So what's "Abuse of Power?"

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

[oeb11]

WD - in the DPST House - all of your suggestions apply, and many more corruptions of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Please refer to post #9.

Article II does allow Trump or any president to do whatever he wants, within his scope under Article II. that's exactly what the Democrats don't like. He is using his executive branch authority.



interesting that you would post that video. why not dig up some video of Obama exceeding his scope and acting unilaterally like he did several times? shouldn't he have been impeached for that?



Top 10 Ways Obama Violated the Constitution during His Presidency

https://www.cato.org/publications/co...ing-presidency


“Criminal In Chief” — 78 Times President Obama Broke The Law During Presidency

https://outline.com/Eb8GrV


Supreme Court Finds Obama Violated the Constitution

https://gosar.house.gov/news/documen...ocumentID=2325


Obama Leaves the Constitution Weaker Than He Found It

Even for those like me who admire the 44th president, the constitutional record is disturbingly mixed.


https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...und-it/512015/


Should Congress Impeach Obama for His Emoluments Clause Violations?

https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/should-c...se-violations/


DACA Is Unconstitutional, as Obama Admitted

https://www.heritage.org/immigration...obama-admitted


In 6-2 Decision, US Supreme Court Declares Obama Violated the Constitution

https://breakingnewshouse.com/2019/0...-constitution/


note that even the left leaning publication The Atlantic finds Obama lacking. no claiming right wing bias there! and even the Emoluments Clause is raised against Obama.

[oeb11]

TWK - interesting post
Thank You!

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Please refer to post #9.

You know as well as I do that President Trump is saying that in the context of his powers as Chief Executive in the firing of Ambassadors, Special Prosecutors, FBI Chiefs, or anybody else that comes under the auspices of the Exective Branch.

Nailer and Schiff are going to look pretty stupid when this is explained to them in the Senate Trial.

[oeb11]

They will still believe it is their power as the "Oversight" committee " to usurp Presidential functions as they please.

[Hotrod511]

Originally Posted by WTFag

.

Pretty simple but evidently not for simpletons like me .

[gnadfly]

It's not a serious impeachment, it's a Dimocratic pity party.

[kehaar]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

You know as well as I do that President Trump is saying that in the context of his powers as Chief Executive in the firing of Ambassadors, Special Prosecutors, FBI Chiefs, or anybody else that comes under the auspices of the Exective Branch.

Nailer and Schiff are going to look pretty stupid when this is explained to them in the Senate Trial.

"Nailer and Schiff" are incapable of understanding that they look stupid. I have seen some shit, and the fact that the wingnuts are defending them is quite a sight to see. It is unprecedented.

[rexdutchman]

I'm gonna go abuse the toilet now,,,,,