Old-T
Slavery is evil today, and slavery was evil in the Confederacy, and was evil all the other times/places it was practiced.
This is what you could have posted, Old-THUMPER, you disingenuous jackass:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old-T
Slavery is evil today and was evil all the other times/places it was practiced.

Actually, no. What I DID post was:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old-T
Slavery is evil today, and slavery was evil in the Confederacy, and was evil all the other times/places it was practiced.

Notice how I highlighted much more than your beloved war of rebellion. You conveniently omit that when you selectively quoted, didn’t you? Standard IB IB practice I know, so I was not surprised.

And if we are into what a person COULD have posted, YOU could have avoided all your public embarrassment by saying something like "Slavery was morally wrong at ant time and place, including in the pre-civil war south”. But no, you have STILL refused to condemn it, so I will continue to point out that you are pro-slavery. The ball is in your court. A nice, simple, “Slavery in the South was morally wrong” will do. The problem is, I really question whether you believe it was wrong since you keep coming up with excuses (the Belgian Congo now as an excuse for why we shouldn't be too critical of slave holders in Alabama?????)—or are you just too stubborn to admit you screwed up with your blabbering about how slavery in the Confederacy wasn’t so bad because those mean nasty northerners made the kind hearted slave owners do it. It was all New York City’s fault, including—as you stated—the penniless beggar on the streets of NYC who somehow was responsible for the slaves on those southern plantations.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Did you know that your poor grammar, misspelled words and wrong word use has made your post indecipherable?

Actually, no, not indecipherable. Unless by "indecipherable" you mean "IB wants to claim he can't read this, because he would rather nit-pick the spelling/grammar rather than admit the substance is true". Typical IB.

But don't worry, I am sure you will respond with some stupid sexual or fecal comment and think you have come out ahead. That does fit your well established pattern.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The institution of slavery has been around for thousands of years, yet there are some, like Old-THUMPER, who myopically focus on only a small fraction of that history and try to pretend that slavery and all of its evils sprang into existence in 1861 and ended in 1865. Old-THUMPER's tendency to focus on small things, such as a mere four year period extracted from thousands of years or on someone's post count on a SHMB, can only lead one to believe that Old-THUMPER spends his days in a naked, lotus position staring at his own dick trying to make something more out of it than it ever was or ever will be.

Are you advocating/excusing slavery again, IBIdiot?

Are you fighting the Civil War again, IBMassa?

Why am I not surprised to see that?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Slavery is evil today, and slavery was evil in New York where it was embraced for more than 200 years, and was evil all the other times/places it was practiced.

FIFY, Old-THUMPER! Get a clue, Old-THUMPER, thebuttmantrap's post was non-substantive because it was indecipherable.

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Are you advocating/excusing slavery again, IBIdiot?

Are you fighting the Civil War again, IBMassa?

Why am I not surprised to see that?

[Old-T]

Once again, IBMassa, the pro-plantation lifestyle apologist, refuses to come out and condemn the confederacy's use of slaves. At least you are consistent.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Once again, IBMassa, the pro-plantation lifestyle apologist, refuses to come out and condemn the confederacy's use of slaves. At least you are consistent.

Typical Old-THUMPER mantra to selectively isolate a single four year period and a single geographic region for remark while stupidly turning a blind eye to Yankee complicity and the universality of the practice in question. At least Old-THUMPER is consistently stupid in his hypocrisy. BTW, Old-THUMPER your post could just as easily, and relevantly, been composed like the one below:

[Old-T]

You know, that COULD have been what I wrote, but it wasn't--was it?

Nope.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

You know, that COULD have been what I wrote, but it wasn't--was it?

Nope.

And it's precisely your choice to post what you did -- and your admission that it was deliberate -- that substantively proves it was a supercilious jab and that you are a pretentious and moronic troll, Old-THUMPER!!!!

[Old-T]

All I am doing is pointing out the uncomfortable truth about your myopia and you pro-slavery views. You are a very sick puppy.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

All I am doing is pointing out the uncomfortable truth about your myopia and you pro-slavery views. You are a very sick puppy.

The uncomfortable truth, Old-THUMPER, is that you exhibit all of the symptoms of a supercilious jackass when you morbidly and myopically fixate on a relatively short period in history in one particular region to the exclusion of all else. That you are a supercilious jackass, Old-THUMPER, is underscored by the number of times you repeatedly and superciliously inject this topic into this forum for discussion. Further, as a reminder of facts your supercilious ass would rather forget, Old-THUMPER, the amended statement below is just as pertinent as the one you chose to post:

Originally Posted by Old-T

Slavery is evil today, and slavery was evil in New York where it was embraced for more than 200 years, and was evil all the other times/places it was practiced.

[Old-T]

Go, IB, go!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Go, IB, go!

Here's another alternative version of your post that you could have posted, but didn't, Old-THUMPER. And it should again serve to remind you of facts your supercilious ass would rather forget, Old-THUMPER, and the amended statement below is just as pertinent as the one you chose to post:

Originally Posted by Old-T

Slavery was embraced in New York for more than 200 years; that's 150 years longer than it existed in Alabama.

[Old-T]

Go, IB, go!

When did NY abolish slavery? When did Alabama? Which one fought a major rebellion before they were FORCED to abolish it?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Go, IB, go!

When did NY abolish slavery? When did Alabama? Which one fought a major rebellion before they were FORCED to abolish it?

Here's another alternative version of your post that you could have posted, but didn't, Old-THUMPER. And it should again serve to remind you of facts your supercilious ass would rather forget, Old-THUMPER, and the amended statement below is just as pertinent as the one you chose to post: