New Pfizer Covid Pills

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bambino

I’m flattered.

He should be also.

Rhetorical question: Why would anyone give a shit what and who another person is on Eccie? Unless, of course, one is interested in them sexually and willing and able to pay the rental for the sex...what ever it costs to suck their dick. There is always that option of vetting someone to make sure it's safe to suck their dick for money. I guess that's a good motivation to waste one's time digging around in someone's background. Is that why they snoop around ... or is it scare them off from posting on here?

[Salty Again]

... Surely rather obvious it's to frighten somebody away
from posting here. --- Just like you mention.

They can't debate the issues, so it's Cancel Culture
- the ol' liberal playbook...

### Salty

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

They can't debate the issues, so it's Cancel Culture
- the ol' liberal playbook...

### Salty

The flaw in their posturing is .... they lack the intellectual and creative qualities to lie well when they make up shit about others. Bill and Hillary Clinton are the perfect examples:

I will never forget the morning Hillary was whimpering and moaning about the "Great Right-Wing Conspiracy" that created a lie about Bill getting a blow job in the oval office from an intern while Hillary was in the other end of the house.

So when she claimed the "Russian Collusion" defeated her "appointment" to the same Oval Office where Bill was getting his knob polished by the "hot" intern .... with whom he NEVER HAD SEX! .... ANYONE with half an ounce of grey matter between their ears KNEW it was just another bullshit lie from Bill's Wife! And turns out she was COLLUDING WITH THEM.

Does their "tactic" work? It didn't work on ASPD ... doesn't work in real life ... and certainly not on Eccie.

[royamcr]

No collusion ever, except for trump.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by royamcr

No collusion ever, except for trump.

... Trump and whom?

#### Salty

[royamcr]

Originally Posted by Grace Preston

Its Hydroxychloroquine-- and its not likely. Part of the reason why doctors were against that treatment protocol-- is that it involved combining Hydro with Acetaminophen (Tylenol)... and both drugs can affect the QT interval of the heart. Those who simply take Hydro for Lupus and a few other things have to have their hearts regularly monitored to ensure they aren't putting themselves at risk.



Ivermectin also does not cure the Covid. It can ease some symptoms in some people, but the percentages in testing aren't encouraging enough to make it a treatment protocol. Its an anti-parasitic.

Ivermectin can lessen symptoms. When symptoms get out of control that is when they become a problem. No it isn't a cure, but does have anti viral potential.

Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence).

Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

https://journals.lww.com/americanthe...ment_of.7.aspx

[LexusLover]

The "trials" lack a sufficient time period to justify freely prescribing them to the general population without a more extended period of time to determine short-term and long-term risks. And aren't these the pills showing birth defects .... so already there is an issue .... I believe the stat is 1 in 7,000 cases for birth defects.

That's also the same with the vaccines and so-called "boosters," because they are NOT traditionally accepted vaccines.

It's one thing to put meds out there for doctor's to prescribe for a specific patient while the doctor AND PATIENT monitor their condition with blood testing and other body-fluid testing, xrays, scanning, and monitoring, particularly in the early stages. Pre-existing conditions and tendencies to develop them during the treatment course are issues that must be addressed.

Making them mandatory and/or intimidating people to take them is ridiculous, if not criminal. How many people will the maime and/or kill to win an election or two. Study the trials and sampling reports ... if you can find them in English. If not the translation needs to be verified.

[Salty Again]

... Listen, Royamcr, I do see yer point concerning
Ivermectin and Hydrocloroquine that Trump was pushing.

Maybe they DID put it in a pill... Trump may've had
the cure the whole time.

... 'Course it IS rather funny that Falci and the others
told Trump to FORGET about a co-vid vaccine. It would
take them 3 to 5 years to develop.

So Trump went to the chemical companys and had them
use their knowledge to develop the vaccines.

He's surely a fellow to be ADMIRED.

### Salty

[royamcr]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... Listen, Royamcr, I do see yer point concerning
Ivermectin and Hydrocloroquine that Trump was pushing.

Maybe they DID put it in a pill... Trump may've had
the cure the whole time.

... 'Course it IS rather funny that Falci and the others
told Trump to FORGET about a co-vid vaccine. It would
take them 3 to 5 years to develop.

So Trump went to the chemical companys and had them
use their knowledge to develop the vaccines.

He's surely a fellow to be ADMIRED.

### Salty

Rather funny that you are parroting what dumb fuck trump said to try to make himself look like a hero, again.

False

There is no evidence that Fauci said a COVID-19 vaccine would never be developed, or that the process would take three, four or five years as Trump said.

Fact is the vaccine technology was already developed over 10 years ago.

Trump had zero input on how to develop, make or distribute a vaccine.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by royamcr

... dumb fuck trump said ...

And you actually believe you have better facts than he did/does?

You must have voted for the BasementDweller Bitten and his Kumola CheckAllBoxes Know&DoNothing!

That pretty much sums up your "analytical qualifications"!

[Salty Again]

... Of course the vaccine technology was developed many years ago.
Look at the "flu shot" - they want you to get one EVERY year.
Why? ... 'Cause they continue to make changes to it.
Surely tryin' to find the proper combination to cure the common cold.

Trump had to give them the go to develop the vax.
And the capital and protection to do it.

... Fauci wanted to wait. 'Til Trump was out of office to
push the vaccine. ... You forget that they HAVE Fauci's e-mails.

Remember how once the vaxes came out - Biden badmouthed them?
So did some other Dems. Didn't trust the Trump shots.

Hee Hee! ... your station seems rather long on fence
and short on standard, Royamcr.

#### Salty

[royamcr]

Jesus H where do you come up with this utter bullshit??? Fucking just making shit up for what pleases your crazy existence.

On top of that Fauci would have no way do know that Trump would lose bigly. So you are saying Fauci was going to wait until an election to see if Trump lost then if he did and Biden was president, now we'll get going on a vaccine. The stupidity of QAnon dumbfucks is astounding. Is JFK back yet?

[Salty Again]

... Is that what you do? Add things not said into someone else's
comments to take them off-kilter?

Fauci DID NOT say a co-vid vax "would never be developed"
- that's YOUR comment.
Fauci and the other scientists were saying it could take
3-5 years to develop it.

But Trump and the Chem companys developed them
at "WARP SPEED"...

And you never answered me question to your statement
about Trump and collusion - WHO did He collude with?

... You should write a new encyclopedia of wrong earbore knowledge!
As you're FULL of it.

#### Salty

[royamcr]

You said Fauci wanted to wait until Trump was out of office. That is stupid talk.

STATEMENT: U.S. Senate Report Confirms Trump Campaign Colluded With Russia, CAP’s Neera Tanden Says
PRESS CONTACTS

Sam Hananel
Foreign Policy and Security

MEDIA CONTACT

Sam Hananel
Associate Director, Media Relations

shananel@americanprogress.org

GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS

Laura Rodriguez
Vice President, Government Affairs

lrodriguez@americanprogress.or g

Washington, D.C. — Today, the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee issued a report finding that the Trump presidential campaign chairman’s interaction with Russian intelligence officials during the 2016 election posed a “grave counterintelligence threat.” In response, Neera Tanden, president and CEO of the Center for American Progress, issued the following statement:

This report confirms that President Donald Trump colluded with Russia during the 2016 election. It confirms the worst suspicions about Trump’s relationship with Russia, filling in the holes left in the report from former special counsel Robert Mueller. As Trump excuses Russian President Vladimir Putin placing bounties on U.S. troops and Russia continues to interfere in our democracy to aid Trump’s reelection, this report makes clear that there is no such thing as a coincidence with Trump and Russia.

The report from the Republican-led panel details close political coordination among the Trump campaign, Wikileaks, and Russian intelligence and operatives in 2016. At the most pivotal moment of that campaign, when the Access Hollywood tape revealing President Trump’s confession of a lifetime of sexual assault, Trump’s confidante Roger Stone successfully requested that Russia’s illegally hacked materials be released immediately.

This revelation also explains why President Trump dangled a pardon for Roger Stone for months, why U.S. Attorney General William Barr gave Stone special treatment amidst an open rebellion from U.S. Department of Justice professionals, and why Trump went even further to commute Stone’s sentence as Stone was concealing these facts from federal investigators. Trump lied to law enforcement about his conversations with Stone and needed Stone to keep quiet about it. This raises serious criminal questions for both Trump and Stone to which the next administration should give full scrutiny.


Maybe if we could read the WHOLE Muller report and not a heavily redacted one... But no Trump is too chicken shit for that and Barr is a traitor for doing it.

[Salty Again]

... If you say so.

#### Salty