Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
It is far too easy to generalize Buchanan as an uninspired, uninteresting, and unmotivated politician whose presidency is best glossed over to make way for Lincoln’s. Rather, the Buchanan presented was a dynamic politician with goals and aspirations that, admittedly, fell very flat. One such goal was his jingoistic intentions towards Cuba and the Caribbean, fueled by a ‘might makes right’ philosophy that he clung to after witnessing the unifying effect of a martial spirit of nationalism during the Mexican-American War, even as expansionism fell out of favor. Another goal was to centralize the Democrats’ policy and leadership behind him—even if it meant feuding with other leading Democrats such as Stephen Douglas. In an age of notorious party volubility, it isn’t a surprise that Buchanan failed, though his failure was not for lack of
effort.
Further, Buchanan remains a personally complex and interesting figure. To this day, Buchanan remains the nation’s only bachelor president, highly anomalous for his era, which has led to persistent historical rumors that he was homosexual. Buchanan friendly relationships with women was notably positive, however, in an otherwise repressed era. These included a close friendship with future Confederate First Lady Varina Davis, whose own relationship with her
husband was often strained by his dominating personality.
20 posts in 20 minutes. An admirable accomplishment, oeb11, and yet another reason why you alone resurrected the DOTY designation during the worst year on record in our lives.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Keep it up. You’ll get that all expenses paid trip to fake ID land before you know it!
How bout the ignorant in chief "trying" to demand his appointed one's to fulfill his stupid orders? Putin is laughing his ass off on his stupid appointee
How are your demands working out for you? Just like a toddler. Demanding, tantrum throwing, immature... yeah you are definitely a liberal.
'Rule of law' and equality for all do not exist under the radical marxist DDPST narrative
as ts demanded " I demand that 'You" arrest them all" - referring to anti DPST's - just for their opinion.
Typical of what we will see - joey and hoey refuse to anser questions to the people about their stands on issue s- just as DPST's here. And Who tf is the 'You" in ts mind responsible for carrying out illegal arrests????They want their Rule of narrative imposed on all - at their express pleasure - and Damn the constitution and equality under the Law for all.
They will run our streets red with the blood of rule of law supporters if elected.
Once again, you show us you are really praying for some violence. Take a pill!
Praying for something and recognizing the reality of the situation are two different things.
Liberals don't understand that they are standing in a powder-keg flipping matches. At one point the Supreme Court was more Conservative and became more liberal. Did Conservatives riot in the streets then? Did we say that the govt. is illegitimate?
No. We followed the laws, regardless of how much we think they are immoral (ie. abortion)
Now that the pendulum is going the other direction, it's all about the threats. Elections have consequences.
You want to control SCOTUS nominations and confirmations, you have to win elections. If your solution is to short circuit the electoral process, then you're going to experience push back in the form of bullets.
Conservatives are being banned from the soapbox, we won at the ballot box. If that is undone through extra-legislative activity (new states, packing the court etc), then we shall have no alternative but the ammo box.
Biden just said what the Republicans are doing with Barrett is un-constitutional. Has CNN, MSDNC corrected that false remark? Has Facebook or Twitter taken that down from their left wing propaganda sites?
"We've never had a precedent like this before the left is yelling". Well, that's kinda how a precedent works! FOR THE FIRST TIME. Because something has never been done before like changing Senate rules to throw out the filibuster rules on lower court judges as Harry Reid did setting a precedent, doesn't mean it is illegal or un-constitutional.
So we can blame ole Harry for starting us down this road of precedents. As long as it is constitutional and it is Joe whether you know and understand it or not, it's legal.
I imagine if Democrats win the White House and Senate, we are going to have "precedents" out the ass for at least 2 years.
