Trump was convicted by a supporter

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Diligaf

It only takes ONE juror to hang a jury. Juror #2 answered that Trump’s Truth Social was their only source of news and not even THAT person voted Not Guilty on even ONE charge.

Please save your rigged/sham/kangaroo takes for your echo-chamber friends & donors.

https://x.com/RyanSilvey/status/1796294029921108335

Those weren't 12 liberal jurors. Apparently the evidence was overwhelming. Grand Juries in red states (looking at you FL) voted to indict him on the classified documents charges.

So where is all the madness about rigged coming from?

Another benefit: Felons aren't allowed to travel to several European countries around the world, so notwithstanding the POTUS thing, I think he may have played his last round in Scotland.

your "proof" is a twittyXbird post?


BAHHAHHAAAAA


this shows is how desperate you are to believe Trump is guilty.

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

your "proof" is a twittyXbird post?


BAHHAHHAAAAA


this shows is how desperate you are to believe Trump is guilty.

Oh Trump is guilty of a lot more than falsifying business records. He will eventually be held accountable for the crimes he committed. The baby is a felon and he has racked up quite the negative karma over his life time. He will eventually get what’s coming his way and I don’t believe that includes a second term in office.

[rooster]

I was sloppy and might have confused a few who thunck I wuz after Yssup. My apologies, and tain't the case. FAR from it. It's the Trump idolater I'm callin out....cuz I'm jealous he didn't make one a them kewl avatars fer me...

Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

Those are actually called facts, each and every one A-N-D I adroitly avoided labeling her a J.A.P because, well, errrr, uhmmm... I dunno - courtesy and manners perhaps. Shoot howdy, where are my Frick'n manners anyway?!? That word may be new for you. Lemme help you out there (with a little help from the good folks at American Heritage:I suspect facts are, in fact, gluten free and low in carbs. Try them, who knows, you might like them

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Not facts. Dog whistles. Trope. Hate speech.

Seems like you’re on quite a roll WYID.

What’s next?

Originally Posted by rooster

Unfortunately, the answer is...more o' the same from him.

You called it before: dog whistles, trope, tripe. Sprinkle in some vague techincal and legal references to look 'specially hip and kewl. Light racism. Don't ferget the whitty use of terms of "endearment" like "matey" (and "lads!").

Oh!! But he has a new Avatar! Dija see? Whatta rebel! Maybe he even has that actual mask, next to his Golden Sneakers and Trump trading cards. His mom keeps them all dusted nicely..

It kinda takes one ta know one, I suppose. Cuz plenty of cucks on here could accuse me of similar things. But still....there ain't nuthin worse than smarmy folk who repeat the lies that we all know are lies, gaslighting us about every goddam thing they got time ta look at....

Codswallop!

(too bad we can't figger out how to make us some kinda "script" or sumthin to respond to alla his posts with "if you say so.." ... I mean..it works fer alla them other fools like Wacko kid..)

.

That should be more clear now. Yer welcome.

.

[rooster]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

It might distress you to know that I haven’t reported a single instance of your racist trope and dog whistles.

I’m sure I’m not the only one offended by your racist bullshit.

Please see post #18 above. And your PM's. And everything else I've ever posted.

Sorry fer the confusion...(maybe it's just that your sense of humor is better than mine)

.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Oh Trump is guilty of a lot more than falsifying business records. He will eventually be held accountable for the crimes he committed. The baby is a felon and he has racked up quite the negative karma over his life time. He will eventually get what’s coming his way and I don’t believe that includes a second term in office.

if you say so

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by rooster

Please see post #18 above. And your PM's. And everything else I've ever posted.

Sorry fer the confusion...(maybe it's just that your sense of humor is better than mine)

.

Hey Rooster, I think Yssup was referring to WYID, not you.

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Not facts. Dog whistles. Trope. Hate speech.

Seems like you’re on quite a roll WYID.

What’s next?

Yssup, I believe you're being a bit hard on WYID. If you look into the origin of calling a spade a spade, you'll see it doesn't have anything to do with race. I've always aspired to bang a Jewish American Princess, ever since my two Jewish roommates, members of ZBT, trotted them around our apartment. What WYID said about Debbie Wasserman Schultz was just plain ridiculous. She's not a Jewish American Princess. She's ugly. Finally, as to "Cubana Mammies," that's not racist either, it's just really bad Spanish. Many a young Cuban woman has called me Papi, and I never took that as an insult about my age. When I've called my dates "Mamacita," none have taken offense either.

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by rooster

Please see post #18 above. And your PM's. And everything else I've ever posted.

Sorry fer the confusion...(maybe it's just that your sense of humor is better than mine)

.

Can't speak for yssup. But it's clear he's responding to wyid. Yssup prolly meant to quote that post above yours by wyid .

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by rooster

Please see post #18 above. And your PM's. And everything else I've ever posted.

Sorry fer the confusion...(maybe it's just that your sense of humor is better than mine)

.

I was responding to WYID. Trust me bro, we’re on the same side here.

I suppose I was being lazy by not including the quote I’m responding to, but that would mean having to read that drivel again.

No harm, no foul. No offense taken.

[eccieuser9500]

Does anyone know where to get and post the prosecution's closing arguments? I bet that's what convinced the juror.

Honestly, I really don't believe there were any of his supporters on the jury. GOPers sure. Not Dumpster backers.

Anyway, I'll see what a quick Googley results.

[eccieuser9500]

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/05...nt-trump-trial

The prosecutor, Joshua Steinglass, argued that 20 witnesses called to the stand and evidence presented during six weeks of testimony had shown that Mr. Trump was guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The charges stem from his repayment, made on the eve of the 2016 election, of hush money that silenced a porn star’s account of a sexual encounter a decade earlier.

I want the transcript.