Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70796
biomed163347
Yssup Rider61056
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48691
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42817
CryptKicker37223
The_Waco_Kid37180
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-04-2013, 11:20 PM   #16
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default

It was understood from the beginning that the only way Obama Care could really work was if everybody was in it.

The more people that the Administration allows to opt out of the system, the more it will cost those that are required to be in it.

That cannot be a good thing.
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 11:33 PM   #17
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,056
Encounters: 67
Default

Are you suggesting that the government won't enforce the business mandate in 2015?
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 05:48 AM   #18
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex View Post
I suspect it will have a negative effect on the incentive that larger company's might have to hire new employee's due to the year delay.
Perhaps, but there is even a worse result as far as the alleged "purpose" of the law, which IS immediate. The law became law in March 2010.

#1: Everyone, including employers and insurers have had AT LEAST 3 plus years to "decide" what to do.

#2: "The Secretary" has had 3 years to promulgate implementing regulations.

#3: People have been hired and as is customary they wait for a period before they get health insurance from the company ... 30-180 days.

#4: Open enrollment was to begin October 1st so companies have been telling new employees they are eligible for insurance and can enroll by October 1st.

#5. Carriers are saying they cannot offer employee group plans for 2014 until The Secretary has completed promulgating the regulations to let them know what they HAVE TO OFFER for employer plans, and they WERE planning on those regs to be in place in time for them to provide employers with "OPTIONS" for their employees ....

#6. Carriers need to have their Plan Option coverages so they can allow "underwriting" to establish a rate that can be charged for particular plans and supplemental components to those plans.

#7. AND if employers begin coverage for employees prior to Jan. 1, 2014, then the carriers have to either begin the REQUIRED coverage now or let employers know that the plans offered in 2013 cannot (will not) be offered effective Jan. 1st 2014, and/or the premiums on the existing plans will be going up substantially for 2014 ..

#8. AND all that was to be in place by October 1st 2013, so the employers/employees could make their decision according to the requirements of the law/regulations (that do not exist at this time).

Is the decision "political" ... because of the upcoming elections. Of course. Because EVERYONE of the dumbshits who voted FOR Obamacare AND who are still saying it is a good deal and beneficial for the country are AT RISK of getting booted out ... IF THE VOTERS find out how they are going to be fucked come January 1, 2014. Pushing it off past mid-terms may save their asses.

This delay ONLY GIVES non-union major companies a reprieve at PROVIDING health insurance for the newly hires who finally got a job and those hired in the next year, who finally got a job, whose COBRA has expired, and are no longer insured. The carriers are CURRENTLY NOT REQUIRED to accept their applications, and if they do it ONLY WILL BE for high risk plans at high risk rates. (What will become known as "the pool")

So the 11 million UNINSURED, the plan was supposed to "COVER" WTIH INSURANCE, will NOW INCREASE to 30 to 40 million at least, ... SO LONG AS THEY ARE NON-UNION, NON-GOVERNMENT, and/or are working for an EXEMPTED EMPLOYER, because The Secretary has been busy passing out EXEMPTIONS to Obaminable supporters (groups) RATHER than spending HER time establishing the regulations.

Like Nancy and Harry told EVERYONE ... pass it and then see what happens.

That's the reason by the original implementation date was AFTER 2nd term elections AND that is reason why the administration is trying to kick the can down the road.

Guess who gets the mess! The next guys.

Just like Obaminable did in the Chicago housing project he was "organizing"! Left it UNFINISHED!
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 05:56 AM   #19
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
Are you suggesting that the government won't enforce the business mandate in 2015?

YES! Because of the upcoming 2016 elections!

With about 2,500 EXEMPTIONS, what "mandates"?

Besides .. if I have to pay $250 a month for each employee as my part of the NEW RATES, which amounts to $3,000 annually, I am going to pay my $750 a year TAX BULLET per employee to NOT OFFER COVERAGE and save $2,250 a year per employee by NOT OFFERING COVERAGE.

Then if the employee doesn't want to pay $6,000 a year in premiums for health insurance the employee can pay $750 a year for the TAX BULLET and SAVE $5,250 a year out of pocket!

That is ASSUMING that the carriers HOLD premiums for the "average" plan at $500 a month!

So what good is a law that was supposedly designed to insure 11 million people ... if it generates 30, 40, to 50 million uninsured! ..... It generates TAXES .. from businesses AND the MIDDLE CLASS.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 07:43 AM   #20
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,056
Encounters: 67
Default

Interesting way of looking at it.

People's natural resistance to health care coverage was all a plot to raise money for Obama's treasury.

I can smell the next great bitching point coming.

Pity people occasionally get sick, isn't it?
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 09:20 AM   #21
CJOHN
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 22, 2012
Location: -
Posts: 486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
Perhaps, but there is even a worse result as far as the alleged "purpose" of the law, which IS immediate. The law became law in March 2010.

#1: Everyone, including employers and insurers have had AT LEAST 3 plus years to "decide" what to do.

#2: "The Secretary" has had 3 years to promulgate implementing regulations.

#3: People have been hired and as is customary they wait for a period before they get health insurance from the company ... 30-180 days.

#4: Open enrollment was to begin October 1st so companies have been telling new employees they are eligible for insurance and can enroll by October 1st.

#5. Carriers are saying they cannot offer employee group plans for 2014 until The Secretary has completed promulgating the regulations to let them know what they HAVE TO OFFER for employer plans, and they WERE planning on those regs to be in place in time for them to provide employers with "OPTIONS" for their employees ....

#6. Carriers need to have their Plan Option coverages so they can allow "underwriting" to establish a rate that can be charged for particular plans and supplemental components to those plans.

#7. AND if employers begin coverage for employees prior to Jan. 1, 2014, then the carriers have to either begin the REQUIRED coverage now or let employers know that the plans offered in 2013 cannot (will not) be offered effective Jan. 1st 2014, and/or the premiums on the existing plans will be going up substantially for 2014 ..

#8. AND all that was to be in place by October 1st 2013, so the employers/employees could make their decision according to the requirements of the law/regulations (that do not exist at this time).

Is the decision "political" ... because of the upcoming elections. Of course. Because EVERYONE of the dumbshits who voted FOR Obamacare AND who are still saying it is a good deal and beneficial for the country are AT RISK of getting booted out ... IF THE VOTERS find out how they are going to be fucked come January 1, 2014. Pushing it off past mid-terms may save their asses.

This delay ONLY GIVES non-union major companies a reprieve at PROVIDING health insurance for the newly hires who finally got a job and those hired in the next year, who finally got a job, whose COBRA has expired, and are no longer insured. The carriers are CURRENTLY NOT REQUIRED to accept their applications, and if they do it ONLY WILL BE for high risk plans at high risk rates. (What will become known as "the pool")

So the 11 million UNINSURED, the plan was supposed to "COVER" WTIH INSURANCE, will NOW INCREASE to 30 to 40 million at least, ... SO LONG AS THEY ARE NON-UNION, NON-GOVERNMENT, and/or are working for an EXEMPTED EMPLOYER, because The Secretary has been busy passing out EXEMPTIONS to Obaminable supporters (groups) RATHER than spending HER time establishing the regulations.

Like Nancy and Harry told EVERYONE ... pass it and then see what happens.

That's the reason by the original implementation date was AFTER 2nd term elections AND that is reason why the administration is trying to kick the can down the road.

Guess who gets the mess! The next guys.

Just like Obaminable did in the Chicago housing project he was "organizing"! Left it UNFINISHED!
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
YES! Because of the upcoming 2016 elections!

With about 2,500 EXEMPTIONS, what "mandates"?

Besides .. if I have to pay $250 a month for each employee as my part of the NEW RATES, which amounts to $3,000 annually, I am going to pay my $750 a year TAX BULLET per employee to NOT OFFER COVERAGE and save $2,250 a year per employee by NOT OFFERING COVERAGE.

Then if the employee doesn't want to pay $6,000 a year in premiums for health insurance the employee can pay $750 a year for the TAX BULLET and SAVE $5,250 a year out of pocket!

That is ASSUMING that the carriers HOLD premiums for the "average" plan at $500 a month!

So what good is a law that was supposedly designed to insure 11 million people ... if it generates 30, 40, to 50 million uninsured! ..... It generates TAXES .. from businesses AND the MIDDLE CLASS.
For an ambulaxxx lawyer chaser, do you think you qualify too write about this!

WHO THE FUCK BROKE INTO MY VEHICAL AND CHANGE THE PASSWORD TOO MY MAC PRO BOOT START? WAS THAT YOU " FUCK YOU" WHO "FUCK YOU" THAT YOU
CJOHN is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 09:56 AM   #22
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJOHN View Post
For an ambulaxxx lawyer chaser, do you think you qualify too write about this!
If I were one, then I wouldn't be qualified to write about it, at least on that basis alone.

Were the noisy fireworks stressful to you last night?
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 09:59 AM   #23
CJOHN
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 22, 2012
Location: -
Posts: 486
Default

maybe you are a little more qualify, since your employer uses the services ... lol
CJOHN is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 11:07 AM   #24
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

almost 98% of the businesses in this country have less than 50 employees ... small businesses qualify for subsidies to offset the cost ... if Wallyworld and Mickey D's doesn't want to get with the program, fuckem, they have enough $ to pay the $3k fine for every employee that purchases their own insurance
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 11:22 AM   #25
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ7 View Post
almost 98% of the businesses in this country have less than 50 employees ... small businesses qualify for subsidies to offset the cost ... if Wallyworld and Mickey D's doesn't want to get with the program, fuckem, they have enough $ to pay the $3k fine for every employee that purchases their own insurance

the number of employees doesn't matter for Obaminable Care ...

........... it is based on gross revenues of the company, not the number of employees.

Read the fine print. What the hell do you think the IRS was supposed to be doing?

Examining the books, assessing responsibility, evaluating compliance, and then taxing!
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 11:24 AM   #26
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJOHN View Post
since your employer uses the services ... lol
Are you addressing me?
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 11:33 AM   #27
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

since the businesses with less than 50 employees are exempt from the mandate and businesses with more than 50 employees aren't, looks like youre going to have to post that FINE PRINT just for CJOHN
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 12:09 PM   #28
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

Individual's are exempt from the mandate............

Obama is caving into big business interests because he needs their donations for the 2014 election cycle.
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 12:16 PM   #29
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
Individual's are exempt from the mandate............

Obama is caving into big business interests because he needs their donations for the 2014 election cycle.

I bet you can provide a list of big businesses that donate more $$ to the dems than they do the repubs cant you ?

ready set GO !
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 02:11 PM   #30
bojulay
Valued Poster
 
bojulay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 30, 2011
Location: I can see FTW from here
Posts: 5,611
Encounters: 8
Default

The Law, more like a set of guidelines than rules not to be broken.

Another product of big government, the suspension of whatever laws
they don't feel like enforcing at the moment.

Parlay, Captain Jack.
bojulay is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved