Quote:
Originally Posted by ninasastri
I was discussing this with a client/friend of mine yesterday, that in the USA even if your semen gets stolen after a BJ and the woman impregnates herself voluntarily without the males knowledge, you have to pay custody for a child, because the interests of the child are more important then the interests of the betrayed father
Is this true?
|
As other have said, the answer is yes, and it is worse than that. In the past, before DNA testing, all a woman had to do was name the man, and he had to pay child support. This nonsense where by the government decided it had a right to take money from a person who was essentially a sperm donor has only been going on since the 80s though. To me, this law, as much as any other, has been part of the downfall in societal morality. This stupid law makes paternalism optional in child rearing, and every study shows how important fathers are to a child's development.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninasastri
Understood. But - given the woman`s conduct which is highly unethical and in my opinion is considered psychological rape - would you want a child to be rised by a lunatic? I wouldn`t
|
Exactly. That is the part where the court falls on its face. If the courts really cared about what was best for the child, they wouldn't leave said child in the hands of a calculating, manipulative lying bitch. Men have no say on whether a child is born, little say on how the child is raised, and the court could give a rat's ass about how men feel after being lied to. The courts look at men as sperm donors and ATMs. Given that women have the choice about whether to have an abortion or not, IMO men, who father children out of wedlock, should have the choice on whether or not they want to support a child. This law cheapens marriage.
This past weekend, one of my sugar babies went to a casino and blew a lot of money and came crying to me for more. I said that I wasn't going to give her much given what she did, but she then told me, "Don't worry, baby! That wasn't your money. It was my child support."
Can you imagine being the father in that situation? How hard are you going to work to get ahead when the state steals 25% or more of your paycheck to support a woman who pulls a stunt like this? The economic effect is devastating, and it gives incentive to men not to work. And believe it or not, my SB is actually one of the more honorable women I know. Others are even worse.
I think it also shows you how hypocritical our society is with regards to prostitution. One of the lines used with this law is, "If you want to play, you have to be ready to pay." But OTOH, our same society says it is illegal to pay for sex.
When you watch television, look at what types of shows you see lawyers advertise on: Oprah, Maury, soap operas ETC. You will never see a lawyer advertise during a football game. Lawyers are clearly aiming for a female audience. Basically, our entire civil legal system is designed for ways for women to take money from men.
Men aren't angels. They lie, exaggerate, rape, cheat ETC. The difference is the law and society break men's balls when they do act badly.
For me, the best thing about the hobby is that you leave all that behind. It is just a man and a woman helping each other out, and the government is nowhere to be seen. That is one reason I don't want the hobby to ever be legal. The one thing the government would do for sure is to come in and screw it up.
