Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70796
biomed163334
Yssup Rider61040
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48679
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42781
CryptKicker37223
The_Waco_Kid37138
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-29-2011, 10:33 PM   #16
Munchmasterman
Valued Poster
 
Munchmasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGiz View Post
Are you actually attempting to obfuscate the blatantly obvious left bias of the New York Times? The bias of their book reviews? There is no such thing as an unbiased book review. Reporting news!!!! Book Reviews!!!!! Learn the fucking difference.* Are you denying it?

THAT... was pretty much, the OP's point.

Attempting to cover it up with AOL polls taken in Mississippi does not impress anyone! I can make a poll's results say anything I want it to. So what?
You can? Then make those numbers say something else. Slan the real numbers any way you want.

Get on it. Now.
Munchmasterman is offline   Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 10:37 PM   #17
MrGiz
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 11,947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman View Post


Some feel giving an example of being racist is an attempt at getting a racist reaction out of the closet racists.





Looks like it worked again.





He'll have you trying every possible combination of words and ideas to get your point across and thus divert you from ever getting an answer out of him.





The "I know you are but what am I?" strategy. He will never directly answer your question or acknowledge you have a valid point.

Cause he's just sayin'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman View Post
You can? Then make those numbers say something else. Slan the real numbers any way you want.

Get on it. Now.
I gave a one word answer... did it escape you?

Thank You, for your assistance, Munch. . . as usual... you've done a fine job!
MrGiz is offline   Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 11:34 PM   #18
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

I'd like to see a poll by a reputable polling company before deciding that 46% of the people in Mississippi are racist. Also, while opposing interracial marriage certainly has racist roots, it's not the same as lynching or burning crosses. In fact, (tongue in cheek) 46% might indicate a trend toward tolerance among Mississippians. Just sayin'.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 11:58 PM   #19
TexTushHog
Professional Tush Hog.
 
TexTushHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 8,959
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGiz View Post
Are you actually attempting to obfuscate the blatantly obvious left bias of the New York Times? * Are you denying it?
Absolutely I deny it. This is the newspaper that all but sucked George Bush and Dick Cheney's dicks during the war in Iraq. Through the now widely discredited reporting of Judith Miller and Michael Gordon they became nothing more than mouthpieces for government propaganda. They just repeated any lie that the administration wanted them to tell. All for a little access to supposedly "inside" information -- all of which was nothing but lies.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/may/29/iraq.usa1

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...at_melted.html

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/media/features/9226/

Likewise, they ignored the Bush administration running up budgets that had they occurred in a Democratic administration under similar circumstances, would have elicited howls of outrage.
TexTushHog is offline   Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 12:02 AM   #20
Munchmasterman
Valued Poster
 
Munchmasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGiz View Post
I gave a one word answer... did it escape you?

Thank You, for your assistance, Munch. . . as usual... you've done a fine job!
You said nothing...as usual.

And dodged,........as usual, not knowing the difference between book reports and AP reports.

And no thanks needed. Anyone could refute you with equal ease.
Munchmasterman is offline   Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 12:04 AM   #21
TexTushHog
Professional Tush Hog.
 
TexTushHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 8,959
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGiz View Post
Attempting to cover it up with AOL polls taken in Mississippi does not impress anyone! I can make a poll's results say anything I want it to. So what?
It's not an AOL poll. It's the Public Policy Polling. The first news link I found was AOL. Others are below. And I'd be mighty damned impressed if you got a poll to say that 43% of Democrats -- anywhere -- wanted to make interracial marriage illegal. Care to show us that poll?

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/natio...blicans/36455/

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/0...ld-be-illegal/

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/pol...ld-be-illegal/
TexTushHog is offline   Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 12:10 AM   #22
Munchmasterman
Valued Poster
 
Munchmasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
I'd like to see a poll by a reputable polling company before deciding that 46% of the people in Mississippi are racist. Also, while opposing interracial marriage certainly has racist roots, it's not the same as lynching or burning crosses. In fact, (tongue in cheek) 46% might indicate a trend toward tolerance among Mississippians. Just sayin'.
Guardian?

You ask for reputable? Let's put that aside for a moment.

If it certainly has racist roots, does it matter they aren't lynching or burning crosses? When does it cross a line?

When is it too much for you to have an asshole's back for him?
Munchmasterman is offline   Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 12:10 AM   #23
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

I'm not disputing the poll, I'd just like to see a Pew Research, or some unbiased polling company do the same poll. I don't know how the questions were worded, or what else went on in the poll. You can make a poll say anything you want by who you select as your subjects, and how you word the questions. PPP is a company with a liberal bias. All I'm saying is I'm reserving judgment until a more reputable firm does the survey.

And besides, TTH, you promised long ago to provide me proof that the Tea Party was racist. I still haven't seen it.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 01:18 AM   #24
TexTushHog
Professional Tush Hog.
 
TexTushHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 8,959
Encounters: 7
Default

If this poll doesn't show it, I have no idea what you want. The Tea Party is the Republican Party. Period.

And a link to the questions and cross tabs are listed in the articles I posted.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/p...MS_0407915.pdf

Q14 is the one on interracial marriage.

Do you think interracial marriage should be
legal or illegal?

Legal......................... .............................. ........ 40%
Illegal .............................. .............................. .. 46%
Not sure .............................. ............................ 14%


Sounds pretty biased to me!!!
TexTushHog is offline   Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 01:21 AM   #25
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

The poll shows nothing, for the reasons stated before. You can't prove up your point. I don't even like the Tea Party, but they are not racist. Ignorant, yes. Racist, no.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 01:24 AM   #26
TexTushHog
Professional Tush Hog.
 
TexTushHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 8,959
Encounters: 7
Default

So the 43 percent of the Republican Party that are racists just happen to be the few Republicans (who otherwise reason would suggest would be the most moderate Republicans) who don't support the Tea Party movement? On what basis can you possibly conclude that? Only moderate Republicans are racists??!!!!
TexTushHog is offline   Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 01:36 AM   #27
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Get over it, TTH. A left leaning poll proves nothing. The article doesn't even mention the Tea Party. It is innuendo, and would never pass as evidence in court. You know better than this. You just get off on shouting "Racist" when you can't think of anything else to say. It's obvious that you have a lot of latent racist tendencies, that you try to cover by trying to appear indignant.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 01:55 AM   #28
TexTushHog
Professional Tush Hog.
 
TexTushHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 8,959
Encounters: 7
Default

Tea Party = Republican
Republican = 43% Racist
Tea Party = 43% Racist
QED
TexTushHog is offline   Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 01:59 AM   #29
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

I give up. Rest comfortably in your superiority.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 02:23 AM   #30
rockbass
Gaining Momentum
 
Join Date: Nov 14, 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 38
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGiz View Post
Are you actually attempting to obfuscate the blatantly obvious left bias of the New York Times? * Are you denying it?

THAT... was pretty much, the OP's point.
Yes I'm denying it, if you mean on the news pages

their editorial bias is left.
just like the WSJ's editorial bias is way right.
but both report the NEWS impartially as they can

unlike Faux News, which is pure propaganda wall to wall
rockbass is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved