WMD's Fuck-up.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Either you are willfully lying, or you are completely ignorant of the truth. Plame outed herself on the DC party scene over cocktails. Her husband's claims have since been found to be false, and Hussein had everybody and everything he needed to reconstitute his WMD program.

reconstitute? ... LMAO

yeah, thats exactly like having tons of anthrax laden chemical weapons ready to go ..

with no army, airforce, artillery, navy or anything it takes to actually deliver all that nasty stuff the Crawford Falsh said Saddam had stockpiled, how could he use them AGAINST the USA ? Shove them up a fleet of camels asses and swim them to NY harbor? We went to him and he didnt do anything but run ...

from the President down to the f'n janitor nobody was or will ever be held accountable AND everyone was ... and you twerps want to crush an AG for one fuck up and one death because its the right thing to do?

Pardon me, youre all partisan P'sOS.

to quote Tom Horn


"Thats my final word on the subject"

[joe bloe]

"Thats my final word on the subject"

Can we get you to swear that with your hand on a Bible and a notary witness?

[CuteOldGuy]

You're an idiot, CBJ7. Lies and criminality need to rooted out wherever they are. One former President's criminal act does excuse future criminal acts by other Presidents.

I thought Obama was supposed to be better than Bush II.

[Doove]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

You're an idiot, CBJ7. Lies and criminality need to rooted out wherever they are. One former President's criminal act does excuse future criminal acts by other Presidents.

What criminal act are you claiming actually occurred here?

[CuteOldGuy]

Let's release the documents and find out. Who knows, maybe Holder will come out completely clean. But I doubt it. He's already lied to the committee. What else has he lied about?

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

"Thats my final word on the subject"

Can we get you to swear that with your hand on a Bible and a notary witness?

yes, I swear I'll never mention reconstituting wmd's again

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

You're an idiot, CBJ7. Lies and criminality need to rooted out wherever they are. One former President's criminal act does excuse future criminal acts by other Presidents.

I thought Obama was supposed to be better than Bush II.

unless youre the former President

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

reconstitute? ... LMAO

yeah, thats exactly like having tons of anthrax laden chemical weapons ready to go ..

with no army, airforce, artillery, navy or anything it takes to actually deliver all that nasty stuff the Crawford Falsh said Saddam had stockpiled, how could he use them AGAINST the USA ? Shove them up a fleet of camels asses and swim them to NY harbor? We went to him and he didnt do anything but run ...

from the President down to the f'n janitor nobody was or will ever be held accountable AND everyone was ... and you twerps want to crush an AG for one fuck up and one death because its the right thing to do?

Pardon me, youre all partisan P'sOS.

to quote Tom Horn


"Thats my final word on the subject"

Your final word on the subject is unadulterated bullshit; just like your claim that Saddam had no army or air force, it is bullshit. That assertion alone demonstrates your self-inflicted ignorance. The only person that needed to held accountable was hanged: Saddam Hussein.

[CuteOldGuy]

CBJ7, you're a hopeless Obamaton, suffering from advanced liberal dementia. The only cure is to keep your hands still, mouth shut, and avoid polling places. And a healthy dose of reality therapy. Good luck!

[Doove]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Let's release the documents and find out. Who knows, maybe Holder will come out completely clean. But I doubt it. He's already lied to the committee. What else has he lied about?

So let me see if i've got this straight. You're in favor of spending federal dollars on an investigation. An investigation, not into a crime, but into whether or not a crime was even committed? Whereby you can't even enunciate what that supposed crime being investigated even is?

I guess it should be asked; what's your opinion on using government power to tyrannize those with whom you disagree with politically?

I would think a libertarian would be against exactly this sort of fishing expedition.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Doove

So let me see if i've got this straight. You're in favor of spending federal dollars on an investigation. An investigation, not into a crime, but into whether or not a crime was even committed? Whereby you can't even enunciate what that supposed crime being investigated even is?

I guess it should be asked; what's your opinion on using government power to tyrannize those with whom you disagree with politically?

You are multiply wrong Doofus!!! CrimeS (plural) were committed -- that's a known fact.

[Doove]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You are multiply wrong Doofus!!! CrimeS (plural) were committed -- that's a known fact.

Then perhaps you can clue me and COG in on which one(s).

[CuteOldGuy]

Perjury

[Doove]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Perjury

So you came up with that between post #20 and......when, exactly?

[CuteOldGuy]

You have to pay attention. It's been asked and answered several times.