Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigbitties38
Yes. Kagan, the editor at large resigned.
|
Why would they resign if it is standard practice to not endorse anyone?!?
Could it be because:
Quote:
Furor over Washington Post’s decision to not endorse presidential candidate: ‘stab in the back’, ‘dying in darkness’
Employees outraged at ‘chicken-shit’ move that breaks 30-year precedent, alleging Jeff Bezos quashed Harris support
...There was uproar and outrage among the Washington Post’s current and former staffers and other notable figures in the world of American media after the newspaper’s leaders on Friday chose to not endorse any candidate in the US presidential election.
The newspaper’s publisher, Will Lewis, announced on Friday that for the first time in over 30 years, the paper’s editorial board would not be endorsing a candidate in this year’s presidential election, nor in future presidential elections...
|
Seems we've encountered a brick wall here. Imma guestimate that there are limited options when you encounter a brick wall:
- Turn around and go back
- Go around or over it
- Deny it is there
- Smash through it
Imma further guestimate that 99.9% of the time folks select one of the first three options. In those cases, would they not be likely to turn around to take one last glance at the writing on said wall?
Failing that: What risk is there if they are so uber confident that the people will select Kamala/Walz easily? I mean, they've been carrying the water for them this whole time, as if they were Gunga Din...
