I looked up Steven Ertelt, one of your prominently listed "sources" for the "third side" to every story. He's a righty-tighty Catholic neocon and hardly a pillar of the rational community. He pimps the usual radical Pro-Life agenda on his publication "Life News." The linked article below is the typical parsing of the methodology of the study he attempts to refute. The short-bus version of it, for you TP-ers, is that he contends that study is flawed because it doesn't take into account Catholic women who don't use birth control because their situations preclude its necessity. Now, you TP-ers may want to read that last sentence 10-12 times since it is has more than five words. Anyway, I suppose studying people using birth control who are actually in a situation where it may be a useful option doesn't pass his litmus test.
Glenna, I bit on this for a minimal amount of time (15 minutes, max) - that's all you get. Let's just say that your overwrought list is populated with "sources" that after a careful reading of the content and cross checking a couple of things once again shows that there's no there there, as usual.
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/02/13/f...trol-debunked/
