NOT A GOOD MORNING FOR HILLARY !!!!!

[tttalinky]

[Guest040616]

Hmmm, it appears that the usual set of 47 percenters will not be voting for Hillary in 2016 (It should be noted that by 2016 it will probably be 42 percenters). Thus far, WhirlyTurd, Joe the Bloehard, I B Lying & Crying, LL, as well as the leaseholder of the luxurious Penthouse Suite of Houston's dozen or so Palace Inns have all stepped forward.. I ASSume StupidOldLyingFart, Turdyfly and J D the Custodian will also be taking their rightful place on center stage with their fellow LOSERS.

Anyone else care to step forward?

HILLARY 2016!!!!!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bigtex

Anyone else among the Losers?

I think I better mark this post down as a prediction for:

1. OverTheHillary will be a candidate in November 2016; and
2. OverTheHillary will win the General Election in November 2016.

Right now, and for the last few months, OverTheHillary has been, and is,....

.... making TV spots for her opponents, both Parties, for any future campaign.

"The Buck Stops Here," but I am going to move my chair over one notch."

"It was the head injury."

"Well, I answered the phone at 8 a.m. What the hell you want?"

I was dodging sniper fire on the tarmac in Europe, while you were ......"

[Whirlaway]

She couldn't win her own party's nomination.....what makes you think she could a national election ?

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

She couldn't win her own party's nomination.....what makes you think she could a national election ?

Written by the same blithering idiot who boldly (and repeatedly) predicted that Wisconsin and America was "Trending" Romney in 2012.

So much for WhirlyTurd's credibility (or lack thereof)!

[CuteOldGuy]

Why would I vote for anyone who prefers government control over individual freedom and responsibility? Hillary supports a strong, invasive government. I will not vote for her. I prefer freedom.

[I B Hankering]

So BigKoTex pulled his stinky pinky out of his buddy’s ass to type some more incredibly stupid remarks.



Face reality, BigKoTex -- Joe "The Clown" is your dupe for 2016!

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=652891

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Why would I vote for anyone who prefers government control over individual freedom and responsibility? Hillary supports a strong, invasive government. I will not vote for her. I prefer freedom.

There you have it folks, Ron Paul (who is now quickly approaching 104 years of age), has another 2016 voter!

[Whirlaway]

BigJerk; I just asked the question.......

Geez, you are in so in love with Hillary you can't even stand someone asking you a question about her prospects ....................

I'll ask again (because I know it upsets you). What makes you think Hillary can win a national election when her own Democratic party wouldn't give her the nomination ?

Originally Posted by bigtex

Written by the same blithering idiot who boldly (and repeatedly) predicted that Wisconsin and America was "Trending" Romney in 2012.

So much for WhirlyTurd's credibility (or lack thereof)!

You obviously don't know what "trending" means.......do you ?

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by bigtex

There you have it folks, Ron Paul (who is now quickly approaching 104 years of age), has another 2016 voter!

A senile Ron Paul would be better than anyone the major parties would run. However, I expect Gary Johnson to run again. Unless something changes, I expect to be supporting him again.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

You obviously don't know what "trending" means.......do you ?

WhirlyTurd, just follow the link to my September 13, 2012 "Trending" prediction!

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...9&postcount=69

[timpage]

Whirly, your predictions regarding presidential politics don't inspire given your track record of being blatantly, ridiculously, outrageously and quite recently, wrong.

I think you know that Hillary is quite capable of winning both her party's nomination and the Presidency. I do tend to think she might be a bit too old in 2016 but maybe not.

Given the the presidential political wilderness that the GOP is currently cluelessly roaming around in, and their apparent utter inability to figure out an exit strategy to get back into the national game, I give her much better than even odds of beating any GOP nominee in 2016. Who can beat her? Rand Paul? Rick Perry? You're going to say Marco Rubio, aren't you?

Now....why do you think she can't win? And, let's restrict your answer to the Dem primary contest lest you be swept away with unwarranted republican optimism.

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

BigJerk; I just asked the question.......

Geez, you are in so in love with Hillary you can't even stand someone asking you a question about her prospects ....................

I'll ask again (because I know it upsets you). What makes you think Hillary can win a national election when her own Democratic party wouldn't give her the nomination ?




You obviously don't know what "trending" means.......do you ?

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

A senile Ron Paul would be better than anyone the major parties would run. However, I expect Gary Johnson to run again. Unless something changes, I expect to be supporting him again.

Yet another LOSER in the Ron Paul mold. That is a very convenient choice for a perennial fence sitter who only wants to bitch and moan about every winning candidate.

[timpage]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

A senile Ron Paul would be better than anyone the major parties would run. However, I expect Gary Johnson to run again. Unless something changes, I expect to be supporting him again.

Yeah, Gary Johnson....still looking for a job.

Maybe he can put together a ground game this time that at least manages to get him on the ballot in every state. Be a big plus for him if he could look at least that competent.

[Whirlaway]

BigJerk; you have proven many times you don't know or understand the meaning of "trending"..........

So keep posting away like the spastic moron that you are.....it makes you look silly.