Why do clients lie to providers about their session? Say they're having a great time and then write a no review??

[MrNyceGuy]

I would think all Jessicas yes reviews would trump a few No reviews.

Plus, theaee ROS comments are what they are. I know for a fact that a hooker cannot cum 5 times in an hour session, yet 99% of the ROS comments say she did. Either that, or she is a good actor.

Well, they are good actors,thats why they pull in 200-250 for an hour of work. Its work for a provider, buy they are good at it.

Typical ROS comment. She opened the day, let me in and gave my a nice kiss. I think she O'd. We stripped out of our cloths and laid on the bed. I started to rub her pussy, she loved it and O'd again. I started licking her pussy and asshole, a minute later she O'd again. I put a cover one, she sat on my dick and O'd again. I dressed, and walked to the door, she kissed me and I swear her legs buckled and she O'd again. I texted her when I got in my car, she didnt respond right away. Later she told me when she saw my number pop up again on her phone, she O'd again and couldnt text back.

Thankfully the ladies cannot read ROS comments. They would laugh do hard, half of them might O again.

Take care, play safe.

[i'va biggen]

LMAO

[lovelydonn]

Really??? Jessica have al the right to openly defend herself against negative information that hurt her reputation!!! there are always 2 sides to a story and I found Jessica's very very detailed account interesting reading after the very vague ROS account of the doubles encounter!!...Jessica's account of the second encounter shows a clear lack of communication.....why blame her for that?......what other recourse does a Lady have but to put out her side; like Jessica did? .....Jessica is one of our beloved Ladies and do not deserve her reputation tainted .....my experience of her is one of our top class Ladies and have recommended on many occasions and will continue in future !!!

[Mccaffery]

Honestly, each provider should eventually recieve a NO, nobody in "sales" has 100% satisfaction rating. I do read the No reviews and try to determine why.
With the 2nd no she says the OP told her about the review, and she took it public. She could have handled that privately with him, and chose not to. The first No, she tried to have it stricken and reversed. He chose no for his reasons, and they are clear in the RoS.
My simple question was how did she get the RoS info.
Her taking this to Co-Ed was her doing especially in the 2nd review "based on her earlier comment".
Does she not expect comments after taking it all public?
Her verbalizing all of this is hurting her more than the 2 simple No recomendations.

[Cleo]

For those of us commenting, have we read the reviews and the ROS's? I went back and read them a second time. At no point did I detect any tone or attitude that could be construed as negative towards Ms Rabbit. In fact, they read as if they were simply reporting how they perceived their experience.

Why are we acting as if she was attacked verbally? To her credit, Ms Rabbit has even stated that there may have been communication issues and misunderstandings. No one appears to be blaming her and no one seemed to be trying to do her harm.

Again, Ms Rabbit even said herself, she personally doesn't feel her efforts and performance justified a "no" recommendation. That seems to be her position based on the fact that she feels that she put her best foot forward, as the rest her reviews suggest.

Even the direct public exchanges between Ms Rabbit and the reviewers read as calm and civil exchanges. No one appears to be berating her, we should stop acting like they are.

[royamcr]

Need to make it so anyone to read ROS and Mens LR that 4-5 reviews have to be written first, even 3 would be better than none. No more buying your way in. Girls have their secret area where they can talk about guys, and you need top secret clearance to get in there. Whereas a $20 and anyone including law can tally up activity.

Still would have the WK pussies fucking things up but at least we could weed out 95% of people that shouldn't be in there. Lots of paying lurkers on this site that don't contribute.

[royamcr]

And to the OP about smoking. I have no problems with girls that smoke, hell I spent 20+ years in smokey pool halls. However I don't think girls realize how repulsed a non smoker can be around a smoker. The breath, the stinky hair and clothes... it just smells dirty. Mooner was spot on about this.

So this guy says how important kissing is, and yes he probably knew she smoked. But when she got there a non smoker can instantly tell, and it is even worse if they smoke in the car. Now I don't know what she smelled like, but she mentioned she smokes and that is plastered all over her info. Maybe girls that smoke should ask if it bothers the guy and if it does see if she can shower and the time doesn't start until she gets out of the shower.

The same goes for the guy, if he shows up after riding a motorcycle in the hot sun for an hour and most definitely has swamp ass he should take a shower when he arrives no questions asked. For the guy that should probably come out of the scheduled amount of time.

[MrNyceGuy]

I still think Jessica got screwed.

[silvrline]

I certainly don't want to take sides here, but I feel compelled to put my 2 cents in -

I've seen Jessica a few times. Once, I know that I myself had had a "bad day" and she was very compassionate and considerate. All times, she has been a great experience. From kink to cuddling, she's been wonderful. Having said that, everyone is entitled to a bad day, if that's indeed the case. I think some effort is required by the client as well - you can't be a douche, or a tard, or whatever people sometimes can be - not that the client(s) in this case were - just sayin'. Jessica has been active in this community, and has contributed, and I've never seen her less than wonderful. I'm not a WK by any stretch, but I say let's give everyone some slack here.

[Savannah Moon]

FYI..this guy's 5 NO's before the one he gave Jessica were from SPA/ Massage
That is NOT uncommon
While your trying to use that as material.
LMAO

[Guest013121]

Originally Posted by Savannah Moon

FYI..this guy's 5 NO's before the one he gave Jessica were from SPA/ Massage
That is NOT uncommon
While your trying to use that as material.
LMAO

Actually it was 4

[Savannah Moon]

Originally Posted by Gemma34

Actually it was 4

Spa..not provider
Point made..
In other words..for some more bs slinging
I would see both of them..
BET

[Guest013121]

Originally Posted by Savannah Moon

Spa..not provider
Point made..
In other words..for some more bs slinging
I would see both of them..
BET

But would they see you?
BET

[VinnAY]

Unless something bad where to happen, I don't leave a "no" review, at least never again will I do it. As long as I didn't get robbed and she showed up then it's all good but sure, not every hobby experience is fantastic. I have a left a no (or a maybe?) just one time and fuck if I didn't get blasted on the forum for it and a call from the provider.
Other than finding legit providers and knowing rates and services I find the rest of the forum, at least the reviews, to be of little to no use, such that I stopped posting reviews for peoples snide little comments and acting like every detail is some "ROS" secret or suffer the wrath of one of the girls.

[malwoody]

Originally Posted by Mccaffery

Do providers have access to the RoS?

OMG....say it ain't so...

I'm shocked..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME