Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
646 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
396 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
278 |
George Spelvin |
265 |
sharkman29 |
255 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70793 | biomed1 | 63198 | Yssup Rider | 60872 | gman44 | 53287 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48638 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 42529 | CryptKicker | 37215 | The_Waco_Kid | 36942 | Mokoa | 36496 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
06-25-2014, 11:08 AM
|
#16
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 3, 2014
Location: Your incall
Posts: 5,379
|
If rules were always enforced to the 't', there would be bans/infractions all over in every thread just about (generally speaking for message boards not just this one). Aside from the time factor, that just doesn't make for a 'good' forum. You need a bit of maliability. "... is more of what you'd call 'guidelines' than actual rules." from Pirates of the Caribbean comes to mind when thinking about this. You let people slide or bend the rules within reason up until a point. You can fall back to the letter of the law when showing why a ban period or length is warranted. Showing just how many times they actually violated a rule and leeway was given.
Should a poster with a flawless history posting a troll topic be given the same punishment as someone who's last 10 topics have been bait for trolling/conflict? While the violation may be the same, the circumstances may vary and lead to a different course of action. Should that mean parties are treated different? Maybe, maybe not. It's for the ruling body to decide what's best and how to handle situations as the arise.
All that said, the nature of the original post seems like you're wanting people to talk at you as if to be waiting for conflict rather than discuss things with you to understand each others point of view.
|
|
Quote
| 3 users liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 11:22 AM
|
#17
|
Account Disabled
|
Bridgette Black was a handle that posted right after you and your buddy last were banned last time. It was a cheap imitation of bitchtits and I tweeted about it bc I found it amusing. Not outting. It's a handle not a name.
|
|
Quote
| 3 users liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 11:38 AM
|
#18
|
Pending Age Verification
User ID: 190350
Join Date: Jun 3, 2013
Location: grapevine, Texas
Posts: 1,677
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thathottnurse
Bridgette Black was a handle that posted right after you and your buddy last were banned last time. It was a cheap imitation of bitchtits and I tweeted about it bc I found it amusing. Not outting. It's a handle not a name.
|
oh lol then nvm i feel better now thank you
it was just a weird thing
"like why in the hell is she posting about me on.... wait escorts have twitters!"
i thought you ment my name was Bridgette lol i was like WAY off
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 11:40 AM
|
#19
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 20, 2012
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,649
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfree986
Damn! that is provider #2 THN has outed (many more to come) and the morning is not over yet! This one is not hear say, as it is on THN's twitter page, but makes the previous one look more valid. Report that to the mods
|
Correct it is not hearsay but rather a twist of context, not outing. Speculating about the many mutil handle crew for sure but as i recall we all live in glass houses so continue the crusade.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 11:44 AM
|
#20
|
Pending Age Verification
User ID: 190350
Join Date: Jun 3, 2013
Location: grapevine, Texas
Posts: 1,677
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FunInDFW
If rules were always enforced to the 't', there would be bans/infractions all over in every thread just about (generally speaking for message boards not just this one). Aside from the time factor, that just doesn't make for a 'good' forum. You need a bit of maliability. "... is more of what you'd call 'guidelines' than actual rules." from Pirates of the Caribbean comes to mind when thinking about this. You let people slide or bend the rules within reason up until a point. You can fall back to the letter of the law when showing why a ban period or length is warranted. Showing just how many times they actually violated a rule and leeway was given.
Should a poster with a flawless history posting a troll topic be given the same punishment as someone who's last 10 topics have been bait for trolling/conflict? While the violation may be the same, the circumstances may vary and lead to a different course of action. Should that mean parties are treated different? Maybe, maybe not. It's for the ruling body to decide what's best and how to handle situations as the arise.
All that said, the nature of the original post seems like you're wanting people to talk at you as if to be waiting for conflict rather than discuss things with you to understand each others point of view.
|
actually i just want to know why, i seems like as long as you can et buddy buddy you become an exception to the rule
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 11:46 AM
|
#21
|
Pending Age Verification
User ID: 190350
Join Date: Jun 3, 2013
Location: grapevine, Texas
Posts: 1,677
My ECCIE Reviews
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bored@home
Correct it is not hearsay but rather a twist of context, not outing. Speculating about the many mutil handle crew for sure but as i recall we all live in glass houses so continue the crusade.
|
i had to look this phrase up lol
good job
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 11:53 AM
|
#22
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Dec 21, 2012
Location: DFW
Posts: 10,690
|
Keep in mind this is not twitter. The mods here are not the hobby police. They moderate posts here, not on twitter or any where else. The board has become much more lenient on applying the guidelines. If that is good or bad is up to you to decide.
And, David, THN does not have to out you. Everyone who cares already knows your past handles and history.
|
|
Quote
| 3 users liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 11:56 AM
|
#23
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 28, 2013
Location: D/FW metroplex
Posts: 5,753
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldButStillGoing
.....................Everyone who cares already knows your past handles and history.
|
Speaking of glass houses............
|
|
Quote
| 3 users liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 12:16 PM
|
#24
|
Lifetime Member
Join Date: Jun 6, 2012
Location: Quahog, Rhode Island
Posts: 1,685
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wulf_Princess
Now i sat back a reviewed the TOS and i now know how to word this in a way the will prove a point or two...
...
How is it that i have spotted at the thread i last posted AT LEAST 12 posts that have clearly violated at least one of the rules in the TOS and a moderator actually posted on it breaking on of the rules him self??
...
|
How do you know that no one has received any points or warnings? They are generally not made public. Only the poster and the staff know.
Worry about your own behavior.
RTM and offending posts.
Move on.
* Note, I think any infractions should be made public simply so that others see what behavior is expected of them. the "private admonishments" do little to guide the posting members behavior since they "think" others are getting away with breaking the rules.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 12:30 PM
|
#25
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 1, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,171
|
I think we need a bigger boat.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 02:14 PM
|
#26
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Apr 10, 2013
Location: fort worth tx
Posts: 624
|
Did she even make it a week before being banned this time?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 03:20 PM
|
#27
|
Registered Member
User ID: 248294
Join Date: Jun 21, 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 471
|
What did she do?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 05:17 PM
|
#28
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 10, 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 162
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Quagmire
How do you know that no one has received any points or warnings? They are generally not made public. Only the poster and the staff know.
Worry about your own behavior.
RTM and offending posts.
Move on.
* Note, I think any infractions should be made public simply so that others see what behavior is expected of them. the "private admonishments" do little to guide the posting members behavior since they "think" others are getting away with breaking the rules.
|
I think they should make multiple handles and fake review violations public information so I can judge their posts and reviews accordingly.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 06:51 PM
|
#29
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Oct 7, 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 10,648
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Your Naughty Muse
What did she do?
|
My guess is that she was banned for being an angry bat shit crazy little kid who can't remotely control her delusional self.
|
|
Quote
| 4 users liked this post
|
06-25-2014, 07:12 PM
|
#30
|
Perineum Access
Join Date: Jun 14, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,605
|
Naw!!!
It's cause the mods are picking on her...
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|