Image standards

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

What about cartoon images depicting the same? Or animals ... like a gorilla with big testicles?

Do you prefer a gorilla with small nuts?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

Do you prefer a gorilla with small nuts?

Just looking out for you, bud. I got a warning once for posting a Dennis the Menace cartoon. The mod in question said cartoon pictures of Dennis the Menace violated ECCIE guidelines.

It appears WU doesn't want to address the issue and clarify how stringent the new rules are.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Just looking out for you, bud. I got a warning once for posting a Dennis the Menace cartoon. The mod in question said cartoon pictures of Dennis the Menace violated ECCIE guidelines.

It appears WU doesn't want to address the issue and clarify how stringent the new rules are.

Sounds like they have the National Geographic standards. Topless women and naked nonfucking animals!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

Sounds like

"Sounds like" means obtuse, imprecise and vague.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

"Sounds like" means obtuse, imprecise and vague.

Well run it by me before posting....I'm having no problem understanding their desire.

[Wakeup]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Just looking out for you, bud. I got a warning once for posting a Dennis the Menace cartoon.

And what was the reason you were given for why that cartoon violated the guidelines?

P.S.-For the rest of you, this line of comment by him has nothing to do with the new image standards. Nothing to see here.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Wakeup

And what was the reason you were given for why that cartoon violated the guidelines?

P.S.-For the rest of you, this line of comment by him has nothing to do with the new image standards. Nothing to see here.

Because Dennis the Menace is a "kid" -- and there were no sexual overtones in the image.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Because Dennis the Menace is a "kid" -- and there were no sexual overtones in the image.

I told ya to run that shit by me...I'd told you that wasn't kosher.

[winn dixie]

^^^^^^^^^ So is showing monkey balls in an avatar against the new image guidelines?

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

^^^^^^^^^ So is showing monkey balls in an avatar against the new image guidelines?

in that case, RTM him! LOL! what's stopping you from it? LOL!

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

in that case, RTM him! LOL! what's stopping you from it? LOL!

Don't want to pressure wake-up! Still waiting on the depiction of muppet sex clarification. haha
Priorities.......

[WTF]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

^^^^^^^^^ So is showing monkey balls in an avatar against the new image guidelines?

Jesus...how some of you boys function in life is beyond me.

Pray do tell what is sexual about my avatar?

The owners of this site do not want any naked pics of humans between the belly button and knees. How hard is that to comply?

They do not want anything of a sexual nature...holy chit man, you can see monkey nuts at the zoo.

So I'm am going to be so bold as to say there is nothing wrong with my avatar.

Move along...

[WTF]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

Don't want to pressure wake-up! Still waiting on the depiction of muppet sex clarification. haha
Priorities.......

You can't have a pic of that.

This is really not that hard to understand. . .

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by WTF

You can't have a pic of that.

This is really not that hard to understand. . .

Muppets are not human! But sex is sex? So?

Just wtf are monkey balls used for? Monkey sex to make more monkeys!

[WTF]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

Muppets are not human! But sex is sex? So?

Just wtf are monkey balls used for? Monkey sex to make more monkeys!

Look, if you think it is in your best interest to post a picture of two Muppets fucking....have at it.

Don't say I didn't warn ya though.